K.-i. Shimizu et al.
ty of methoxyacetonitrile (Table 2, entry 11) and methoxy-
propionitrile (Table 2, entry 17); a linear nitrile with a
heteroACHTUNGTRENNUNGatom adjacent to the b carbon of the CN group
hydration involves a negative charge at the a-carbon atom
adjacent to the pyridine ring. Taking the Michaelis–Menten-
type kinetics (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information)
and the absence of the H2O/D2O kinetic isotopic effects into
account, the positive 1 value indicates that nucleophilic ad-
dition of OHdÀ on CeO2 to a nitrile carbon atom through a
negatively charged transition state is a rate-determining
step. Based on the above-mentioned mechanistic results, a
possible reaction mechanism of nitrile hydration by CeO2 is
shown in Scheme 2. The catalytic cycle starts with dissocia-
tion of H2O on CeO2 to give Hd+ and OHdÀ (Step 1). Nitrile
and CeO2 are in equilibrium with the nitrile–CeO2 adsorp-
tion complex (Step 2). This nitrile–CeO2 complex will under-
go an addition of OHdÀ to a nitrile carbon atom to give the
amide, accompanied by a regeneration of the adsorption site
on CeO2 (Step 3). Step 3 is the rate-determining step.
(Table 2, entry 17) was completely inactive, whereas that
with a heteroatom adjacent to the a carbon of the CN
group (Table 2, entry 11) was hydrated to the corresponding
amides with good yield (77%). Taking all results into ac-
count, we concluded that CeO2 acts as a highly substrate-
specific catalyst for the hydration of nitriles; the catalyst is
effective only for the nitriles with a heteroatom (N or O)
adjacent to the a carbon of the CN group. To the best of
our knowledge, our results provide the first example of the
highly substrate-specific catalysis by an unmodified and non-
porous metal oxide surface. To discuss the origin of this sub-
strate specificity, Arrhenius parameters for CeO2-catalyzed
reactions of 2-cyanopyridine and 4-cyanopyridine were com-
pared (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). These
activation energies for 2-cyanopyridine (81.7 kJmolÀ1) and
4-cyanopyridine (80.7 kJmolÀ1) were identical within the ex-
perimental error, which indicated the same reaction mecha-
nism for these nitriles. On the other hand, surprisingly, the
frequency factor A for 2-cyanopyridine (lnA=31.7) was five
orders of magnitude larger than that for 4-cyanopyridine
(lnA=19.3), which indicated that the observed difference in
the reactivity of 2-cyanopyridine and 4-cyanopyridine is ex-
plained by a larger frequency factor of 2-cyanopyridine.
To discuss the mechanism, we carried out kinetic studies.
First, the dependence of the reaction rate on the 2-cyanopyr-
idine concentration was examined (see Figure S3 in the Sup-
porting Information). Initially, the rate of amide formation
linearly increases with an increase in the concentration of
the nitrile (0.1–0.4m) and then levels off at higher concen-
tration. A good linear correlation is observed in a Linewea-
ver–Burk plot, indicating that the reaction follows Michae-
lis–Menten-type kinetics. This suggests that the free nitrile
and an adsorption site on CeO2 are in equilibrium with the
nitrile–CeO2 adsorption complex as a reaction intermediate,
which is then irreversibly converted to give the product ac-
companied by regeneration of the adsorption site on CeO2,
and the latter step is the rate-determining step. The reaction
in H2O or D2O at 308C showed the absence of the kinetic
isotopic effect (kH/kD =0.95), which indicated that H2O dis-
sociation is fast on CeO2 and is not involved in the rate-de-
termining step. Considering the ionic nature of CeO2, one
assumes that H2O is highly polarized on CeO2 to yield Hd+
and OHdÀ adspecies. Note that the reaction rate at 308C did
not depend on the O2 concentration in the reaction atmos-
phere; the rates under O2 (18.7 mmolgÀ1 hÀ1), under air
(20.1 mmolgÀ1 hÀ1), and under N2 (18.8 mmolgÀ1 hÀ1) were
nearly constant. This indicates that O2 is not involved in the
catalytic cycle. Using the results in Table 2 (entries 3, 5, 7,
and 9), we examined the relationship between the relative
rates and the Hammett parameter (s) for the hydration of
2-cyanopyridines (see Figure S4 in the Supporting Informa-
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism for hydration of nitriles with CeO2.
In Scheme 2, we assume that in the 2-cyanopyridine–
CeO2 adsorption complex the heteroatom (N) adjacent to
the a carbon of the CN group is coordinated to the surface
Ce site. This adsorption model is reasonable from the fol-
lowing discussions. A pyridine adsorption IR experiment[29]
showed bands at 1440, 1485, and 1593 cmÀ1 due to coordina-
tively bound pyridine on the Lewis acid (surface Ce cation).
No bands due to a pyridinium ion, formed by the adsorption
of pyridine on a Brønsted acid, were observed. Although
the N atom of the CN group can be also adsorbed on the Ce
cation, adsorption of the N atom of the pyridine ring should
be more preferable due to the higher basicity of the latter
species. Taking into account the above reaction mechanism,
the origin of substrate-specific catalysis of CeO2 is discussed
as follows. From the results in Table 2, we concluded that
the catalyst shows higher reactivity to the nitriles with a het-
eroatom adjacent to the a carbon of the CN group (such as
2-cyanopyridine) than the other nitriles (such as 4-cyanopyr-
idine: a nitrile with a heteroatom adjacent to the g carbon
of the CN group). The 2-cyanopyridine–CeO2 adsorption
complex, in which the heteroatom (N) adjacent to the a
carbon of the CN group is coordinated to the surface Ce
site (Scheme 2), should make the position of the CN group
of 2-cyanopyridine closer to the surface active sites of CeO2
than that of 4-cyanopyridine. This difference in the adsorp-
tion complex should lead to the larger frequency factor for
tion). There was a fairly good linearity between logACTHNUTRGNE(UNG kX/kH)
and s which gave a positive slope (1=0.58), and indicated
that a transition state in the rate-determining step of nitrile
11430
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11428 – 11431