42 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 1, 1999
Audergon et al.
isotope effect (kH/kD)obs is equal to the intrinsic isotope effect
(kH/kD) for the reaction.13-17 If the equilibration rate is slow, or
of the same order of magnitude as bond breaking, (kH/kD)obs
will vary between a value of 1 (no isotope effect) and kH/kD
(maximum (intrinsic) isotope effect). Factors that can affect
equilibration rate can affect the magnitude of (kH/kD)obs.
18 These
factors are termed masking factors, and include slow dissociation
of the enzyme-substrate complex and restrictions on reorienta-
tion of substrate in the active site. Thus, the value of (kH/kD)obs
and the extent of its departure from kH/kD has the capacity to
provide unique information on substrate motion in the active
site.
Figure 1. Intramolecular distances between methyl group carbon atoms
for o- and p-xylene and 4,4′-dimethylbiphenyl calculated using Spartan
Molecular Mechanics software.
Previous isotope effect studies indicate that the intrinsic
isotope effects for cytochrome P450 catalyzed hydroxylations
of methyl groups in different electronic environments are
relatively insensitive to changes in enzyme active site archi-
tecture.19,20 While differences in substrate electronic character
may dictate different intrinsic isotope effects for the methyl
group hydroxylation of a saturated hydrocarbon versus that of
the N-methyl of an aromatic amine, the intrinsic isotope effect
for the methyl group hydroxylation of a given substrate is
essentially invariant across different P450 isoforms that are
capable of catalyzing the reaction. This insensitivity further
suggests that any significant departure of (kH/kD)obs from kH/
kD, for the same or similar substrates, is not due to changes in
energetics or mechanism but rather to factors that are capable
of masking kH/kD. Likely factors are the distance between
chemically equivalent but isotopically distinct catalytic sites in
the substrate and/or active site constraint of substrate motion.
To test the hypothesis that distance is the factor that can affect
the magnitude of (kH/kD)obs, a set of substrates was chosen in
which this distance between the catalytic sites was systematically
varied. The chosen substrates included selectivity deuterated
o-xylene, p-xylene, and 4,4′-dimethylbiphenyl where the dis-
tance between carbon atoms of equivalent protio and deutero
sites is geometrically fixed for each substrate but varies from a
minimum of 2.48 Å (o-xylene) to a maximum of 11.05 Å (4,4′-
dimethylbiphenyl)21 between substrates,18 Figure 1. The fixed
distances and the lack of orienting elements such as polar- or
hydrogen-bonding sites allowed the combination of the effects
of distance and active-site constraints to be explored without
the complication of additional contributing features. The results
of this study strongly suggested that the near complete sup-
pression of kH/kD for the benzylic hydroxylation of 4-2H3,4′-
dimethylbiphenyl, whether catalyzed by P450 2B1 or various
microsomal preparations, was a direct consequence of the 11.05
Å distance separating the carbon atoms of the 4 and 4′ methyl
groups.
Although the earlier study18 suggested that intrinsic isotope
effect masking and distance are related, it did not have the
capacity to reveal the exact cause of masking or the relative
rates of dissociation and active site reorientation for each
substrate. In contrast, molecular dynamics simulations could
provide validation of the distance/constrained motion hypothesis
since such studies would allow direct assessment of the mobility
of a substrate in the active site of a P450 of known crystal
structure and one for which the atomic coordinates are readily
available. Indeed, molecular dynamics computational studies
have been used to determine active-site motions in enzymes
such as triosephosphate isomerase,22 ribonuclease T1,23 and
carboxypeptidase A.24 In the case of P450, the bacterial isoform
P450 101 has been studied extensively by using substrate-bound
models originating from known X-ray crystal data, e.g.,
camphor, norcamphor, and thiocamphor,25-28 whereas other
studies have adapted these models to study valproic acid, benzo-
[a]pyrene, and nicotine in the enzyme-substrate complex.29-31
Overall, these studies have led to a greater understanding of
active-site architecture, substrate-binding phenomena, and cata-
lytically related motion of both substrate and enzyme.
In this paper, we present results from parallel experimental
and computational studies that provide strong support for the
hypothesis that the degree of masking found in intramolecular
isotope effects is directly related to the rates of interchange
between chemically equivalent but isotopically distinct metabolic
sites in the active site. This methodology provides a means of
assessing the constraints of an enzyme active site toward
substrate motion. Furthermore, these experiments provide insight
into how to approach synchronization of experimental and
molecular dynamics clocks.
Results
Validation of the Molecular Dynamics Protocols with
D-(1R)- and L-(1S)-Norcamphor. The relative carbon radical
(13) Northrop, D. B. Biochemistry 1975, 14, 2644-2651.
(14) Northrop, D. B. In Isotope Effects On Enzyme Catalyzed Reactions;
Cleland, W. W., O’Leary, M. H., Northrop, D. B., Eds.; University Park
Press: Baltimore, 1977; pp 122-148.
(15) Miwa, G. T.; Garland, W. A.; Hodshon, B. J.; Lu, A. Y.; Northrop,
D. B. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 6049-6054.
(22) Brown, F. K.; Kollman, P. A. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 198, 533-546.
(23) MacKerell, A. D.; Nilsson, L.; Rigler, R.; Heinemann, U.; Saenger,
W. Proteins 1989, 6, 20-31.
(16) Northrop, D. B. Ann. ReV. Biochem. 1981, 50, 103-131.
(17) Northrop, D. B. Biochemistry 1981, 20 4056-4061.
(18) Iyer, K. R.; Jones, J. P.; Darbyshire, J. F.; Trager, W. F. Biochemistry
1997, 35, 7136-7143.
(24) Makinen, M. W.; Troyer, J. M.; van der Werff, H.; Bernedsen, H.
J. C.; van Gunsteren, W. F. J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 207, 201-216.
(25) Collins, J. R.; Loew, G. H. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 263, 3164-3170.
(26) Paulsen, M. D.; Bass, M. B.; Ornstein, R. L. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.
1991, 9, 187-203.
(19) Jones, J. P.; Rettie, A. E.; Trager, W. F. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33,
1242-1246.
(27) Paulsen, M. D.; Ornstein, R. L. J. Comp.-Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 6,
449-460.
(20) Kharki, S. B.; Dinnocenzo, J. P.; Jones, J. P.; Korzekwa, K. R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3657-3664.
(28) Bass, B. B.; Paulsen, M. D.; Ornstein, R. L. Proteins 1992, 13,
26-37.
(21) The carbon atoms of the methyl groups are taken as the frame of
reference for defining inter-methyl group distance (calculated using Spartan
Molecular Mechanics software) since it is fixed, unlike the distances between
the rotationally mobile inter-methyl group hydrogens. The distance of closest
approach that can be achieved between two hydrogens that are bonded to
different methyl groups in the same substrate is approximately 1.4 Å for
o-xylene, 6.7 Å for p-xylene, and 11.1 Å for 4,4′-dimethylbiphenyl.
(29) Collins, J. R.; Camper, D. L.; Loew, G. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 2736-2743.
(30) Jones, J. P.; Trager, W. F.; Carlson, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 381-387.
(31) Jones, J. P.; Shou, M.; Korzekwa, K. R. Biochemistry 1995, 34,
6956-6961.