Lyashenko et al.
based ligand makes it an interesting candidate for the
development of model complexes for metalloenzymes where
the metal is coordinated by histidine of porphyrin ligands.
In recent years, our research has focused on model
chemistry for a class of enzymes that catalyze oxygen atom
transfer (OAT) from or to a substrate commonly referred as
oxotransferases.11,12 They consist of a mononuclear high
oxidation state molybdenum atom that is coordinated by at
least one oxygen atom and one or two molybdopterin ligands,
the latter being a dithiolene system.13,14 To influence steric
and redox properties of the OAT reaction, model chemistry
has focused on the [MoO2]2+ core and on the variation of
co-ligands that are S,S-, N,S-, and N,O-based.12,15,16 Far less
investigated are N,N-based molybdenum dioxo compounds
that are catalysts in OAT reactions.11,17 Recently, we reported
unusual complexes employing η2-pyrazolate ligands that lead
to trigonal prismatic molybdenum dioxo complexes capable
of catalyzing the oxygen atom transfer from dimethyl
sulfoxide to triphenylphosphine.11 The hard nitrogen atoms
contrast the soft ligation in the natural enzymes leading to
systems with unique properties.
For this reason, we got attracted by the idea of coordinating
the widely used nitrogen-based â-diketiminate ligands to the
molybdenum dioxo core. To our surprise, a literature search
did not reveal any molybdenum(VI) oxo complexes with the
â-diketiminate ligands. A few related examples are known
that contain 1,4,8,11-tetraaza(14)annulene type ligands con-
sisting of a â-diketiminate unit.18,19 In addition, the literature
search revealed not only the absence of oxo compounds but
also the scarcity of any high oxidation state molybdenum
compound with these types of ligands. Only very recently,
imido alkylidene complexes containing â-diketiminate ligands
were reported by Schrock and co-workers.20
Experimental Section
General Methods. All manipulations were carried out under dry
nitrogen or argon using standard Schlenk line or glovebox
techniques. All solvents were purified by standard methods and
distilled over sodium/benzophenone under argon atmosphere im-
mediately prior to use. NacNacH,1 NacNacK,21 KPz,22 [MoO2Cl2],23
[MoO2(η2-Pz)2],11b [Mo(NAr)2Cl2(dme)] (dme ) dimethoxy-
ethane),24 and [Mo(N-t-Bu)2Cl2(dme)]24 were prepared according
to literature procedures. All other chemicals mentioned were used
as purchased from commercial sources (Aldrich, Merck).
Samples for mass spectrometry were measured on a BIO-RAD
Digilab FTS-7 mass spectrometer with a Finnigan MAT 95 and all
NMR spectra on a Bruker Avance 200, 360, or 500 MHz. Spectra
were obtained at 25 °C unless otherwise noted. Elemental analyses
were performed by the Analytisches-Chemisches Laboratorium des
Instituts fu¨r Anorganische Chemie der Technischen Universita¨t
Graz, Austria. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR
Spectrometer 1725X as Nujol mull between KBr plates.
[{MoO2(NacNac)}2] (1). Freshly sublimed [MoO2(η2-Pz)2] (0.50
g, 1.02 mmol) and NacNacH (0.61 g, 1.99 mmol) were dissolved
in toluene (30 mL) and stirred for 12 h at 55 °C. After cooling to
room temperature, a significant amount of black-green solid was
filtered off. The brown-orange filtrate was evaporated in vacuo,
and the resulting solid was thoroughly rinsed with pentane affording
the dimer 1 as a brown powder. Yield: 0.22 g (25% based on Mo).
Crystals suitable of X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by
1
cooling a toluene solution to +5 °C. H NMR (360 MHz, C6D6):
δ 1.37 (s, 6H, N-C(CH3)), 1.47 (s, 6H, CH3-Ar), 2.30 (s, 6H, CH3-
Ar), 5.29 (s, 1H, γ-H), 6.80-6.99 (m, 6H, H-Ar). 13C{1H} NMR
(360 MHz, C6D6): δ 18.1, 18.5, 24.8, 103.3, 125.2, 129.2, 130.4,
133.1, 150.6, 167.4. MS (EI): m/z 867 (100%) ([{MoO2-
(NacNac)}2]+). IR (KBr): 959 (vs), 762 (vs) cm-1. Anal. Calcd
for C42H50N4O4Mo2: C, 58.20; H, 5.81; N, 6.46. Found: C, 57.91;
H, 5.77; N, 6.45.
[MoO2(NacNac)(η2-Pz)] (2). Crystals suitable for X-ray dif-
fraction analysis were obtained by the following procedure: a
solution of NacNacH (0.016 g, 0.052 mmol) in C6D6 (2 mL) was
added to a vigorously stirred solution of freshly sublimed [MoO2-
(η2-Pz)2] (0.025 g, 0.051 mmol) in C6D6 (2 mL) giving a clear
In this paper we describe the introduction of the NacNac
ligand to the [MoO2]2+ core by using [MoO2(η2-Pz)2] as a
precursor where the η2-Pz ligand serves as the leaving group.
In comparison, the non-oxidizing cores [Mo(NAr)2]2+ (Ar
) 2,6-Me2C6H3) and [Mo(N-t-Bu)2]2+ allowed the coordina-
tion of the NacNac ligand by conventional metal-chloride
metathesis. Syntheses, spectroscopic data, and the crystal-
lographic characterization of new oxo and imido compounds
are reported.
1
orange solution. A H NMR spectrum which was recorded after
20 min of ligand addition shows resonances for compound 2 and
[MoO2(η2-Pz)2] in the ratio 1:1, together with those for ap-
proximately 5 equiv of PzH. Storing the solution at room temper-
ature for a few days led to the formation of a dark-green precipitate
together with several yellow crystals. These crystals were picked
for the crystal structure determination. 1H NMR of the aliquot taken
after 20 min reaction time (200 MHz, C6D6) of 2: δ 1.10 (br s, 18
H, 2C(CH3)3), 1.50 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.20 (s, 12H, 4CH3), 5.20 (s,
1H, γ-H), 6.14 (s, 1H, γ-H), 6.90-7.20 (m, 6H, H-Ar).
[Mo(NAr)2Cl(NacNac)] (3). To [Mo(NAr)2Cl2(dme)] (0.49 g,
0.99 mmol) and NacNacK (0.34 g, 0.98 mmol) was added diethyl
ether (30 mL). The mixture was stirred under reflux for 12 h
affording a dark cherry-red suspension, which was cooled to room
temperature and filtered over a pad of Celite. The filtrate was
concentrated to half and left at -20 °C overnight. Orange crystals
were collected on a frit, thoroughly rinsed with pentane and dried
in vacuo, giving 3 as an orange powder. Yield: 0.51 g (75%).
(11) (a) Most, K.; Ko¨pke, S.; Dall’Antonia, F.; Mo¨sch-Zanetti, N. C. Chem.
Commun. (Cambridge) 2002, 1676-1677. (b) Most, K.; Hossbach,
J.; Vidovic, D.; Magull, J.; Mo¨sch-Zanetti, N. C. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2005, 347, 463-472.
(12) Lyashenko, G.; Saischek, G.; Pal, A.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Mo¨sch-Zanetti,
N. C. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge) 2007, 701-703.
(13) Hille, R. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 2757-2816.
(14) Enemark, J. H.; Cooney, J. J. A.; Wang, J.-J.; Holm, R. H. Chem.
ReV. 2004, 104, 1175-1200.
(15) Enemark, J. H.; Cooney, J. J. A.; Wang, J.-J.; Holm, R. H. Chem.
ReV. 2004, 104, 1175-1200.
(16) Thapper, A.; Lorber, C.; Fryxelius, J.; Behrens, A.; Nordlander, E. J.
Inorg. Biochem. 2000, 79, 67-74.
(17) Heinze, K.; Fischer, A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 1020-1026.
(18) Giraudon, J.-M.; Sala-Pala, J.; Guerchais, J.-E.; Toupet, L. Inorg.
Chem. 1991, 30, 891-899.
(21) Fekl, U.; Kaminsky, W.; Goldberg, K. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 15286-15287.
(22) Ye´lamos, C.; Heeg, M. J.; Winter, C. H. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 3892-
3894.
(23) Gibson, V. C.; Kee, T. P.; Shaw A. Polyhedron 1990, 9, 2293-2298.
(24) Fox, H.; Cai J.; Schrock, R. R. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 2287-2289.
(19) Lee, S.; Floriani, C.; Chiesi-Villa, A.; Guastini, C. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1989, 145-149.
(20) Tonzetich, Z. J.; Jiang, A. J.; Schrock, R. R.; Mu¨ller, P. Organome-
tallics 2006, 25, 4725-4727. Tonzetich, Z. J.; Jiang, A. J.; Schrock,
R. R.; Mu¨ller, P. Organometallics 2007, 26, 3771-3783.
114 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2008