Y.-B. Yin et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 4399–4402
4401
condition. The experimental results revealed that the in-
creased yield of the BH adduct could be obtained by
increasing the amount of arylaldehyde and shortening
the reaction time. In the 1:3 ratio of 2a:3a under the
identical conditions for 2 h, 4aa (24%) and 5aa (23%)
were able to be separated by flash column chromatogra-
phy (entry 9). Similarly, 4ad and 5ad were obtained in
20% and 28% yields, respectively (entry 10).
and 2b, the carbon sulfur bond between sulfur atom
and b-carbon atom is flexible.
Recently, Minami and co-workers found a Lewis acid-
promoted deoxygenative di[b,b-bis(ethylthio)]vinylation
of silylketene diethylthioacetal with aldehydes.11 Com-
pared with the electron rich alkene with the three
electron-donating groups used in MinamiÕs research,
the alkenes with electron rich a-carbon atom employed
in our work are polarized by the stronger push (RS)–
pull (R1CO) interaction on the C–C double bond and
are apt to the BH type reaction in the presence of Lewis
acids.
In order to understand the reaction mechanism, the BH
adduct 5aa was reacted with 2a under the identical con-
ditions and the double BH adduct 4aa was obtained in
69% isolated yield. It should be mentioned that, neither
the BH nor the double BH product was found when 4ad
was applied as the electrophile to examine its further
reaction with 2a under the same conditions. As the aryl-
aldehyde bearing an electron-donating group on the aryl
ring, this result indicated that 4ad was not reactive to-
wards 2a under the reaction conditions.
In conclusion, we have described a novel Baylis–Hill-
man type reaction between a-oxoketene dithioacetals
and arylaldehydes leading to the polyfunctionalized
1,4-pentadienes.12 As far as we know, this is the first
example in which the activated alkenes having two
b,b-dialkylthio substituents are investigated in the BH
reaction and similar processes. This research represents
a new methodology for the C–C bond formation at
the a-carbon atom of a-oxo ketene dithioacetals. Fur-
ther investigation on this process and the application
of the double BH products are in progress in our
laboratory.
Unlike the mechanism of the TiCl4-catalyzed BH reac-
tion,10 which is believed to proceed through the
Michael-initiated addition–elimination sequence, the
stronger nucleophilicity of the a-carbon atom of 2 might
require only electrophiles to be activated. Based on the
experimental results mentioned above, the mechanism
concerned was thus proposed and depicted in Scheme
3 (with 2a as an example).
Acknowledgements
Initiated by the nucleophilic attack of the electron rich
a-carbon atom of 2a at the carbonyl carbon of the acti-
vated aldehyde, the BH adduct 5 was first produced via
intermediate I. And then the double BH product 4 was
formed from the reaction of intermediate III and 2a with
the aid of TiCl4. Combining the experimental results
with the proposed mechanism, it was indicated that:
(1) the reaction of 2a with arylaldehydes should be the
rate determination step, and (2) the easy formation of
the double BH product was probably due to the higher
stability of the carbocation intermediate III from the
delocalization of the positive charge by the bialkylthio
sulfur atoms. The activated alkene 2b possessed the sim-
ilar property to 2a. The inert of 2c to this process may be
due to the deactivated effect by the formation of a com-
plex between TiCl4 with the lone pair electrons of the
sulfur atoms of 2c because, unlike the rigid cyclic 2a
Financial supports of this research by the NNSFC
(20272008) and the Key Grant Project of Chinese Min-
istry of Education (10412) are greatly acknowledged.
References and notes
1. For reviews see: (a) Dieter, R. K. Tetrahedron 1986, 42,
3029; (b) Junjappa, H.; Ila, H.; Asokan, C. V. Tetrahedron
1990, 46, 5423.
2. (a) Barun, O.; Ila, H.; Junjappa, H.; Singh, O. M. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 1583; (b) Suresh, J. R.; Barun, O.; Ila, H.;
Junjappa, H. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8153; (c) Suresh, J. R.;
Syam Kumar, U. K.; Ila, H.; Junjappa, H. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 781; (d) Nandi, S.; Syam Kumar, U. K.; Ila, H.;
Junjappa, H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4916.
3. (a) Wang, M.; Xu, X. X.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, L.; Yang, B.;
Gao, L. X. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 3437; (b) Zhao, Y.
L.; Liu, Q.; Sun, R.; Xu, X. X.; Pan, L. Chem. J. Chin.
Univ. 2002, 23, 1901; (c) Zhao, Y. L.; Liu, Q.; Sun, R.;
Zhang, Q.; Xu, X. X. Synth. Commun. 2004, 34, 463.
4. (a) Gill, S.; Kocienski, P. J.; Kohler, A.; Pontiroli, A.; Liu,
Q. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1743; (b) Kocienski, P. J.;
Alessandro, P.; Liu, Q. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2001, 2356; (c) Liu, Q.; Che, G. B.; Yu, H. F.; Liu, Y. C.;
Zhang, J. P.; Zhang, Q.; Dong, D. W. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 9148; (d) Yu, H. F.; Liu, Q.; Yin, Y. B.; Fang, Q. X.;
Zhang, J. P.; Dong, D. W. Synlett 2004, 6, 999; (e) Liu, Y.
C.; Dong, D. W.; Liu, Q.; Qi, Y. M.; Wang, Z. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 28; (f) Sun, S. G.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Y.
C.; Zhao, Y. L.; Dong, D. W. Synlett 2004, 1731.
O
S
Ar
O
S
TiCl4
O
ArCH=O
TiCl4
H
S
-TiCl4
5
S
2a
I
O
O
Ar
H+
-TiCl3(OH)
TiCl4
-HCl
O
2a
Ar
4
TiCl3
S
S
S
S
5. (a) Drewes, S. E.; Roos, G. H. P. Tetrahedron 1988, 44,
4653; (b) Basavaiah, D.; Dharma Rao, P.; Suguna Hyma,
R. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8001; (c) Langer, P. Angew.
Chem, Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3049; (d) Basavaiah, D.;
II
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanism.
III