H. Kargar, A.A. Ardakani, M.N. Tahir et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1229 (2021) 129842
˚
In the current research we have focused our endeavor to the
synthesis, structural elucidation and antimicrobial properties of
bromo substituted salen type Schiff base and its complexes with
Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II).
(λ = 0.71073 A). The brown, dark red and yellow single crys-
tals of Ni(L), Cu(L) and Zn(L) suitable for X-ray analysis were
obtained from methanol solution and mounted on a glass fiber
for data collection on Bruker Apex-II software [27]. The struc-
tures were solved by direct methods and subsequent difference
Fourier maps on SHELXS97 [28] and then refined on F2 by a
full-matrix least-squares procedure using anisotropic displacement
parameters. Atomic factors are from the international tables for
X-ray Crystallography [29]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined
with anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms were
placed in ideal positions and refined as riding atoms with rela-
tive isotropic displacement parameters. All refinements were per-
formed using the SHELXL-2018/3 and WinGX-2014.1 programs
[30,31]. The method to collect data was ω-scans and integrated
using Bruker SAINT [32] software package. The crystallographic il-
lustrations for complexes were prepared using ORTEP-3 [33] and
platon [34]. Experimental parameters pertaining to single-crystal
X-ray analysis of complexes are given in Table 1.
2. Experimental
2.1. Physical measurements
Microanalysis of the complexes were done using a Heraeus
CHN-O-FLASH EA 1112 elemental analyzer. FT-IR spectra were
recorded on a FT-IR Prestige 21 spectrophotometer from 400-
4000 cm−1 using KBr pellets. 1H NMR spectroscopy in DMSO-
d6 (400 MHz, Bruker) was carried out by using tetramethylsilane
(TMS) as internal standard. Chemical shifts for proton resonances
are reported in ppm (δ) relative to tetramethylsilane and DMSO-
d6.
2.2. Synthesis of the Schiff base (H2L)
2.5. Antimicrobial activity
All the chemicals and solvents used for the syntheses were of
commercially available reagent grade and were used without fur-
ther purification. Schiff base ligand was prepared following the
literature procedure [26]. To a stirred ethanolic (25 mL) solution
of 3,5-dibromosalicylaldehyde (2 mmol) was added an ethanolic
(25 mL) solution of the 1,3-propanediamine (1 mmol). The reac-
tion mixture was refluxed for 1-3 h in a water bath. The resulting
solution was cooled to room temperature and the precipitates ob-
tained were collected by suction filtration and washed with cold
ethanol (3 × 10 mL) to afford the desired Schiff base.
The Schiff base ligand and its metal(II) complexes were stud-
ied to assess their potentials as antibacterial agents. The tested
microorganisms were the standard strains of two Gram-positive
(Staphylococcus aureus PTCC1431, Bacillus cereus PTCC1015), and
two Gram-negative (Escherichia coli PTCC1394, Pseudomonas aerug-
inosa PTCC1074) bacteria. In order to compare the results, ery-
thromycin (15 mg/disk) was used as an antibiotic reference drug.
The compounds were dissolved in DMSO at 50 μg/mL concentra-
tion. Determination of the antibacterial activity was carried out by
spot-on the lawn method. Antibacterial activity of ligand and its
corresponding complexes were tested by spotting the solution of
20 μL of ligand and its complexes onto the soft agar lawn, seeded
with 107 cells/ml of standard strains. Each solution of ligand and
its complexes were placed on the surface-inoculated TSA agars and
incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Inhibition zone around the specimens
was used to indicate antibacterial activity of each compound. Each
test was performed in triplicate.
2.3. General procedure for the synthesis of the complexes
In order to synthesize the nickel(II) complexes [Ni(L)], the
metal precursor Ni(OAc)2.4H2O (0.248 g, 1 mmol), for copper(II)
complexes [Cu(L)], the metal precursor Cu(OAc)2.H2O (0.200 g,
1
mmol), for zinc(II) complexes [Zn(L)], the metal precursor
Zn(OAc)2.2H2O (0.220 g, 1 mmol) was added to a hot methano-
lic solution (30 mL) of the corresponding ligand H2L (1.0 mmol).
The resultant mixture was refluxed for 3 h and then it was filtered,
washed thoroughly with methanol and dried.
3. Results and discussion
[Ni(L)], Yield: 81 %. Calculated for C17 H12Br4N2NiO2: C 31.19,
H 1.85, N 4.28 %. Analysis found: C 31.31, H 1.92, N 4.17. FT-IR
3.1. Syntheses
(KBr, cm−1): υ C H(aromatic): 3063, υ C H(aliphatic): 2941, 2878,
–
–
The Schiff base ligand H2L was prepared by the reac-
tion of 1,3-diaminopropane with the corresponding 3,5-
dibromosalicylaldehyde in nearly 78 % yield in ethanol. Treatment
of the Schiff base ligands H2L with the respective Ni(OAc)2.4H2O,
=
=
–
–
υ HC N: 1618, υ C C and C N: 1578, 1508, 1442, 1375, υ C O:
1319, υ Ni-N: 534, υ Ni O: 415. 1H NMR [d6-DMSO, δ (ppm)]: 8.58
–
– =
(s, 2 H, H C N), 7.58 (d, 2 H, J = 2.4 Hz, H arom.), 7.41 (d, 2 H,
J = 2.4 Hz, H arom.), 3.73 (t, 4 H, CH2-N), 2.08 (br, 2 H, CH2-C).
[Cu(L)], Yield: 85 %. Calculated for C17 H12Br4CuN2O2: C 30.96,
H 1.83, N 4.25 %. Analysis found: C 31.11, H 1.89, N 4.12. FT-IR
(KBr, cm−1): υ C-H(aromatic): 3064, υ C-H(aliphatic): 2941, 2868,
Cu(OAc)2.H2O and Zn(OAc)2.2H2O in
a 1:1 ratio under reflux
condition led to the nickel(II), copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes,
respectively. The spectroscopic data is in good agreement with
the chemical formula proposed for Schiff base complexes. The
synthetic procedure of Schiff base ligand and their complexes is
=
=
–
υ HC N: 1622, υ C C and C N: 1577, 1508, 1440, 1382, υ C-O:
1309, υ Cu N: 545, υ Cu O: 425.
–
–
[Zn(L)], Yield: 68 %. Calculated for C17 H12Br4N2O2Zn: C 30.88,
H 1.83, N 4.24 %. Analysis found: C 30.97, H 1.92, N 4.02. FT-IR
(KBr, cm−1): υ C-H(aromatic): 3062, υ C-H(aliphatic): 2924, 2854,
3.2. Crystal structures of complexes
=
=
–
–
υ HC N: 1620, υ C C and C N: 1575, 1508, 1440, 1384, υ C O:
of the molecule with nickel atom at the special position i.e. on
two fold axis and the other half of the molecule is symmetri-
cally generated with symmetry code (–x, -y,1/2-z). The coordina-
tion sphere around the Ni-atom consists of two oxygen atoms
and two nitrogen atoms from chelating ligands. In the coordina-
1298, υ Ni N: 542, υ Ni O: 410. 1H NMR [d6-DMSO, δ (ppm)]:
–
–
– =
8.27 (s, 2 H, H C N), 7.63 (d, 2 H, J = 2.6 Hz, H arom.), 7.38 (d, 2
H, J = 2.6 Hz, H arom.), 3.77 (t, 4 H, CH2-N), 1.97 (br, 2 H, CH2-C).
2.4. Crystallographic methods
–
–
tion sphere, the bond lengths Ni O and Ni N are 1.863 (2) and
˚
The X-ray diffraction measurement of Ni(L), Cu(L) and Zn(L)
complexes were carried out on Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD X-
ray diffractometer with graphite monochromated Mo-Kα radiation
1.879 (3) A, respectively whereas the bond angles range from 84.69
(1)° to 92.00 (2)°, thus slightly distorted square planar geome-
try is formed. The 3-iminopropan-1-ol group A (C1/C6/C7/N1/O1)
2