Thiyl Radical-Mediated Racemization of Aliphatic Amines
Other parameters might be taken into account such as amine
basicity17,18 or amine ionization potential.13,19 Since all properties
are intimately correlated, it is difficult to define which parameter
best accounts for the results.
The rate of formation of disulfide in the reaction medium
seems to be the most critical factor. The higher the amount of
disulfide is, the lower the amount of free thiol, i.e., the lower
the amount of hydrogen atom donor in the medium is. Even
though the homolytic cleavage of either the thiol or the disulfide
may initiate the production of thiyl radical, the reaction cannot
proceed unless the concentration of hydrogen donor enables
hydrogen atom transfer to the intermediate R-aminoalkyl radical
to become more efficient than competitive side reactions.
As the reaction proceeds, an increasing amount of disulfide
is formed at the expense of the thiol. Even spontaneous
formation of a small amount of disulfide was observed upon
mixing the reagents together at t0 just before starting irradiation.
The formation of disulfide can occur through different path-
ways.20 Equations 1-8 illustrate a panel of elementary steps
the occurrence of which may be envisaged in the reaction
medium. Thiyl radical and disulfide radical anions are closely
related to each other through an equilibrium which comes into
play any time thiyl radicals are generated through a redox
process from either thiols or disulfides (eq 3). Due to the
involvement of thiolate anion the equilibrium depends on the
concentration of the anion and thus, in our case, on the pKa of
the amine and on its concentration. It depends also on the nature
of the R group and, thus, on the acidity of the thiol. Reductive
generation of thiyl radical through direct electron transfer to
disulfide can be initiated with one electron reducing species
such as R-aminoalkyl radicals (eq 7). Although less likely, direct
reduction of thiyl radical to thiolate anion can also be envisaged
with these alkyl radicals known as being powerful reducing
agents13,15,21 (eq 8).
FIGURE 4. Plots for the disappearance of methyl thioglycolate and
for the formation of the corresponding disulfide upon irradiation in
the presence of amines at 30 °C.
anism in eqs 5 and 6. However, the ionization potential of the
amine does not correlate with the rate of formation of the
disulfide. The formation of disulfide is slower in the presence
of primary amine 1 than in the presence of a tertiary one (N-
methyl-N,N-di-n-octylamine), but the formation of the disulfide
and the concomitant disappearance of the thiol go slightly slower
in the presence of a secondary amine (i-Pr2NH taken as model)
than with amine 1.
(17) pKa values in water are 10.69 for n-propylamine, 11.09 for
diethylamine, and 11.09 for triethylamine; see: (a) Lu, G.; Grossman, J.
E.; Lambert, J. B. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1769-1776. The corresponding
pKa values in acetonitrile are 18.4 for ethylamine, 18.8 for diethylamine,
and 18.5 for triethylamine; see: (b) Li, J.-N.; Fu, Y.; Liu, L. Guo, Q.-X.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 11801-11813. Solvent effect on amine basicity is
well known. A subtle differentiation, according to the nature of the alkyl
substituent, might be induced by a solvent of low dielectric constant like
benzene. See: (c) Headley, A. D. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 3688-3691. (d)
Safi, B.; Choho, K.; Geerlings, P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 300, 85-92. (e)
Caskey, D. C.; Damrauer, R.; McGoff, D. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5098-
5105.
(18) Proton transfer would induce the formation of an unreactive salt in
the reaction medium (the R C-H BDE is strengthened when the amine lone
pair is protonated). The formation of the ammonium thiolate is an
equilibrium. The more basic the amine is and the more acidic the thiol is,
the more the equilibrium should be displaced to the right and, as a
consequence, the least efficient the hydrogen abstraction should be. The
pKa value for methyl thioglycolate is 7.8, and the pKa value for n-BuSH is
10.9; see: McMillen, D. F.; Golden, D. M. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1982,
33, 493-532.
(19) For other photoinduced electron transfer processes involving amines,
see: (a) Pischel, U.; Nau, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9727-
9737. (b) Pishel, U.; Nau, W. M. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000, 13, 640-647.
(c) Dossot, M.; Allonas, X.; Jacques, P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4,
2989-2993.
(20) For general reviews, see: (a) Asmus, K.-D.; Bonifacˇic´, M. In
S-Centered Radicals; Alfassi, Z. B., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, 1999; Chapter
5. (b) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Guerra, M. Thiyl radicals. In Chemistry of Sulphur-
Containing Functional Groups; Patai, S.; Rappoport, Z., Eds.; Wiley:
Chichester, New York, 1993; pp 363-94. (c) For EPR studies of
photoreaction of aliphatic thiols leading to disulfide radical anions, see:
Cremonini, M. A.; Lunazzi, L. Placicci, G. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3805-
3810.
The evolution of the amounts of thiol and that of the corre-
sponding disulfide was investigated under different experimental
conditions monitoring the reaction by H NMR using penta-
1
methylbenzene as internal standard in C6D6.22 When methyl thio-
glycolate was irradiated alone for 3 h, less than 10% of thiol
was consumed to give the disulfide. When the thiol and MeN-
(n-Oct)2 (taken as a model for tertiary amine) were mixed in
the absence of irradiation, less than 6% of thiol was consumed
and converted into disulfide within 3 h. Figure 4 illustrates how
the irradiation of the thiol in the presence of the different types
of amines stimulates the formation of disulfide.
(21) (a) Wayner, D. D. M.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Griller, D. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1986, 131, 189-191. (b) For the theoretical prediction of the absolute
standard redox potentials of a series of R-amino radicals, see ref 13. The
values calculated in solution in acetonitrile, at the B3LYP/6-311++G-
(2df,2p)//B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory using the PCM solvation model,
There is a clear relationship between the nature of the amine
and the rate of formation of the disulfide which argues in favor
of the hypothesis of a photostimulated electron-transfer mech-
•
range from - 1.5 V to 0.36 V (E° ) -0. 66 V for H2NCH2 ; - 1.47 V for
•
(Me)2NCH2 ). (c) Armstrong, D. A.; Rauk, A.; Yu, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 666-673.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2008 367