[2.2.2]propellane rearrangements

Add time:07/29/2019    Source:sciencedirect.com

Both [2.2.2]propellane and the Cope rearrangement follow reaction paths that pass through singlet diradicaloid portions of the potential energy surface. Here we report the results of applying a variety of methods — CASSCF, PUHF, MUMP2, DFT, UDFT, and CI — that have been suggested as methods for obtaining reliable potential energy surfaces for diradicals. All calculations were done with the same 6-31G* basis to facilitate comparison. The results confirm that [2.2.2]propellane exists and has a substantial barrier to opening to the bicyclic diyl or to dimethylenecyclohexane. The open D3h diyl form is lower in energy than propellane, yet occupies only a shallow well, if it exists at all, before opening to the much more stable dimethylenecyclohexane. CASSCF and a judicious use of DFT give similar results. For the Cope problem, by contrast, the DFT results seem more reliable than the CASSCF results.

We also recommend Trading Suppliers and Manufacturers of 1,4-Dibromobicyclo[2.2.2]octane (cas 10364-04-2). Pls Click Website Link as below: cas 10364-04-2 suppliers

Prev:Nucleophilic substitution at the bridgehead of 1,4-dihalobicyclo[2.2.2]octanes : An abnormal leaving group mobility order
Next:Nucleophilic substitution of protected 2-amino-4-butanoic acid. An easy route to exotic amino acids and conformationally constrained peptides)