A R T I C L E S
Li et al.
9
the evaluation of detailed kinetics and turnover frequencies.
that these interactions are responsible for the inhibitory effects
on the catalytic cycle.
In addition, advances in signal processing and chemometric
10
techniques have significantly improved the limits of detection.
Although these developments have largely focused on under-
standing the primary characteristics of quite active catalytic
systems, potential certainly exists for using these tools to better
understand more subtle aspects of the chemistry, for example
changes in selectivity and activity patterns.
Experimental Section
General. All solution preparations and transfers were carried
out under purified argon (99.9995%, Saxol, Singapore) atmosphere
using standard Schlenk techniques or conducted in a glovebox
(especially when handling (η -C
5
5
H
5
)Mo(CO)
3
H). The argon was
further purified before use by passing it through a deoxy and zeolite
packed column. Carbon monoxide (research grade, 99.97%, Saxol,
Singapore), hydrogen (99.9995%, Saxol, Singapore), and deuterium
Bimetallic and multimetallic homogeneous catalyzed reactions
have attracted considerable attention, due in part to dramatically
1
1
increased reaction rates observed in some systems. The
mechanistic basis for synergism has been clearly identified for
a few systems using in situ spectroscopic techniques. These
include (1) the Ir/Ru catalyzed carbonylation of methanol, where
NMR has shown that Ru aids in the abstraction of iodine from
(
99.8%, Spectra Gases, Branchburg, NJ) were also further purified
through deoxy and zeolite columns before they were used in the
hydroformylation experiments. Purified air was used to purge the
Bruker Vertex70 FT-IR spectrometer system.
The chemicals used in the present study include n-hexane (99.5%
1
2
5
Fluka puriss), Rh
(
4
(CO)12 (98% Strem), and (η -C
5
H
5
)Mo(CO)
3
H
a crucial iridium intermediate, and (2) the Rh/Mn and Rh/Re
hydroformylations of alkenes, where in situ FTIR has shown
Sigma Aldrich), cyclopentene (99%, Fluka), 3,3-dimethylbut-1-
9
d,e,g,h,13
ene (99%, Fluka, 33DMB), and cyclopentane carboxaldehyde. The
n-hexane was purified by distillation from NaK under argon. The
cyclopentene was purified by distillation from maleic anhydride to
that catalytic binuclear elimination occurs.
In the present contribution, the hydroformylation of cyclo-
pentene and 3,3-dimethylbut-1-ene starting with Rh (CO)12 and
H as catalyst precursors was performed, and
9
e
remove dienes, followed by distillation from CaH
2
under argon.
3
4
5
5
The organometallics Rh
4
(CO)12 and (η -C
H
5 5
)Mo(CO) H were used
(
5 5 3
η -C H )Mo(CO)
without further purification.
in situ FTIR was used as the quantitative spectroscopic method.
In this heterobimetallic system, both synergistic and inhibitory
effects were observed. Consequently, stoichiometric and labeling
experiments were performed to clarify mechanistic issues,
particularly the presence of catalytic binuclear elimination. The
spectroscopic, kinetic, and physicochemical measurements
together with DFT calculations confirm that solute-solute
interactions are occurring, in particular hydrogen bonding, and
Apparatus. Hydroformylations were performed in an in-house
designed 100 mL high-pressure SS316 reactor, which was connected
with an injection block, and a high-pressure magnetically driven
gear pump (Model GAH-X21, Micro pump, Vancouver, WA). The
high-pressure infrared cell was situated in a Bruker Vertex-70 FT-
-
1
IR spectrometer, and the spectral resolution was 2 cm with an
interval of 0.12 cm- for the range 1000-2500 cm . A detailed
1
-1
description of the reactor, pump, injection block and mass transfer
issues can be found elsewhere. In addition, a high-pressure syringe
pump (PHD 4400, Harvard Apparatus) was used for injecting (η -
5 5 3
C H )Mo(CO) H/n-hexane under high-pressure reaction conditions.
14
5
(
7) (a) Laurenczy, G.; Helm, L. In Mechanisms in Homogeneous Catalysis:
A Spectroscopic Approach; Heaton, B., Ed.; Wiley: Germany, 2005;
pp 81-106. (b) Haynes, A. In Mechanisms in Homogeneous Catalysis:
A Spectroscopic Approach; Heaton, B., Ed.; Wiley: Germany, 2005;
pp 107-150. (c) Viviente, E. M.; Pregosin, P. S.; Schott, D. In
Mechanisms in Homogeneous Catalysis: A Spectroscopic Approach;
Heaton, B., Ed.; Wiley: Germany, 2005; pp 1-80. (d) Casey, C. P.;
Beetner, S. E.; Johnson, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2285–
Examples of the use of this experimental system can be found
9
elsewhere, and further details concerning the present experimental
setup can be found in the Supporting Information.
In-Situ Spectroscopic and Kinetic Measurements. All of the
catalytic hydroformylation experiments were performed in a similar
manner. First, a background spectrum of the IR sample chamber
5
2
295.
was recorded. Rh
(CO)12 and/or (η -C
5
H
5
)Mo(CO)
3
H were dis-
4
(
8) (a) Liu, J.; Heaton, B.; Iggo, J. A.; Whyman, R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43 (1), 90–94. (b) Haynes, A.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
solved in 50 mL of n-hexane and then transferred under argon to
the reactor. Under 0.2 MPa CO pressure, infrared spectra of the
solution in the high-pressure cell were recorded. The total system
pressure was raised to 1.7 MPa CO, and the stirrer and high-pressure
gear pump were started. After equilibration, infrared spectra of the
solution in the high-pressure cell were recorded. Then 1 mL of
cyclopentene was injected via the injection block and 1.7 MPa
hydrogen was added to start the reactions. The experimental design
2
004, 126, 2847–2861.
(
9) (a) Garland, M.; Pino, P. Organometallics 1990, 10, 1693–1704. (b)
Liu, G.; Volken, R.; Garland, M. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3429–
3
4
1
2
436. (c) Feng, J.; Garland, M. Organometallics 1999, 18 (3), 417–
27. (d) Li, C.; Widjaja, E.; Garland, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
25, 5540–5548. (e) Li, C.; Widjaja, E.; Garland, M. Organometallics
004, 23, 4131–4138. (f) Liu, G.; Li, C.; Guo, L.; Garland, M. J.
Catal. 2006, 237, 67–78. (g) Li, C.; Chen, L.; Garland, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 133327–13334. (h) Li, C.; Chen, L.; Garland,
M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 679–690.
is listed in Table 1. The high-pressure syringe pump was used for
5
injecting (η -C
1
1
5
H
5
)Mo(CO)
3
H/n-hexane in semibatch Exp 5 at ca.
(
(
10) Garland, M. In Mechanisms in Homogeneous Catalysis: A Spectro-
scopic Approach; Heaton, B., Ed.; Wiley: Germany, 2005; pp 151-
60 min. Spectra were recorded at 1 min intervals in the range
-1
000-2500 cm . In every 4-h experiment, ca. 250 spectra were
1
93.
taken. Note that the gas pressures were changed in Exp 7-9 to
11) (a) Guo, N.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130
7), 2246–2261. (b) Sammis, G. M.; Danjo, H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am.
promote a higher yield of RCORh(CO)
labeled experiments.
4
for the stoichiometric and
(
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (32), 9928–9929. (c) Li, H.; Marks, T. J. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103 (42), 15295–15302. (d) Adams,
R. D., Albert Cotton, F., Eds. Catalysis by di-and polynuclear metal
cluster complexes; Wiley: New York, 1998.
Volume of Interaction Measurements. Recently, a method has
been developed to determine the volumes of interaction between
15
solutes in dilute multicomponent solutions. This method was
(
(
12) (a) Sunley, G. J.; Watson, D. J. Catal. Today 2000, 58, 293–307. (b)
Whyman, R.; Wright, A. P.; Iggo, J. A.; Heaton, B. T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 2002, 771–777.
applied to the present system, during low-pressure noncatalytic
conditions, to determine the degree of interaction present in
13) (a) Collman, J. P.; Hegedus, L. S.; Norton, J. R.; Finke, R. G. Principles
and Applications of Organotransition Metal Chemistry; University
Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1987. (b) Norton, J. R. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1979, 12, 139–145. (c) Jones, W. D.; Huggins, J.; Bergman, R. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4415–4423. (d) Martin, B.; Warner,
D. K.; Norton, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108 (1), 33–39. (e)
Nappa, M. J.; Santi, R.; Halpern, J. Organometallics 1985, 4, 34–41.
(14) Gao, F.; Ng, K.; Li, C.; Krummel, K.; Allian, A.; Garland, M. J. Catal.
2006, 237, 49–57.
(15) (a) Tjahjono, M.; Guo, L.; Garland, M. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60
(12), 3239–3249. (b) Tjahjono, M.; Garland, M. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007,
62, 3861–3867.
4
590 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 13, 2010