1
150
Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., Vol. 69, No. 6, June, 2020
Rodlovskaya and Vasnev
N, 13.52; S, 15.47. MS (EI, 70 eV), m/z (I (%)): 415 [M + H]+
2. J. Wu, L. Wang, H. Yu, Zain-ul-Abdin, R. U. Khan, M. Haroon,
J. Organomet. Chem., 2017, 828, 38—51; DOI: 10.1016/j.
jorganchem.2016.10.041.
3. N. D. Kirchhofer, Z. D. Rengert, F. W. Dahlquist, T.-Q.
Nguyen, G. C. Bazan, Chem, 2017, 2, 240—257; DOI:
10.1016/j.chempr.2017.01.001.
4. Z. Wang, H. Tian, K. Chen, Dyes Pigm., 2001, 51, 161—165;
DOI: 10.1016/S0143-7208(01)00058-4.
5. Y.-W. Huang, N.-Y. Fu, Chin. Chim. Lett., 2011, 22,
1301—1304; DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2011.05.039.
6. A. M. El-Zohry, J. Cong, M. Karlsson, L. Kloo, B. Zietz,
Dyes Pigm., 2016, 132, 360—368; DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.
2016.05.021.
7. S. Prabu, E. David, T. Viswanathan, J. S. A. Jinisha, R. Malik,
K. R. Maiyelvaganan, M. Prakash, N. Palanisami, J. Mol.
Struct., 2020, 1202, 127302; DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.
127302.
8. S. Kaur, M. Kaur, P. Kaur, K. Clays, K. Singh, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 2017, 343, 185—219; DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.05.008.
9. R. Teimuri-Mofrad, K. Rahimpour, R. Ghadari, S. Ahmadi-
Kandjani, J. Mol. Liq., 2017, 244, 322—329; DOI: 10.1016/j.
molliq.2017.09.002.
10. D. Brunel, G. Noirbent, F. Dumur, Dyes Pigm., 2019, 170,
107611; DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107611.
rel
–
1
(
(
100). IR, /cm : 3320 (N—Hval), 2220 (CN), 1530 (Ar), 1280
1
N—Hdef), 1090 (C—Oval). H NMR, : 6.60 (s, 2 H, thiophene),
7
.32 (br.s, 4 H, NH ), 7.70 (d, 4 H, Ar , J = 2.8 Hz), 7.80 (d, 4 H,
2
Ar , J = 2.8 Hz).
4
,4´-(9H-Fluorene-2,7-diyl)bis(2-aminothiophene-3-carbo-
nitrile) (4) was synthesized from 1,9-diacetylfluorene bis-ylidene-
malononitrile (3.46 g, 0.01 mol). Yield 3.20 g (77%), m.p.
2
56—258 C. Found (%): C, 67.19; H, 3.59; N, 13.59; S, 16.77.
C23H14N S . Calculated (%): C, 67.29; H, 3.44; N, 13.65;
4
2
+
S, 15.62. MS (EI, 70 eV), m/z (I (%)): 411 [M + H] (100).
IR, /cm : 3330 (N—Hval), 2925 (CH2(val)), 2220 (CN), 1540
rel
–
1
1
(
Ar), 1370 (CH2(def)), 1280 (N—Hdef). H NMR, : 4.09 (s, 2 H,
CH ), 6.60 (s, 2 H, thiophene), 7.30 (br.s, 4 H, NH ), 7.97
2
2
(
s, 2 H, Ar), 8.13 (d, 4 H, Ar, J = 2.6 Hz).
Synthesis of polyazomethines 5—8 bearing ferrocene and
nitrile-thiophene groups (general procedure). A mixture of 1,1´-di-
acetylferrocene (1.5 mmol), the appropriate arylenebis(2-amino-
thiophene-3-carbonitrile) (1.5 mmol), and toluene (20 mL) was
refluxed with a Dean—Stark trap for 1 h to remove water. The
reaction mixture was cooled, the polymer was collected by filtra-
tion, washed with toluene, and purified by liquid—solid extrac-
tion with acetone using a Soxhlet apparatus.
Polymer 5 was synthesized from monomer 1 (0.483 g, 1.5 mmol)
and 1,1´-diacetylferrocene (0.405 g, 1.5 mmol). Yield 0.74 g
11. S. S. Sajadikhah, E. Jazinizadeh, Chem. Heterocycl. Compd.,
2018, 54, 1020; DOI: 10.1007/s10593-018-2384-x.
12. H. Gu, S. Mu, G. Qiu, X. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Yuan, D. Astruc,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2018, 364, 51—85; DOI: 10.1016/j.
ccr.2018.03.013.
13. M. Saleem, H. Yu, L. Wang, Zain-ul-Abdin, H. Khalid,
M. Akram, N. M. Abbasi, J. Huang, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2015,
876, 9—25; DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.01.012.
1
(
89%), ηlog = 0.12 dL g– , temperature at which 5% loss of the
sample weight occur Td5 = 340 C. IR, /cm– : 690 (N—H),
390 (C—N) 1560 (Ar), 1735 (C=O of terminal groups), 2240
1
1
(
,
CN), 3340 (N—H).
Polymer 6 was synthesized from monomer 2 (0.483 g, 1.5 mmol)
and 1,1´-diacetylferrocene (0.405 g, 1.5 mmol). Yield 0.88 g
93%), ηlog = 0.11 dL g– , Td5 = 350 C. IR, /cm : 700
1
–1
(
(
N—H), 1390 (C—Namide), 1560 (Ar), 1730 (C=O of terminal
groups), 2230 (CN), 3340 (N—H).
14. T. L. Gilchrist, Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2nd ed., Longman
Scientific & Technical, London, 1992, 396 pp.
15. K. Gewald, Chimia, 1980, 34, 101.
Polymer 7 was synthesized from monomer 3 (0.621 g, 1.5 mmol)
and 1,1´-diacetylferrocene (0.405 g, 1.5 mmol). Yield 0.9 g (92%),
16. N. N. Makhova, L. I. Belen´kii, G. A. Gazieva, I. L. Dalinger,
L. S. Konstantinova, V. V. Kuznetsov, A. N. Kravchen-
ko, M. M. Krayushkin, O. A. Rakitin, A. M. Starosot-
nikov, L. L. Fershtat, S. A. Shevelev, V. Z. Shirinian, V. N.
Yarovenko, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2020, 89, 55; DOI: 10.1070/
RCR4914.
17. R. A. Dvorikova, A. S. Peregudov, A. A. Korlyukov, M. I.
Buzin, I. V. Nagornova, V. A. Vasnev, Russ. Chem. Bull., 2019,
68, 1435; DOI: 10.1007/s11172-019-2573-5.
–
1
–1
ηlog = 0.17 dL g , Td5 = 320 C. IR, /cm : 680 (N—H), 1380
(
C—N), 1560 (Ar), 1735 (C=O of terminal groups), 2240, 3340 (N—H).
Polymer 8 was synthesized from monomer 4(0.621 g, 1.5 mmol) and
1
=
,1´-diacetylferrocene (0.405 g, 1.5 mmol). Yield 0.9 g (93%),
=
log
–1
–1
0.18 dL g , Td5 = 300 C. IR, /cm : 690 (N—H), 1390 (C—N),
1
560 (Ar), 1735 (C=O of terminal groups), 2220, 3360 (N—H).
NMR spectra were recorded and elemental analyses
were performed using financial support from the Ministry
of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
on the equipment of the Center for Molecule Composition
Studies of INEOS RAS.
18. D. M. Barnes, A. R. Haight, T. Hameury, M. A. McLaughlin,
J. Mei, J. S. Tedrow, J. D. R. Toma, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62,
11311—11319; DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.07.008.
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 18-03-00892).
References
1
. J. Riquelme, C. Garzón, C. Bergmann, J. Geshev, R. Quijada,
Eur. Polym. J., 2016, 75, 200—209; DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.
015.12.007.
Received December 18, 2019;
in revised form April 12, 2020;
accepted April 14, 2020
2