Job/Unit: O31206
/KAP1
Date: 30-09-13 11:09:33
Pages: 4
Core Structure of the Marine Sponge Terpene Halichonadin G
50 °C over 30 min to produce coupling product 16 in 74% in halichonadin G. Moreover, all 13C NMR chemical shifts
yield. Hydrogenolysis of the benzyl group in 16 proceeded for the carbon atoms in the IDA moieties of menthyl analog
uneventfully to furnish secondary amine 17 in 87% yield. 19 and halichonadin G (1) are quite similar (Table 2).
In a parallel route, isocyanate 18 was prepared by oxidation
of isocyanide 15 with pyridine N-oxide (PNP) and a cata-
Conclusions
lytic amount of iodine in the presence of 3 Å molecular si-
eves (MS).[14] Finally, reaction of isocyanate 18 with 17 gave
rise to 19, the menthyl analogue of halichonadin G, in 75%
yield after chromatographic purification.
In the study described above, we successfully tested the
chemical features of our proposed biosynthesis of terpenes
related to halichonadin G. In the biomimetic pathway tar-
geted at menthyl analog 19, the core structure of halichona-
din G was constructed by utilizing a Ugi five-center four-
component reaction and an isocyanide oxidation as the two
key steps. The results of this effort serve to support the pro-
posal that Nature utilizes Ugi-type reactions in biosynthetic
pathways to create molecular diversity in natural products.
Studies targeted at the synthesis of halichonadin G are now
underway in our laboratory.
1
A comparison of the H NMR spectroscopic data in the
IDA moieties of natural halichonadin G (1) and menthyl
analog 19 is shown in Table 1. The 1H NMR chemical shift
and coupling properties of the methylene hydrogen atoms
(2ЈЈ-H and 4ЈЈ-H by using halichonadin G numbering) in
the IDA unit of 19 are quite similar to those of 1. The
chemical shifts of the 6-NH and 6Ј-NH amide hydrogen
atoms in halichonadin G (δ = 4.04 and 7.12 ppm) reside
upfield relative to those in menthyl analogue 19 (δ = 5.22
and 7.89 ppm). This phenomenon is presumably a conse-
quence of the shielding effect of the adjacent alkene moiety
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental details and copies of the 1H NMR and 13C
NMR spectra of all relevant compounds.
Table 1. Comparison of selected 1H NMR spectroscopic data[a] for
halichonadin G (1) and model compound 19.
[1] a) Y. Ichikawa, Chem. Lett. 1990, 1347–1350; b) Y. Ichikawa,
Synlett 1991, 715–716; c) Y. Ichikawa, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 1 1992, 2135–2139; d) Y. Ichikawa, M. Yamazaki, M.
Isobe, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 2429–2432; e) Y.
Ichikawa, Y. Matsuda, K. Okumura, M. Nakamura, T. Ma-
suda, H. Kotsuki, K. Nakano, Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2520–2523.
[2] K. Saito, A. Nishimori, H. Kotsuki, K. Nakano, Y. Ichikawa,
Synlett 2013, 24, 757–761.
[3] a) I. Ugi, Angew. Chem. 1982, 94, 826–835; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 810–819; b) A. Dömling, I. Ugi, Angew.
Chem. 2000, 112, 3300–3344; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3168–3210.
[4] D. E. Williams, B. O. Patrick, A. Tahir, R. Van Soest, M. Rob-
erge, R. J. Andersen, J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1752–1754.
[5] M. M. Uy, S. Ohta, M. Yanai, E. Ohta, T. Hirata, S. Ikegami,
Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 731–736.
[6] E. Avilés, A. D. Rodríguez, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5290–5293.
[7] N. Tanaka, S. Suto, H. Ishiyama, T. Kubota, A. Yamano, M.
Shiro, J. Fromont, J. Kobayashi, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3498–
3501.
Position
1
19
δH [ppm] M[b] (J [Hz]) δH [ppm] M[b] (J [Hz])
2ЈЈ
2ЈЈ
4ЈЈ
4.12
3.59
3.92
3.56
7.12
4.04
3.73
d (17.3)
d (17.3)
d (18.1)
d (18.1)
br. d (9.2)
br. d (8.9)
s
4.34[c]
3.94
d (17.9)
d (17.9)
d (16.4)
d (16.4)
br. d (8.6)
br. d (8.6)
s
3.89[c]
3.73
4ЈЈ
6-NH[d]
6Ј-NH[d]
OMe
7.89
5.22
3.76
[8] F. Senejoux, L. Evanno, E. Poupon, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013,
[a] Measured in CDCl3. [b] M = multiplicity. [c] Assignments deter-
mined by HMBC experiments. [d] Assignment of these signals may
be interchangeable.
453–455.
[9] S. Suto, N. Tanaka, J. Fromont, J. Kobayashi, Tetrahedron Lett.
2011, 52, 3470–3473.
[10] H. Ishiyama, A. Hashimoto, J. Fromont, Y. Hoshino, Y. Mi-
kami, J. Kobayashi, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1101–1105.
[11] a) A. Demharter, W. Hörl, E. Herdtweck, I. Ugi, Angew. Chem.
1996, 108, 185–187; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 173–
175; b) I. Ugi, A. Demharter, W. Hörl, T. Schmid, Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 11657–11664.
[12] P. G. M. Wuts, T. W. Greene, Greene’s Protective Groups in Or-
ganic Synthesis 4th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, 2007.
[13] M. Ito, K. Koyakumaru, T. Ohta, H. Takaya, Synthesis 1995,
376–378.
Table 2. Comparison of selected 13C NMR spectroscopic data[a] for
halichonadin G (1) and model compound 19 and their differences
(Δδ).
Position
δC [ppm]
Δδ[b] [ppm]
1
19
1ЈЈ
2ЈЈ
3ЈЈ
4ЈЈ
5ЈЈ
157.7
51.2
171.8
53.8
157.6
50.8
172.2
54.7
0.1
0.4
–0.4
–1.1
0
[14] a) H. W. Johnson, H. C. Krutzsch, J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32,
1939–1941; b) Y. Ichikawa, T. Nishiyama, M. Isobe, J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 4200–4205.
168.8
168.8
Received: August 9, 2013
[a] Measured in CDCl3. [b] Δδ = δ1 – δ19.
Published Online:
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
3