1450
L. Amori et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 1447±1450
Figure 2. (a) Agonist activity of 12 and 13 determined by stimulation of [35S]-GTPgS binding to membranes prepared from CHO-hmGlu4a cells.
Data points were normalized to the stimulation obtained by 1 mM of l-Glu, and represent the mean Æ SEM of three determinations from one
experiment; (b) and (c) Inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in CHO cells expressing hmGlu4a. Forskolin (10 mM) stimulated
cAMP formation by about 40-fold (taken as control). All values are given as fraction of control. The eect of forskolin is inhibited by 1mM l-AP4;
this submaximal agonist concentration represents approximately EC80. To test for agonist activity, 12 and 13 were applied to forskolin-stimulated
CHO cells Antagonist activity of the compounds was assessed by co-application with the sub-maximal concentration of l-AP4. Bars represent mean
Æ SEM of two independent experiments, nꢁ5. Asterisks indicate statistically signi®cant agonist activity (2P<0.01; Dunnett's t-test).
Table 1. Activity of 12 and 13 on two mGlu subtypes expressed in recombinant mammalian cells
Assay
Receptor subtype
Human mGlu2
12
13
EC50 (mM)
IC50 (mM)
EC50 (mM)
IC50 (mM)
Group II mGlu
>200
Group III mGlu
GTPgS binding
>300
>300
>300
GTPgS binding
Human mGlu4a
Human mGlu4a
>30 (Partial agonist)
>30
>100
>100
17 Æ 8
>100
>100
# Forskolin-stimulated cAMP
ꢂ30 No full inhibition
References
and hydrolyzed to give the corresponding amino acids
12 (UPF 703) and 13 (UPF 702), respectively. The
structure assignment was made on the basis of the H
1. Pellicciari, R.; Costantino, G. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999,
3, 433.
1
NMR signal of the ole®nic proton in compounds 23 and
24. Thus, in 23, the ole®nic proton appears as a doublet
(d=6.5) due to the heterocoupling with the phosphorus
atom, while in 24 it appears as a multiplet due to the
heterocoupling with the phosphorus atom and the allylic
coupling with protons in 5-positions.
2. Bruno, V.; Copani, A.; Bonanno, L.; Knoepfel, T.; Kuhn,
R.; Roberts, P. J.; Nicoletti, F. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 310, 61.
3. Flor, P. J.; Ksiazek, I.; Bruno, V. Neuropharmacology 1999,
38, A15.
4. Johansen, P. A.; Chase, L. A.; Sinor, A. D.; Koerner, J. F.;
Johnson, R. L.; Robinson, M. B. Mol. Pharmacol. 1995, 46, 140.
5. Gasparini, F.; Bruno, V.; Battaglia, G.; Lukic, S.; Leon-
hardt, T.; Inderbitzin, W.; Laurie, D.; Sommer, B.; Varney,
M. A.; Hess, S. D.; Johnson, E. C.; Kuhn, R.; Urwyler, S.;
Sauer, D.; Portet, C.; Schmutz, M.; Nicoletti, F.; Flor, P. J. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 289, 1678.
6. Acher, F. C.; Tellier, F. J.; Azerad, R.; Brabet, I. N.; Fagni,
L.; Pin, J. P. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3119.
7. Martin, Y. C.; Bures, M. G.; Danaher, E. A.; DeLazzer, J.;
Lico, I.; Pavlik, P. A. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 83.
8. Bessis, A. S.; Jullian, N.; Coudert, E.; Pin, J. P.; Acher, F.
Neuropharmacology 1999, 10, 1543.
9. The carboxylic analogues of 12, 13 have been reported:
Allan, R. D.; Duke, R. K.; Hambley, T. W.; Johnston, G. A.
R.; Mewett, K. N.; Quickert, N.; Tran, H. W. Aust. J. Chem.
1996, 49, 785.
10. Depres, J. P.; Greene, A. E. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 928.
11. Hodgson, D. M. et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 3357.
12. Mc Murry, J. E.; Scott, W. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 979.
13. Holt, A. D.; Erb, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5393.
14. Flor, P. J.; Lindauer, K.; Puttner, I.; Ruegg, D.; Lukic, S.;
Knopfel, T.; Kuhn, R. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1995, 7, 622.
15. Flor, P. J.; Lukic, S.; Ruegg, D.; Leonhardt, T.; Knopfel,
T.; Kuhn, R. Neuropharmacology 1995, 34, 149.
16. Lazareno, S.; Farries, T.; Birdsall, N. J. Life Sci. 1993, 52,
449.
17. Varney, M. A.; Cosford, N. D.; Jachec, C.; Rao, S. P.;
Sacaan, A.; Lin, F. F.; Bleicher, L.; Santori, E. M.; Flor, P. J.;
Allgeier, H.; Gasparini, F.; Kuhn, R.; Hess, S. D.; Velicelebi,
G.; Johnson, E. C. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 290, 170.
Preliminary biological evaluation
The novel derivatives 12 and 13 were evaluated for their
ability to interact group II or group III mGlu in CHO cell
lines expressing hmGlu2 and hmGlu4a. cAMP Accumula-
tion14,15 and [35S]-GTPgS16,17 assays were employed as
previously described.
While ineective at group II receptor subtypes, both 12
and 13 signi®cantly interact with human mGlu4a, either
in the GTPgS binding assays or in the cAMP assays
(Fig. 2 and Table 1). In particular, in the GTPgS assay
12 is a partial agonist, with an EC50>3 0 mM, while 13 is
a full hmGlu4a agonist with an EC50=17 mM.
In conclusion, we have reported that the cyclopentene
derivatives 12 and 13 are endowed with activity at the
mGlu4a receptor subtype. Compound 12 behaves as a
partial agonist, while 13 is a moderately potent mGlu4a
agonist, thus con®rming our hypothesis on the group III
pharmacophore requirements. It should be noted that
both 12 and 13 have been tested as racemic mixture and
that their anity and functional pro®le (in the case of
the partial agonism of 12) may change when the pure
enantiomers will be synthesized and tested.