Initial studies of the Wittig reaction of acetonide 1 with
PhCHdPPh3 provided the olefin 2 as an inseparable mixture
of E/Z-isomers. Complete E-selectivity was achieved using
Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons methodology (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Chiral Sulfinimines 5a-c
Best results (see Supporting Information) were obtained using
nBuLi as base, which afforded pure 2 in 52% yield. A
modified Swern oxidation7 of hydroxy acetonide 2 provided
aldehyde 3 in 85% yield. Ensuing epimerization of the
R-stereocenter with K2CO3 in methanol using an adaptation
of the literature method8 gave aldehyde 4 with the requisite
stereochemistry in 83% yield. Aldehyde 4 was then converted
into chiral sulfinimines 5a (50%), 5b (74%), and 5c (69%)
by reaction with (R)-(-)-p-toluenesulfinamide, (R)-(+)-tert-
butanesulfinamide, and (S)-(-)-tert-butanesulfinamide, re-
spectively, in the presence of Ti(OEt)4.9
In support of the planned two-carbon homologation, we
were encouraged by a recent report that the addition of
enolates of R-hydroxyacetates bearing a bulky O-protecting
group (Boc) to simple chiral sulfinimines proceeded in a
highly diastereoselective manner.10 This observation was
exploited in an illustrative synthesis of the taxol side chain
with a 2R,3S configuration. Thus, we examined this reported
procedure with a view to obtaining protected APTO frag-
ments 7 with a 2S,3R configuration by reaction of sulfin-
imines 5 with protected R-hydroxyacetates 6 (Table 1).
Initially, the products were obtained in disappointingly low
yields, but inversing the reagent addition order (addition of
sulfinimine to the enolate) provided a dramatic improvement.
tBu-sulfinimines 5b and 5c (entries 3, 4, 6) provided much
higher selectivities and better yields than p-tolylsulfinimine
Figure 1. Microsclerodermins C, D, and E, with the APTO and
AETD fragments highlighted in blue and red, respectively.
some synthetic approaches to building blocks for the
construction of microsclerodermins A and B have appeared.4
Herein, we present our synthetic efforts in this field,
providing a rapid and efficient construction of protected
APTO and AETD derivatives. The retrosynthetic analysis
for protected APTO, the first target, is outlined in Scheme
1. We envisaged construction of the R-hydroxy-â-amino acid
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis for Protected APTO
(5) For reviews on chiral sulfinimines, see: (a) Davis, F. A.; Zhou, P.;
Chen, B.-C. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1998, 27, 13. (b) Ellman, J. A.; Owens,
T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 984. (c) Zhou, P.; Chen,
B.-C.; Davis, F. A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8003. (d) Brinner, K.;
Ellman, J. A. In EnantioselectiVe Synthesis of â-Amino Acids, 2nd ed.;
Juaristi, E., Soloshonok, V. A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New Jersey, 2005;
Chapter 8.
(6) Barbat, J.; Gelas, J.; Horton, D. Carbohydr. Res. 1983, 116, 312.
(7) Hjelmgaard, T.; Søtofte, I.; Tanner, D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
5688.
structural feature by stereocontrolled two-carbon homolo-
gation of chiral sulfinimine A2 with anion A1.5 Sulfinimine
A2 should be accessible via a differentiated dialdehyde
synthon A3, for which a convenient precursor should be the
readily available 2-deoxy-D-ribose acetonide 1.6
(4) (a) Sasaki, S.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
3013. (b) Sasaki, S.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T. Synlett 1999, 453. (c) Sasaki,
S.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3187. (d) Shioiri,
T.; Sasaki, S.; Hamada, Y. ARKIVOC 2003, 103. (e) Chandrasekhar, S.;
Sultana, S. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7255.
(8) Servi, S. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5865.
(9) Davis, F. A.; Prasad, K. R.; Carroll, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
7802.
(10) Wang, Y.; He, Q.-F.; Wang, H.-W.; Zhou, X.; Huang, Z.-Y.; Qin,
Y. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1588.
842
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 5, 2008