2858
M. Tamaki et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 2856–2859
Table 2
addition, the antibiotics 13–15 showed the strong activity against
Gram-negative bacteria. The antibiotic activities against Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosa NBRC 3080 of 13, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa NBRC
3080 and Escherichia coli NBRC 12734 of 15 are eight times higher
than that of parent GR, respectively. It is interesting to note that
the antibiotic potency against both Gram-positive and Gram-nega-
tive bacteria can increase and the hemolytic potency for mamma-
Antibiotic activity and HPLC retention times (RT) of GR and GR peptides 8–15.
No.
Peptides
MICa
C
(l
g/mL)
D
rtb (min)
A
B
E
F
GR
6.25
12.5
>100
100
>100
12.5
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
12.5
>100
100
>100
12.5
6.25
6.25
3.13
12.5
25
>100
100
>100
25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
25
>100
50
100
12.5
6.25
6.25
3.13
100
100
22.0
17.2
16.5
4.5
3.5
2.2
2.2
2.0
2.0
0
8
9
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
-Gln6,6 ]-GR
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
12.5
25
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
25
0
-Glu6,6 ]-GR
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
-Thr6,6 ]-GR
lian cell membrane can decrease when cationic
D
-amino acid
-Tyr6,6 of GR.
GR is an amphipathic peptide antibiotic with four hydropho-
0
0
-Ser6,6 ]-GR
0
residues are incorporated into positions of
D
-His6,6 ]-GR
0
-Lys6,6 ]-GR
1’
3’
bic side chains of Val1, and Leu3, residues on one side and
two cationic side chains cons of Orn2, 2’ residues on another side
of the antiparallel b-sheet structure.4e GR with two cationic side
chains is the strong antibacterial activity against Gram-positive
bacteria, but is very weakly active against Gram-negative bacte-
ria. On the other hand, polymixin B, which is an amphiliphic
structure with polycationic nature, is strongly active against
Gram-negative bacteria but is inactive or very weakly active
against Gram-positive bacteria.10 Polycationic antibiotics such
as polymyxin B are considered to bind to the outer membrane
of Gram-negative bacteria, leading to their disorganization and
permeabillization.11 In the present studies, we synthesized novel
GR peptides 13–15 with the strong activity against both Gram-
0
-Orn6,6 ]-GR
0
25
12.5
-Arg6,6 ]-GR
12.5
a
MIC (Minimum Inhibitory concentration) was determined by microplate dilu-
tion method with 106 organisms per ml. The microorganisms employed in the
assays were Bacillus subtilis NBRC 3513 (A), Bacillus megaterium ATCC 19213 (B),
Staphylococcus epidemidis NBRC 12933 (C), Staphylococcus aureus NBRC 12732 (D),
Pseudomonas aeruginosa NBRC 3080 (E) and Escherichia coli NBRC 12734 (F).
b
TSK-Gel C18 column (4.6 ꢀ 250 mm, 10 mm particle size, Tosoh Co., Japan) was
used; flow rate, 1 ml/min; solvent, MeOH-0.1%TFAaq (65:35); monitoring wave-
length, 220 nm.
positive and Gram-negative bacteria, which have
D-amino acid
0
residues with cationic side chains in place of
D
-Tyr6,6 residues.
In addition, we found that the GR peptides 13–15 have differen-
tial ionic interaction against the prokaryotic membrane and
eukaryotic membrane. In other words, the dissociations of high
antimicrobial and low hemolytic activities are caused by the
additional positive charges of 13–15.
In conclusion, we have found a novel position on the scaffold of
0
GR at
D
-Tyr6,6 residues whose modification will significantly lower
the unwanted hemolytic activity and simultaneously enhance the
desired antibiotic activity. Our findings should be helpful in finding
drug candidates with high antimicrobial and low hemolytic activ-
ities that are capable of combating microbial resistance. Currently,
further synthetic studies of GR peptides with both strong antibiotic
and low hemolytic activities are carrying on.
Figure 3. Dose dependence curves of hemolysis (%) induced by GR and GR-peptides
(8–15).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, and TLC, HPLC,
MS and elemental analyses data for 1–15) associated with this arti-
References and notes
1. (a) Izumiya, N.; Kato, T.; Aoyagi, H.; Waki, M.; Kondo, M. Synthetic Aspects of
Biologically Active Cyclic Peptides: Gramicidin S and Tyrocidines; Wiley: New
York, 1979; (b) Waki, M.; Izumiya, N. In Biochemistry of Peptide Antibiotics,
Kleinkauf, H.; Dhren, H. Von., de Gruyter, Eds. Berlin, Fed Rep, Ger., 1990; pp
205–244.
2. (a) Kondejewsk, L.; Farmer, S. W.; Wiskart, D. S.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Hodges, R. S.
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1996, 47, 460; (b) Stren, A.; Gibbons, W. A.; Craig, L. C.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1968, 61, 734; c Hull, S. E; Karlson, R.; Woolfson, M.
M.; Dodson, E. J. Nature 1978, 275, 206.; (d) Katus, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Kirots, H.;
Fujita, Y.; Sato, K.; Nagai, U. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1987, 899, 159; (e) Kawai, M.;
Yamamura, H.; Tanaka, R.; Umemoto, H.; Ohmizo, C.; Higuchi, S.; Katitsu, T.
J. Peptide Res. 2005, 65, 98.
3. (a) Zhou, N.; Mascagni, P.; Gibbons, W. A.; Niccolai, N.; Rossi, C.; Wyssbrod, H.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1985, 581; (b) Kohli, R. M.; Walsh, C. T.; Burkar, M.
D. Nature 2002, 418, 658; (c) Qin, C.; Zhong, X.; Bu, X.; Ng, N. L. J.; Guo, Z. J. Med.
Chem. 2003, 46, 4830.
4. (a) Zharikova, G. G.; Myaskovskaya, S. P.; Silaev, A. B. Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Biol.
Pochvoved. 1972, 27, 110; (b) Myaskovskaya, S. P.; Zharikova, G. G.; Silaev, A. B.
Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Biol. Pochvoved. 1973, 28, 123; (c) Tamaki, M. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1982, 57, 3210; (d) Tamaki, M.; Takimoto, M.; Muramatsu, I. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1987, 60, 2101; (e) Watanabe, E.; Sakamoto, Y.; Kikuchi, S.; Tamaki, M. In
Peptide Science 2005; Wakamiya, T., Ed.; The Japanese Peptide Society: Osaka,
2006; pp 227–230.
Figure 4. Correlation between hemolysis (%)a of GR peptides (1–15) and their
retention time (min) in HPLC analysis.b aPercentage hemolysis of the peptides
(100 l
M) in 10% DMSO-buffer solution against human erythrocytes. bTSK-Gel C18
column (4.6 ꢀ 250 mm, 10 mm particle size, Tosoh Co., Japan) was used; flow rate,
1 ml/min; solvent, MeOH-0.1%TFAaq (65:35); monitoring wavelength, 220 nm.
imidazole side chains showed 1/2 activity of GR against Gram-po-
sitive bacteria and no activity toward Gram-negative bacteria. Sig-
nificant further increase in the activity is achieved when the
cationic amino acid residual
D
-Orn,
residues. [
GR (13–14) possessed the same activity as that of parent GR
D-Lys, and D-Arg is introduced
6,60
0
0
into positions of
D
-Tyr
D D
-Lys6,6 ]-,9 and [ -Orn6,6 ]-
0
against Gram-positive bacteria. Further, the activity of [D
-Arg6,6 ]-
GR (15) is two times higher than that of parent GR against Bacillus
megaterium ATCC 19213 and Staphylococcus aureus NBRC 12732. In