J. Xing et al.
Dyes and Pigments 189 (2021) 109233
Table 1
a
Optical and electrochromic properties of FeL1, FeL2, FeL3 films. .
Polymers
Operation voltage
V)
Transmittance change (ΔT,
%)
Bleaching time (t
s)
b
,
Coloration time (t
s)
c
,
Charge/discharge amount (Q
d
,
Coloration efficiency (CE,
mC⋅cmꢀ
2
)
cm ⋅C
2
ꢀ 1
)
(
FeL1
FeL2
FeL3
0–1.4 V
0–1.3 V
0–1.2 V
71
76
66
4.1
2.8
1.6
1.0
0.7
0.4
2.47/1.76
2.28/1.51
2.35/1.24
458
481
440
a
All the measurements were performed in three-electrode systems.
polymers FeL2, FeL3 by using L2 and L3 as organic ligands,
investigate the water solubility of these three coordination polymers, we
put powder samples of them in the water, respectively. As shown in
Fig. S17, after few minutes, the color of the water in samples based on
FeL1 and FeL2 become obvious purple, which determined their certain
water solubility, respectively. In contrast, FeL3 exhibited superior
durability in water, which may enable its aqueous electrolyte
compatibility.
respectively.
3
. Results and discussion
As shown in Scheme 2, the synthesis of three terpyridine ligands with
different alkylchain linkers was achieved via alkylation reaction from a
key intermediate 3, which was prepared by the reported method pre-
viously [56,57]. Three Fe(II) complexes in their tetrafluoroborate form
were prepared by coordination reaction between the ditopic terpyridine
Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of the above-obtained thin films
deposited on ITO glass by spin coating method was carried out in a
three-electrode electrochemical system, in which the polymer films on
ITO as working electrode, Pt wire as the counter electrode, Ag/AgCl as
the reference electrode, respectively. Due to the different water solubi-
lity of these three new coordination polymers, the CV of thin films of
ligands and FeBF
4
⋅6H
2
O in high yield, which were denoted as FeL1,
FeL2, FeL3, respectively. It is note that the target complexes were
washed by a variety of solvents to remove the species with low molec-
ular weight. The structures of desired organic ligands were confirmed by
FeL1 and FeL2 were tested in CH containing 0.1 M tetrabuty-
4
lammonium tetrafluoroborate (Bu NBF ) as a supporting electrolyte,
2
Cl
2
1
13
H and C NMR spectroscopy (Figs. S1–S8) and mass spectrometry. The
4
target Fe(II) coordination polymers were characterized by Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). As shown in Figs. S9–S11, all
these three samples exhibited similar signals among the region of
while that of FeL3 was tested in an aqueous electrolyte of 0.1 M lithium
tetrafluoroborate (LiBF ). As shown in Fig. 3, one pair redox waves were
4
ꢀ
1
ꢀ 1
observed under different scan rate from 10 mV s to 100 mV s , which
revealed a reversible redox characteristic of Fe(II)/Fe(III) couple
[58–60]. The anodic (Epa) and cathodic peak potential (Epc) values of
FeL1 and FeL2 are quite same, around +1.2 V and +1.0 V, respectively,
suggesting their same electric cloudy environment of metal ion. The Epa
and Epc values of FeL3 are +0.9 V and +0.7 V, respectively. Further-
more, the values of Epa and Epc are dependent on the scan rate and
increased in a linear and proportional fashion (Fig. S18). The minimum
ꢀ 1
1
000–1600 cm , which were attributed from their similar coordination
ꢀ
moities (terpyridine) and anions (BF
4
). X-ray photoelectron spectros-
copy (XPS) analysis of these three samples were shown in Figs. S12–S13.
The peaks at 193, 285, 400, 685, 708–721 eV indicated that the presence
of B, C, N, F and Fe elements in these complexes, respectively. Moreover,
the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results shown in Fig. S14 indi-
cated good thermostability of these complexes.
2
With three desired Fe(II) coordination polymers in hand, we firstly
characterized their absorption spectra in dichloromethane solutions,
respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, FeL1, FeL2 and FeL3 exhibited two
distinct absorption bands: the longer wavelength absorption band in the
visible region (500–650 nm) that can be assigned to an MLCT transition
from the Fe2 ion to terpyridine moiety; the shorter wavelength ab-
mean square errors (R ) was quite close to 1.0, which indicated that the
electrochemical process was controlled by faradic reaction on the sur-
face, implying pseudocapacitive behavior of these materials [61–63].
We then focused on the investigation of the electrochromic proper-
ties of the present coordination polymer FeL1, FeL2 and FeL3. The
UV–Vis absorption spectra and the colour change were monitored dur-
ing the regulation of applied voltage at room temperature. As shown in
Fig. 4, with increase of the working potential gradually, the absorption
intensity around 574 nm corresponding to the typical MLCT band in Fe
(II)-bis-terpyridine complexes decreased clearly and even disappeared at
1.4 V, 1.3 V and 1.2 V for FeL1, FeL2 and FeL3, respectively. Mean-
while, a new absorption peak around 410 nm was observed accompa-
nying the increase of the absorption intensity for each sample, resulting
in the color change from purple to yellow. The electrochromic phe-
nomenon was associated with the oxidation process of metal center in
these new coordination polymers and thus lead to the change of electron
transition. Moreover, FeL1, FeL2, FeL3, even possessing different
linkers, showed nearly the same color change from purple to yellow,
which further demonstrated that the present strategy for molecular
engineering of Fe(II) coordination polymers by employing nonconju-
gated linkers can be easy to design the customized electrochromics.
We further investigated the optical electrochromism by chro-
noamperometry with putting on square-wave potential between 0 and
1.4 V for FeL1, 1.3 V for FeL2, 1.2 V for FeL3, respectively. The trans-
mittance changes around 574 nm were monitored, and the detailed data
were summarized in Table 1. As shown in Fig. 5, the sample FeL1
+
sorption band in the UV region (350–400 nm) is originated from the
π-π*
electron transitions of the ditopic organic ligand. There was no obvious
difference between the absorption spectra of FeL1, FeL2 and FeL3,
which implied that the configuration and electronic structure of their
coordination center should not be affected by the length of non-
conjugated alkylchain linkers. Moreover, thin films of these three new
Fe(II) coordination polymers deposited on ITO via spin-coating process
performed fine absorption peaks similar to those in solution, suggesting
that the negligible intermolecular energy transfer existed in their thin
film states, respectively.
We also investigated the surface morphologies of the as-prepared
coordination polymer films by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
analysis. As shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. S15, all these samples showed
uniform morphologies with high surface coverage. Different from the
compact thin film of FeL1, FeL2 and FeL3 thin films exhibited obvious
poroid morphologies. The result indicated the microstructures of thin
films of these new type coordination polymers can be tuned by changing
the nonconjugated linkers, while their absorption properties remained
the same (Fig. 1). X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization of these three
thin films suggested their lower crystallinities (Fig. S16). Moreover, we
studied the hydrophobic properties of thin films of these three Fe(II)
coordination polymers by contact angle measurement. As shown in
Fig. 2, water contact angles of these three samples increased in the order
c
exhibited an optical contrast of 71%, with coloration (t ) and bleaching
b
(t ) time of 4.1 and 1.0 s, respectively. Interestingly, the sample FeL2
performed a high optical contrast of 76%, that is the highest value
among the reported electrochromic materials based on Fe(II) complexes
up to date (Table S1). Moreover, shorter response times in both
◦
◦
◦
of FeL1 (68 ) < FeL2 (79 ) < FeL3 (90 ), associated with the length of
their corresponding alkylchain linkers, respectively. To further
5