S.-Y. Kim et al.
Dyes and Pigments 191 (2021) 109362
(0.37 g). Mp 238 ◦C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 8.19 (d, J = 7.5
Hz, 2H), 8.17 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.95 (d, J =
8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.55 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 8H), 7.26 (d, J
= 8.5 Hz, 4H), 7.19 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 8H). 13C{1H} (125 MHz, CDCl3,
ppm): δ 150.2, 144.2, 141.0, 139.2, 136.6, 134.5, 134.4, 133.7, 132.4,
130.7, 127.7, 126.5, 124.8, 123.2, 118.8, 106.2. GC-MS Calculated for
concentrations for both the target analyte o-NA and Py-R compounds
using Sinco Mega-2100 and the fluorescence emission measurements
were performed by gradually increasing o-NA concentration (2.0 ×
10ꢀ 4 M ꢀ 1.8 × 10ꢀ 3 M) at a Py-R concentration of 10
μM in DCM
solvent under an argon atmosphere using Shimadzu fluorometer (RF-
6000). In order to induce fluorescence quenching by o-NA, excitation
was performed at λex = 310 nm, and their corresponding emission
wavelength was monitored from λem = 441–536 nm (from Py-CN to Py-
OMe). For o-NA sensor response was defined as I0/I - 1. Stern-Volmer
constants (Ksv) (Mꢀ 1) were calculated by Stern-Volmer equation, (I0/
I) = 1 + Ksv [Q], where [Q] is the molar concentration of o-NA. The limit
of detection (LOD) was calculated as follows: limit of detection equation
C
56H32N6 [M]+: 788.27 g/mol, Found [M]+: 788.3 g/mol. Anal.
Calculated for C56H32N6: C, 85.29; H, 4.13; N, 10.62. Found: C, 85.19; H,
4.23; N, 10.62.
Py-F. Greenish yellow powder (eluent DCM/n-hexane = 1:3). Yield:
78% (0.39 g). Mp 295 ◦C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 8.26 (d, J
= 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.18 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 8.04 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 4H), 7.20–7.19 (m, 4H), 7.18–7.16
(m, 8H), 7.04 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 8H). 13C{1H} (125 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ
160.0, 158.0, 147.2, 143.8, 131.4, 130.2, 128.8, 127.7, 127.3, 126.3,
125.3, 125.2, 124.4, 122.0, 116.1. GC-MS Calculated for C52H32F4N2
[M]+: 760.25 g/mol, Found [M]+: 760.3 g/mol. Anal. Calculated for
= 3σ/K. Where σ is the standard deviation and K is the slope between
fluorescence versus o-NA concentration. The linear equation obtained
from Stern-Volmer plot is y = 0.00345x-0.31462 (R = 0.992).
3. Results and discussion
C
52H32F4N2: C, 82.09; H, 4.24; N, 3.68. Found: C, 82.19; H, 4.14; N,
3.78.
3.1. Synthesis of Py-R compounds
Py-H. Greenish yellow powder (eluent DCM/n-hexane = 1:3). Yield:
75% (0.35 g). Mp 286 ◦C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 8.38 (d, J
= 9.5 Hz, 2H), 8.33 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (d,
J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 7.33 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 8H), 7.28
(d, J = 9.0 Hz, 4H), 7.26–7.25 (m, 8H), 7.08 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H). 13C{1H}
(125 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 147.8, 147.1, 137.8, 136.4, 135.1, 131.4,
129.3, 127.9, 127.6, 127.4, 124.8, 124.6, 124.3, 123.3, 123.1. GC-MS
Calculated for C52H36N2 [M]+: 688.29 g/mol, Found [M]+: 688.5 g/
mol. Anal. Calculated for C52H36N2: C, 90.65; H, 5.24; N, 4.12. Found: C,
90.55; H, 5.34; N, 4.12.
Scheme 1 shows the synthetic procedure used to produce a series of
pyrene based D-A-D compounds, 1,6-bis[(N,N-p-(R)-diphenylamino)
phenyl]pyrene (R = CN (Py-CN), F (Py-F), H (Py-H), Me (Py-Me), and
OMe (Py-OMe)). Initially, the precursor for the acceptor unit 1,6-bis
(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyrene (Py-B(pin)) and
the precursor for donor units with various electron-donating (EDGs) or
withdrawing groups (EWGs) at the para-positions of triphenylamine
(TPA), 4-bromo-N,N-bis(p-(R)-phenyl)aniline, were prepared according
as previously reported [35,36]. As shown in Scheme 1, Py-B(pin) was
synthesized by a Ni(dppp)Cl2 catalytic coupling reaction of 1,6-dibro-
mopyrene and 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane. Then, the pyr-
ene based D-A-D compounds were successfully synthesized using the
modified Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction using Py-B(pin) and 2
molar ratios of 4-bromo-N,N-bis(p-(R)-phenyl)aniline. The Py-R com-
pounds were purified by silica gel column chromatography using
n-hexane/dichloromethane (DCM) mixtures as eluents and further pu-
rified by recrystallization. The molecular structures of all compounds
were characterized by 1H and 13C{1H} NMR and elemental analysis.
Detailed synthetic procedures and characterization data are provided in
the Experimental Section and Supplementary data.
Py-Me. Greenish yellow powder (eluent DCM/n-hexane = 1:2).
Yield: 85% (0.37 g). Mp 293 ◦C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 8.28
(d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H),
7.98 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 7.19 (d, J = 9.0 Hz,
4H), 7.13 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 16H), 2.35 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} (125 MHz, CDCl3,
ppm): δ 147.4, 145.3, 137.6, 134.1, 132.7, 131.2, 130.2, 129.9, 128.8,
127.7, 127.2, 125.4, 124.9, 124.4, 122.0, 20.8. GC-MS Calculated for
C
56H44N2 [M]+: 744.35 g/mol, Found [M]+: 744.4 g/mol. Anal.
Calculated for C56H44N2: C, 90.27; H, 5.97; N, 3.79. Found: C, 90.22; H,
5.92; N, 3.89.
Py-OMe. Bright yellow powder (eluent DCM/n-hexane = 1:1). Yield:
88% (0.48 g). Mp 228 ◦C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 8.28 (d, J
= 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.16 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.02 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.97 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 4H), 7.19 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 8H), 7.10
(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 6.88 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 8H), 3.82 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} (125
MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 155.9, 147.9, 140.9, 137.5, 131.1, 130.1, 128.8,
127.2, 126.7, 125.4, 124.3, 120.0, 114.78, 114.75, 114.72, 55.5. GC-MS
Calculated for C56H44N2O4 [M]+: 808.33 g/mol, Found [M]+: 808.4 g/
mol. Anal. Calculated for C56H44N2O4: C, 83.16; H, 5.45; N, 3.49; O,
7.94. Found: C, 83.06; H, 5.55; N, 3.44; O, 7.89.
3.2. Photophysical properties
As shown in Fig. 1, steady-state UV–visible absorption and fluores-
cence spectra were measured both in solution and film states. Spectral
parameters are summarized in Table 1. UV–vis absorption spectra
showed structured and relatively intense absorption bands in the range
260–325 nm, which were attributed to π-π* transitions of substituted
triphenylamine (TPA) and pyrene core (Fig. S4). Broad relatively weak
absorption bands in the range 350–450 nm were attributed to intra-
molecular charge transfer (ICT) in the ground state from TPA (donor) to
pyrene (acceptor). In addition, since TPA was located at the 1,6-posi-
2.3. Density functional theory calculations
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using
the Gaussian’16 software package. Full geometry optimizations in their
ground state were performed using the B3LYP functional and the 6-31G
(d,p) basis set for all atoms. The excitation energies and oscillator
strengths for the lowest 100 singlet–singlet transitions at the optimized
geometry in the ground state were obtained in time-dependent DFT (TD-
DFT) calculations using the same basis set and functional as for the
ground state. All Isodensity plots of the frontier orbitals were visualized
by Chem3D Ultra and GaussView softwares. More detail DFT/TD-DFT
calculation results for Py-R were described in Supplementary data.
tions of the active sites of pyrene with notable π-conjugation effect, it
was confirmed that charge transfer occurs more readily in the ground
state [38,39]. We compared the absorption wavelength bands of the
Py-R compounds, to understand substituent effects. It was found that the
low-energy band is relatively more affected than the high-energy band
by the para-substituted TPA. In this context, comparisons of the ab-
sorption wavelength maxima of charge transfer bands showed absorp-
tion peak changes depended on substituents. On moving from
electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) to electron-donating groups
(EDGs), absorption peaks were red-shifted in the following order CN < F
< H < Me < OMe. Steady-state absorption spectral comparisons be-
tween Py-CN and the other compounds revealed Py-CN had a unique
spectrum, due to the strong electron-withdrawing substituent character
of the CN group. This phenomenon is further addressed in the DFT
2.4. Chemosensor
The UV–vis absorption spectra were measured at 10
μM
3