3706
J. A. Falenski et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 3703–3706
excess of Fmoc-Ser(b-
D
-Gal(Ac)4)-OH and coupling reagents was re-
tion (AUC) was performed on a XL-I (Beckman-Coulter, Palo Alto,
CA) ultracentrifuge at 25 °C applying the UV–vis absorption op-
tics at 318 nm and using standard 12 mm double sector center
pieces. Sedimentation velocity experiments were performed at
duced to 1.5-fold for the first and 0.5-fold for the second coupling
and reaction time was extended to three hours. A mixture of DBU
and piperidine (2% each) in DMF was used for Fmoc deprotection
(4 ꢁ 5 min). Peptides were cleaved from resin by treatment with
2 mL TFA/TIPS/H2O (90:9:1) for three hours. The resin was washed
twice with TFA (1 mL) and DCM (dry, 1 mL) and excess solvent was
removed by evaporation. The peptides were precipitated with cool
diethyl ether, centrifuged, and dried in vacuum. Glycopeptides were
deacetylated by the treatment with sodium methanolate (20 mM in
methanol, pH 11) over night. Thereafter the pH was adjusted to 4 by
addition of concentrated acetic acid and the solvent was evaporated.
Purification of all peptides was carried out by preparative reversed
60,000 rpm and overall peptide concentrations of 100 lM. The
samples were dissolved in 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.4.
The partial specific volume of the samples was determined in
a density oscillation tube (DMA 5000, Anton Paar, Graz) to be
0.611 ml gꢂ1 for peptide B and 0.715 ml gꢂ1 for peptide B-3/10/
13/14/17/24. The buffer density (
viscosity ( = 0.009243 P), both at 25 °C, were calculated using
the freeware program SEDNTERP
q = 1.010934 g/ml) and buffer
g
16,17
.
The sedimentation velocity
18
data were evaluated using the program SEDFIT yielding the sed-
imentation molar mass distributions shown in Figure 2.
phase HPLC equipped with a Luna™ C8 (10
l, 250 ꢁ 21.20 mm, Phe-
nomenex) column. Eluation solvents were ACN/0.1% TFA and water
Millipore/0.1% TFA. The flow rate was 20 mL minꢂ1. Purified pep-
tides were characterized by analytical HPLC and ESI-MS.
Acknowledgment
We thank the DFG (SFB 765, ‘Multivalency as Chemical Organi-
zation and Action Principle: New Architectures, Functions, and
Applications’) for financial support.
3.3. Concentration determination
Peptide concentrations were estimated by UV spectroscopy
using the absorption maximum at 320 nm of o-aminobenzoic acid
(Abz), which was attached to each N-terminus. A calibration curve
was recorded using different concentrations of H2N-Abz-Gly-
OHꢀHCl. After concentration determination peptide solutions were
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
diluted to yield 100 lM peptide.
3.4. Circular dichroism
References and notes
Peptides were dissolved in phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4,
0.025% NaN3). CD-spectra were recorded on a Jasco-715 spectropo-
larimeter at 20 °C using 0.1 cm Quartz SuprasilÒ cuvettes (Hellma).
Thermal induced denaturations were preformed by recording the
CD-signal at 222 nm upon heating from 10 to 100 °C (3 °C/min).
Elipticity was normalized to concentration (c/mol Lꢂ1), number of
residues (n = 27, including the N-terminal label Abz) and path
length (l/cm) using Eq. 1 where hobs is the measured ellipticity in
millidegrees and [h] the mean residue ellipticity in 103 deg cm2 d-
molꢂ1 residueꢂ1. All measurements were repeated three times and
1. Parry, D. A. D.; Bruce Fraser, R. D.; Squire, J. M. J. Struct. Biol. 2008, 163, 258.
2. Dutch, R. E.; Jardetzky, T. S.; Lamb, R. A. Biosci. Rep. 2000, 20, 597.
3. Varki, A. Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97.
4. Dwek, A. D. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 683.
5. Woolfson, D. N. Adv. Protein Chem. 2005, 70, 79.
6. Pagel, K.; Koksch, B. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 730.
7. Chou, P. Y.; Fasman, G. D. Biochemistry 1974, 13, 222.
8. Zhao, Y. H.; Abraham, M. H.; Zissimos, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7368.
9. Scheike, J. A.; Baldauf, C.; Spengler, J.; Albericio, F.; Pisabarro, M. T.; Koksch, B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7766.
10. Mehta, S.; Meldal, M.; Ferro, V.; Duus, J. Ø.; Bock, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1997, 9, 1365.
11. Vijayalekshmi, S.; George, S. K.; Andersson, L. K.; Kihlberg, J.; Baltzer, L. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 2455.
the average was calculated.
hobs
½hꢃ ¼
ð1Þ
12. Andersson, L. K.; Dolphin, G. T.; Kihlberg, J.; Baltzer, L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2 2000, 3, 459.
10; 000 ꢀ l ꢀ c ꢀ n
13. Andersson, L.; Stenhagen, G.; Baltzer, L. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1366.
14. Beck, K.; Hunter, I.; Engel, J. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 148.
15. Kihlberg, J.; Elofsson, M.; Salvador, L. A. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 289, 221.
3.5. Analytical ultracentrifugation
17. Lebowitz, J.; Lewis, M. S.; Schuck, P. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 2067.
18. Schuck, P. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 1606.
Prior to AUC analysis, the proteins were extensively dialyzed
against phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4) using a SpectraPorÒ-
Membran (MWCO; Carl Roth GmbH). Analytical ultracentrifuga-