HOMO level at ꢀ5.35 eV, a similar narrow bandgap of
1.55 eV and a similar broad visible absorption in comparison
with PBDTTTs. The PSC based on PBDPTT-C as a donor
and PC70BM as an acceptor with a weight ratio of 1 : 2,
w/w showed a high PCE of 5.21% with a higher Voc of
0.82 V. Moreover, even higher Voc can be expected if the
fluorine-substituted thieno[3,4-b]thiophene, like that used in
PBDTTT-CF,4 was used in the copolymer. Furthermore,
since the photovoltaic properties of conjugated polymers are
susceptible to molecular structural changes, even a very little
change in their side chain can make big difference in photo-
voltaic properties. Further optimization of the molecular
structure would be necessary to fully explore the potential of
the copolymers (PBDPTTs) of BDP and TT. Therefore,
PBDPTTs should be another type of promising high perfor-
mance photovoltaic polymer donor materials for PSCs.
This work was financially supported by NSFC (No.
20874106, 20821120293, 50633050, and 20721061) and National
Science Foundation (CHE-0822573).
Fig. 3 I–V curve of the PSC device based on PBDPTT-C under
illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cmꢀ2
.
the illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cmꢀ2, the device
exhibited an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.82 V, a short
circuit current (Jsc) of 11.76 mA cmꢀ2, a fill factor (FF) of
0.54, and a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.21%. As
listed in Table 1, benefitting from the deeper HOMO level
value, the Voc of the device based on PBDPTT-C is higher
than that of the PSCs based on PBDTTTs.4 Since the length of
alkyl side chains and the molecular weight influence the
photovoltaic properties of a conjugated polymer greatly, the
alkyl side chains and the molecular weight of PBDPTT-C
should be optimized further to explore its photovoltaic properties
fully. For example, different side chains, like octyl, dodecyl,
or 2-ethyl-hexyl, can be used to get an optimized molecular
structure.
Notes and references
1 (a) D. Muhlbacher, Scharber, M. Morana, Z. Zhu, D. Waller,
¨
R. Gaudiana and C. Brabec, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 2884;
(b) Y. Chen, S. Yang and C. Hsu, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 5868;
(c) J. Chen and Y. Cao, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 1709.
2 (a) J. Hou, H. Chen, S. Zhang, G. Li and Y. Yang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 16144; (b) L. Huo, H.-Y. Chen, J. Hou, T. Chen
and Y. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2009, 5570.
3 S. Park, A. Roy, S. Beaupre, S. Cho, N. Coates, J. Moon,
D. Moses, M. Leclerc, K. Lee and A. Heeger, Nat. Photonics,
2009, 3, 297..
From the external quantum efficiency (EQE) plot of the
PSC based on PBDPTT-C/PC70BM (3% additive), as shown
in Fig. 4, it can be seen that the device has a broad response
range in the whole visible range, from 380 nm to 780 nm,
which is much similar to the PSC devices based on the
PBDTTTs. However, the maximum EQE value of PBDPTT-C-
based PSC device, which is near to 50%, is lower than the best
value of ca. 70% for the PBDTTT-based PSCs, which agrees
with the lower Jsc of the device based on PBDPTT-C in
comparison with that of the PBDTTTs-based devices.
In conclusion, a new thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-based LBG
polymer, PBDPTT-C, was synthesized for the application as
donor material in PSCs. PBDPTT-C exhibited a deeper
4 H. Chen, J. Hou, S. Zhang, Y. Liang, G. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Yu,
Y. Wu and G. Li, Nat. Photonics, 2009, 3, 649.
5 (a) L. Huo, J. Hou, S. Zhang, H. Chen and Y. Yang, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1500; (b) L. Huo, X. Guo, S. Zhang,
Y. Li and J. Hou, Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 4035.
6 Y. Liang, D. Feng, Y. Wu, S. Tsai, G. Li, C. Ray and L. Yu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 7792.
7 Y. Liang, Z. Xu, J. Xia, S. Tsai, Y. Wu, G. Li, C. Ray and L. Yu,
Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 135.
8 (a) H. Zhou, L. Yang, S. Price, K. Knight and W. You, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 7992; (b) S. Xiao, A. Stuart, S. Liu and
W. You, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2009, 1, 1613.
9 E. Wang, L. Hou, Z. Wang, S. Hellstrom, F. Zhang, O. Inganas
¨
and M. Andersson, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 5240.
¨
10 C. Piliego, T. Holcombe, J. Douglas, C. Woo, P. Beaujuge and
J. Frechet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7595.
11 M. Scharber, D. Muhlbacher, M. Koppe, P. Denk, C. Waldauf,
¨
A. Heeger and C. Brabec, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 789.
12 G. Dennler, M. Scharber and C. Brabec, Adv. Mater., 2009,
21, 1323.
13 J. Hou, H. Chen, S. Zhang, R. Chen, Y. Yang, Y. Wu and
G. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 15586.
14 J. Hou, M. Park, S. Zhang, Y. Yao, L. Chen, J. Li and Y. Yang,
Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 6012.
15 L. Huo, J. Hou, H. Chen, S. Zhang, Y. Jiang, T. Chen and
Y. Yang, Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 6564.
16 N. Kleinhenz, L. Yang, H. Zhou, S. Price and W. You,
Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 872.
17 Y. Li, Y. Cao, J. Gao, D. Wang, G. Yu and A. Heeger, Synth.
Met., 1999, 99, 243.
18 J. Peet, J. Kim, N. Coates, W. Ma, D. Moses, A. Heeger and
G. Bazan, Nat. Mater., 2007, 6, 497.
Fig. 4 EQE curves of the PSCs based on PBDPTT-C.
c
8852 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8850–8852
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011