Communications
achieved as follows (Scheme 2): The optically active ketone
coupled with (trimethylsilylmethyl)magnesium chloride in
the presence of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium to
afford allyl silane derivative 18.Deprotection of the benzoyl
group of 18 using 3n NaOH gave the alcohol 19, which upon
oxidation with tetrapropylammonium perruthenate (TPAP)
afforded the desired aldehyde 20.[12]
11[9] was converted into silyl enol ether 12, which upon
reduction with lithium aluminum hydride afforded alcohol 13.
After protection of the hydroxy group of 13, the resulting
At this stage a study was carried out to determine the best
conditions for construction of the bicyclic system by using
either the Sakurai reaction or an intramolecular carbonyl–ene
reaction.Although difficulties were initially encountered with
the conversion of 20 into 21 (for example, attempted
cyclization with a Lewis acid such as zinc chloride, boron
trifluoride etherate, or tin(IV) chloride gave the desired
compound in only moderate yields), treatment of 20 with
0.2 mol% of para-toluenesulfonic acid (pTsOH) in refluxing
chloroform afforded the cyclization products 21, 22, and 23 in
85% yield in a ratio of 28:67:5 (Table 1).This result clearly
indicated that the cyclization would proceed through an
intramolecular carbonyl–ene reaction.When the reaction was
carried out with 10 mol% of pTsOH in refluxing chloroform
for 15 minutes, the desired compound 21 was isolated stereo-
selectivly in 96% yield (Table 1).[13] In this conversion, the
stereochemistry of the secondary hydroxy group of 21 was
again controlled by the presence of a vinyl group.The
stereochemistry of the product was unambiguously deter-
mined on the basis of 2D NMR spectroscopy and NOE
experiments.
It should also be noted that the presence of a trimethylsilyl
group seemed to be essential for the carbonyl–ene reaction.
Our preliminary experiment showed that a structurally
related model compound without a trimethylsilyl group did
not give any desired compound under similar reaction
conditions.
The stereochemistry of the hydroxy group of 21 was
inverted in two steps by oxidation with TPAP and subsequent
reduction of the resulting ketone 24 with sodium borohydride
reduction to give 25 (Scheme 3).
Scheme 2. Preparation of the key aldehyde (20). Bz=benzoyl,
DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide, DMSO=dimethyl sulfoxide,
M.S.=molecular sieves, NMO=4-methylmorpholine N-oxide.
benzoate 14 was subjected to the improved Ito–Saegusa
oxidation[10] to give enone 15.Avinyl group was introduced at
the b-position of the enone moiety as a synthetic equivalent to
the carbonyl function because previous studies had shown
that an attempted preparation of allyl silane derivatives
bearing a cyano group or oxo function at this position did not
give the desired compounds.[11]
Accordingly, enone 15 was treated with vinylmagnesium
bromide in THF at À788C in the presence of copper(I)
cyanide to afford ketone 16 as an inseparable mixture of
diastereoisomers in a ratio of about 5:1 (98% yield).
Although the stereochemistry of the vinyl group could not
be determined at this stage, it was assumed that the major
product had an S configuration arising from an axial attack of
the vinyl group on enone 15.Significantly, the stereoselectiv-
ity of the conjugate addition of the vinyl group to 15 was
influenced by the presence of a methyl group on the side
chain.When a similar addition was carried out for the
compound without a methyl group on its side chain, the ratio
of products was found to be approximately 1:1.Ketone 16 was
treated with N-phenyltriflimide and sodium hexamethyl-
disilazide (NaHDMS), and the resulting triflate 17 was
Finally, the improved Lemieux–Johnson oxidation of 25
gave lactol 26.[14] In the oxidation, a site-selective di-
hydroxylation of the carbon–carbon double bond was
observed.Further oxidation of 26 with Fetizon reagent
provided the known lactone 27.The specific optical rotation
of 27 was identical to that reported in the literature[2]
(although its spectroscopic data were not mentioned).To
complete the total synthesis of the target compound 1, lactone
Table 1: Intramolecular carbonyl–ene reaction of aldehyde 20 with
pTsOH.
pTsOH [mol%]
t [h]
Total yield [%]
Ratio (21:22:23)
0.2
0.5
10
0.5
1.0
0.25
85
74
96
28:67:5
41:55:4
100[a]:0:0
[a] exo:endo ratio (96:4) was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
132
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 131 –133