S. Muthusamy et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 359–362
361
Scheme 1.
References
1. (a) Corey, E. J.; Seebach, D. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31,
4097–4099. (b) Seebach, D. Synthesis 1969, 17–36. (c)
Groebel, B.-T.; Seebach, D. Synthesis 1977, 357–402. (d)
Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18,
239–258. (e) Bulman Page, P. C.; van Niel, M. B.;
Prodger, J. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 7643–7677.
2. (a) Loewenthal, H. J. E. In Protective Groups in Organic
Chemistry; McOmie, J. F. W., Ed.; Plenum Press: New
York, 1973; pp. 334. (b) Greene, T. W. Protective Groups
in Organic Synthesis; John Wiley: New York, 1981; pp.
129–133.
3. See e.g.: Pettit, G. R.; van Tamelen, E. E. Org. Reactions
1962, 12, 356.
4. Olah, G. A.; Narang, S. C.; Meidar, D.; Salem, G. F.
Synthesis 1981, 282–283.
5. Kumar, V.; Dev, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 1289–
1292.
6. Corey, E. J.; Shimoji, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24,
169–172.
7. Garlaschelli, L.; Vidari, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
5815–5816.
8. Kamitori, T.; Hojo, K.; Masuda, R.; Kimura, T.;
Yoshida, T. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1427–1431.
9. Perni, R. B. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 2383–2387.
10. Mandal, P. K.; Roy, S. C. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7823–
7828.
11. (a) Babu, G.; Perumal, P. T. Aldrichim. Acta 2000, 33,
16–22. (b) Loh, T. P.; Chua, G. L.; Vittal, J. J.; Wong,
M. W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 861–862.
12. Typical experimental procedure: To a freshly distilled
dichloromethane (dried over phosphorous pentoxide) so-
lution of the appropriate carbonyl compound (1 mmol)
and 1,2-ethanedithiol (1.1 mmol) was added anhydrous
indium(III) chloride (0.3 mmol) under an argon atmo-
sphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temper-
ature followed by TLC until the starting material
disappeared. The reaction mixture was quenched with a
brine solution and repeatedly extracted using diethyl
ether. The combined organic layer was dried over anhy-
drous MgSO4 and the solvent was removed under re-
duced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel
column chromatography to furnish the 1,3-dithiolanes in
good yields.
Scheme 2.
benzaldehyde
and
ethyl
3-(2-oxocyclohexane)-
propionate. Further, we studied thioacetalization of the
keto-aldehydes 1218 (Scheme 2) which also exhibited
splendid selectivity towards the formyl group. When
4-acetylbenzaldehyde
(12a)
reacted
with
1,2-
ethanedithiol under the usual conditions, only the alde-
hyde group reacted and afforded the corresponding
product 13a in 87% yield. Repetition of this reaction
with 12b furnished the dithiolane 13b in 89% yield.
There was no evidence that the ketonic carbonyl group
reacted to any measurable extent.
In summary, mild conditions coupled with an exceed-
ingly simple protocol for the protection of aldehydes or
ketones as dithiolanes using indium(III) chloride as a
catalyst is reported. Furthermore, the relatively slow
reaction rate of ketones allows for chemoselective pro-
tection of aldehydes in the presence of ketones, making
this is an important tool in synthetic organic chemistry.
The notable advantages of this method are its chemose-
lectivity and the requirement for minimum amounts of
catalyst.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by CSIR [Young Scientist
Scheme] and the Department of Science and Technol-
ogy, New Delhi. We thank Dr. P. K. Ghosh, Director
and R. V. Jasra, Head of the Division, for their encour-
agement of this work. S.A.B. and C.G. thank CSIR,
13. All new compounds gave satisfactory spectral data in
accordance to their proposed structures.
New Delhi, for a Fellowship.
.