Scheme 1
.
Synthesis of ꢀ-Dipeptides 4, 7, and 8. Structure of Peptide 9
6
been described for oxanorbornene ꢀ-peptides, and for
Compounds 4, 7, and 8 were synthesized as described in
Scheme 1. Trans-derivative 1 was prepared by epimerization
of the cis-isomer as previously described in the literature.
7
peptides derived from nucleoside ꢀ-amino acids. In the last
2,3
10
two cases, a conformationally constrained ring and ꢀ -trans-
stereochemistry is a common structural feature which ac-
counts for the propensity to fold into a 8-helix.
Monoprotected cis-intermediates 3 and 6 had been already
8
,11
prepared in our laboratory.
Removal of the N-Boc
We have recently described the formation of intraresidue
hydrogen bonds affording cis-fused [4.2.0]octane structural
units in ꢀ-dipeptides made up by monomers derived from
cis-2-aminocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid. One example of
these ꢀ-dipeptides is compound (cis,cis)-9 in Scheme 1. This
protection in 1 under treatment with TFA and triethylsilane
afforded amine 5 in 89% yield. Amine 5 was coupled with
acid 6 in the presence of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-
ethylcarbodiimide (EDAC) as a dehydrating agent and
hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) as a catalyst providing 7 in
8
substructure is retained in a related tetramer, which adopts
4
4% yield. Similarly, acid 2 was reacted with amine 5 to
9
a strand-mimicking secondary structure in solution.
give 8 in 42% yield. Alternatively, saponification of the
methyl ester in 1 with diluted NaOH provided acid 2 in 95%
yield. Subsequent coupling of acid 2 with amine 3 in the
presence of pentafluorophenyl diphenylphosphinate (FDPP)
afforded 4 in 90% yield showing the efficiency of FDPP in
peptide coupling reactions.
In this Letter we report on our preliminary results on the
synthesis and structural study of a new family of cyclobutane
ꢀ
-dipeptides. They consist of two monomers of trans
stereochemistry, (trans,trans)-8, or one cis- and one trans-
monomer, (cis,trans)-7 and (trans,cis)-4 (Scheme 1). The
secondary structures of these compounds in solution have
8
The three new ꢀ-dipeptides 4, 7, and 8 were fully
characterized and their secondary structures in solution were
investigated by using experimental techniques and molecular
modeling (see the Supporting Information). The most
relevant features are listed in Table 1 where one can observe
that the same trends are followed by 4 and 8. Thus, a
complete set of standard 1D and 2D NMR experiments was
been investigated and compared with (cis,cis)-9. The
combined results from NMR experiments and theoretical
calculations show the predominance of an 8- over a
6-membered hydrogen-bonded structure for diastereomers 4
and 8.
(
4) (a) Dado, G. P.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1054.
(
b) Winkler, J. D.; Piatnitski, E. L.; Mehlmann, J.; Kasparec, J.; Axelsen,
1
done for each ꢀ-dipeptide. The high-resolution H NMR
P. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2001, 40, 743. (c) Gademann, K.; H a¨ ne, A.;
Rueping, M.; Jaun, B.; Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1534.
3
spectra in CDCl for 4 and 8 exhibit a high deshielded
chemical shift (8.28-8.47 ppm) for the NH10 proton (com-
pare with the 5.90 ppm value found for 7). That suggests
(
d) Li, X.; Yang, D. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3367, and references therein.
(
(
5) Abele, S.; Seiler, P.; Seebach, D. HelV. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1559.
6) Doerksen, R. J.; Chen, B.; Yuan, J.; Winkler, J. D.; Klein, M. L.
Chem. Commun. 2003, 2534.
7) Threlfall, R.; Davies, A.; Howartz, N. M.; Fisher, J.; Cosstick, R.
Chem. Commun. 2008, 585.
8) Izquierdo, S.; R u´ a, F.; Sbai, A.; Parella, T.; Alvarez-Larena, A.;
Branchadell, V.; Ortu n˜ o, R. M J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7963.
9) R u´ a, F.; Boussert, S.; Parella, T.; D ´ı ez-P e´ rez, I.; Branchadell, V.;
Giralt, E.; Ortu n˜ o, R. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3643.
(
(10) Fernandes, C.; Gauzy, C.; Yang, Y.; Roy, O.; Pereira, E.; Faure,
´
´
(
S.; Aitken, D. J. Synthesis, 2007, 2222.
´
´
(11) Mart ´ı n-Vil a` , M.; Muray, E.; Aguado, G. P.; Alvarez-Larena, A.;
(
Branchadell, V.; Minguill o´ n, C.; Giralt, E.; Ortu n˜ o, R. M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3569
.
2302
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009