highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) of 5 and
BnN were estimated to be ꢀ6.87 and ꢀ8.17 eV, respectively.
However, the calculated HOMO level of NADþ is not
expected to be in the nicotinamide core9 and the large energy
level difference (1.3 eV) is undesirable for electron transfer.10
Therefore, the D-type-PeT (electron transfer from the ex-
cited pyrene to nicotinamide species) mechanism seems
most plausible for quenching.
Further study on the binding between PyDPA and
NAD(P)þ was performed. In the case of NADþ, the
fluorescence spectral changes at 398 nm fitted well with a
one-to-one binding equilibrium, and its binding constant
(Ka) was estimated to be 4.4 ꢁ 104 Mꢀ1, which is similar to
the binding affinity toward monohydrogen phosphate.11
NADPþ showed more efficient quenching of the emission
of monomeric pyrene than did NADþ, and it does not
follow a one-to-one binding equilibrium. Interestingly, the
emission changes of PyDPA when a 2-fold concentration
of NADPþ (R2 = 0.983) is used indicates that PyDPA
interacts withNADPþ witha 2:1 binding stoichiometry via
coordination with diphosphate and phosphate moieties;
the two corresponding binding constants were assumed to
be very similar. Job’s plot analysis also supports a 2:1
binding stoichiometry. The apparent Ka of NADPþ was
estimated tobe 3.7ꢁ 105 Mꢀ1, whichis about 8timeslarger
than that of NADþ. One intriguing observation is that the
pyrene dimer formed in the 2:1 complex was not destroyed
upon addition of even large amounts of NADPþ during
the titration experiment. This is completely different from
the binding of PyDPA to ppGpp, in which the excimer
emission decreased at a high level of ppGpp.7,12 This
saturation behavior and ratiometric property toward
NADPþ would be advantageous in the selective sensing
of NADPþ, while ppGpp shows concentration-dependent
pyrene excimer emission, showing the highest excimer
emission at optimal guest concentration. The fact that
PyDPA-NADPþ complexation exhibits an increased Ka
compared to that of PyDPA binding with NADþ and
maintains the pyrene dimeric structure even at high con-
centrations of NADPþ can be understood in terms of the
cooperative effect of the aromatic groups involved in the
termolecular complexation.13
Figure 4. (a) Fluorescence spectral change upon addition of
FMN in the presence of 20 μM PyDPA. (b) Fluorescence
intensity change at 526 nm with time in the presence of 15 μM
FAD and either 1 μM (red circle) or 10 μM (black square) of
PyDPA. In both cases, experiments were performed in 1 mM
HEPES buffer solution (pH = 7.40), excitation = 344 nm.
enhanced, which may indicate that fluorescence resonance
energy transfer (FRET) between the two fluorophores
(pyrene and isoalloxazine) occurs (Figure 4a). However,
the normalized excitation spectra of FMN did not differ,
regardless of PyDPA presence, which implies that no
efficient FRET between PyDPA and FMN takes place
(Figure S8). Also, addition of pyrophosphate14 resulted in
a great enhancement in the emission intensity of both
PyDPA and FMN (Figure S9). These results suggest that
there is extensive mutual quenching between PyDPA and
FMN. Interestingly, however, we were able to detect green
fluorescence from isoalloxazine in a 1:1 mixture of PyDPA
and FMN under 365 nm UV light.
Next, we wondered if PyDPA can discriminate flavin
species by taking advantage of isoalloxazine’s fluores-
cence. A fluorescence titration experiment for FMN re-
vealed that the monomeric emission of PyDPA was greatly
decreased, while FMN emission centered at 526 nm was
The quenching mechanism of PyDPA by FMN (and
vice versa) was also studied by the electrochemical method.
Reduction potentials of both pyrene and FMN were
measured to be ꢀ3.52 eV, as shown in Table S1, indicating
that reversible electron transfer between the two LUMOs
of the fluorophores is possible. However, the estimated
HOMOs of pyrene and FMN are at ꢀ6.87 and ꢀ5.92 eV,
respectively, from the vacuum level. These data suggest
that efficient A-type PeT [electron transfer from the
(8) Schazmann, B.; Alhashimy, N.; Diamond, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 8607.
(9) The HOMO of the nicotinium core is estimated to be ꢀ8.17 eV.
The value is estimated from its reduction potential and optical band gap,
4.4 eV, corresponding to the absorption onset point, 280 nm.
(10) Siders, P.; Marcus, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 748.
(11) Han, M. S.; Kim, D. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3809.
(12) From the energetic point of view, these phenomena might
originate from the similar interaction strengths of bisZn(DPA)-phos-
phate and pyrene-pyrene in water. This would result in stabilization of
the equilibrium state. However, in the ppGpp case, the binding strength
of bisZn(DPA)-pyrophosphate overwhelms that of pyrene-pyrene, and
thus, equilibrium would be shifted toward destroying the dimeric form
of pyrenes at high ppGpp concentration.
(14) Because pyrophosphate has a greater binding affinity toward the
1,3-bis(Zn-DPA) moiety than FMN, addition of pyrophosphate elim-
inates the weaker interaction between PyDPA and FMN.
(13) Kool, E. T. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1473.
1212
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 6, 2013