8
88
L. Songzhu et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 77 (2010) 885–889
hand, the ED transition of 5D → F is hypersensitive towards
7
0
2
3+
the micro-environment around Eu . Since no spectral splitting is
detected for both insensitive and hypersensitive transitions, it is
thus estimated that all Eu(TTA) ECIP molecules localize in a homo-
3
geneous micro-environment within PS matrix, which is critical for
a good linear response and will be further confirmed later. In addi-
tion, it is observed that the micro-environment within PS matrix
has no obvious influence on the emission peaks of Eu(TTA) ECIP
3
because the partially filled 4f orbitals are shielded from environ-
ment by the filled 5d and 5p orbitals, offering a good antijam ability
towards environment effect.
As mentioned above, high photostability is a desired charac-
ter for sensing materials. The inset of Fig. 3 demonstrates the
emission intensity variations of the 2.5 wt% doped sample and
pure Eu(TTA) ECIP powder upon excitation wavelength of 350 nm.
3
Clearly, both samples suffer from photobleaching caused by photo-
induced structural decomposition. What’s more, it is observed that
the composite sample owns a largely improved photodurability
Fig. 4. Emission spectra of the 2.5 wt% doped sample under various oxygen concen-
trations from 0% to 100% with an interval of 10%.
compared with pure Eu(TTA) ECIP powder, which can be explained
3
as follows. The PS matrix may provide a rigid environment and thus
a shield for Eu(TTA) ECIP molecules, restraining the photo-induced
3
structural decomposition. In addition, it is observed that the 2.5 wt%
doped sample shows a better photodurability upon excitation
wavelength of 260 nm compared with that under 350 nm radiation,
which can be explained as follows. The PS absorption at 260 nm
is stronger than that at 350 nm, consequently, the largely domi-
interval of 10%. It is observed that the emission intensity at 610 nm
decreases with the increasing oxygen concentrations. Here, oxy-
gen sensitivity is defines as I0/I100, where I0 is the luminescence
intensity under 100% N2 atmosphere and I100 is that under 100%
O2 atmosphere. The corresponding values for the four samples
are measured to be 2.45 for the 1.5 wt% doped sample, 2.68 for
the 2 wt% doped sample, 3.40 for the 2.5 wt% doped sample, and
2.57 for the 3 wt% doped sample. Correspondingly, the 5D0 → F2
lifetimes for the four samples are measured to be 380 s for the
1.5 wt% doped sample, 420 s for the 2 wt% doped sample, 440 s
for the 2.5 wt% doped sample, and 420 s for the 3 wt% doped
sample. The 2.5 wt% doped sample exhibits a higher sensitivity
and a longer lifetime than the others, which means that the sen-
sitivity and the 5D0 → F2 lifetime are not simply proportional
to the loading concentration. It is thus reasonable to expect that
there are at lest two opposite factors affecting sample sensitivity:
emission intensity from probe molecules and adverse interac-
tion between probe molecules (aggregation, for example). A low
loading concentration leads to a weak emission from the probe
and correspondingly the low sensitivity. On the contrary, a much
higher loading concentration may result in the intermolecular
aggregation which also decreases the sensitivity. This hypothesis
is supported by the luminescence lifetimes analyses mentioned
above. The two opposite factors may achieve a balance in the
2.5 wt% doped sample, resulting in the maximum sensitivity of
3.40.
nant matrix may transfer energy from PS matrix to Eu(TTA) ECIP
3
molecules upon excitation wavelength of 260 nm, which is also
7
helpful for photodurability improvement of Eu(TTA) ECIP.
3
5
7
The D → F emissions of the four samples follow an exhibit
0
2
single-exponential decay pattern with lifetimes of 380 s for
the 1.5 wt% doped sample, 420 s for the 2 wt% doped sample,
4
40 s for the 2.5 wt% doped sample, and 420 s for the 3 wt%
5
7
doped sample, respectively. The D → F luminescence lifetime
0
2
7
shows an increase tendency with increasing concentrations from
.5 to 2.5 wt%, which means that the intermolecular interaction
1
between Eu(TTA) ECIP molecules is so weak and the increasing
3
concentrations of Eu(TTA) ECIP molecules are positive to depress
3
nonradiative decay within the matrix. Upon an even higher dopant
concentration of 3 wt%, the 5D → F luminescence lifetime tends
7
0
2
to decrease due to the adverse intermolecular aggregation. Those
long luminescence lifetimes make the samples vulnerable and sen-
sitive towards energy-acceptors such as molecular oxygen. What
is more, those long luminescence lifetimes make the elimination
of fluorescence originated from surrounding impurity such as pro-
tein possible and practicable, offering an antijam ability towards
fluorescence pollution.
5
7
3+
Despite of the long D → F lifetime of Eu center (440 s) as
0
2
3
.4. Oxygen-sensing properties of Eu(TTA) ECIP/PS nanofibrous
mentioned above, the samples’ sensitivity values are much lower
than those of sensing systems based on Ru2+ and Cu+ complexes
whose excited lifetimes are greatly shorter (<100 s) [7,10]. It is
expected that the luminescence mechanism difference between
3
membranes
Considering the long luminescence lifetimes mentioned above,
we intend to investigate their PL responses towards molecular oxy-
3
+
+
2+
Eu -based and Cu /Ru -based emitters should be responsible
+
2+
gen and thus explorer the possibility of using Eu(TTA) ECIP/PS
for this phenomenon. As for typical Cu /Ru -based emitters, the
highest occupied molecular orbital has a predominant metal d
character, while the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital is essen-
tially * orbital of the ligands. Their emission corresponds to the
lowest triplet T1, and the excited state electron localizes on the
3
nanofibrous membranes as oxygen-sensing materials. According
to the literature reports, molecular oxygen is an efficient killer for
excited state emitters: energy transfer between molecular oxygen
and excited state emitters happens, and the quenching mechanism
is a dynamic one which can be presented as follows [7,12]:
+
2+
ligands, which makes Cu /Ru -based emitters open for molec-
ular oxygen attack, leading to a high sensitivity. While, as for a
Eu(TTA) ECIP ∗ + O → Eu(TTA) ECIP + O ∗
(1)
3
2
3
2
3+
Eu -based emitter, the emission originates from metal-centered
where “*” indicates an excited state.
.4.1. Sensitivity of Eu(TTA) ECIP/PS nanofibrous membranes
Fig. 4 shows the emission spectra of the 2.5 wt% doped sam-
ple under various oxygen concentrations from 0% to 100% with an
f–f transitions. The emissive center is covered by surrounding lig-
ands and outer filled orbitals of Eu3+, preventing molecular oxygen
from closing in, leading to the low sensitivity, even though the
excited state lifetime is much longer than those of Cu /Ru -based
emitters.
3
3
+
2+