C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3. Proposed Mechanism
Acknowledgment. This work is dedicated to Prof. Larry
Overman on the occasion of his 65th birthday. We thank Dr. John
Greaves (University of California, Irvine) for obtaining mass
spectral data and Dr. P. Bruce Deker (University of Vermont) for
assistance with NMR characterization. Financial support from the
University of Vermont, the Vermont Experimental Program to
Stimulate Competitive Research (Grant No. EPS0236976), and
Amgen is gratefully acknowledged. Acknowledgment is made to
the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research
Fund for partial support of this research.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectroscopic data for all new compounds. This material if available
limited solubility of indium triflate in CH2Cl2, tin tetrachloride was
chosen as the Lewis acid of choice for further studies. Reducing
the quantity of tin tetrachloride to 10 mol % promoted the
fragmentation reaction, but product yield was reduced. Changing
the solvent from CH2Cl2 to toluene had little effect on the reaction,
whereas DMF inhibited the reaction completely.
References
(1) For reviews concerning ring fragmentations, see: (a) Hendrickson, J. B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6748-6756. (b) Grob, C. A.; Schiess, P.
W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 1-106.
(2) For examples of ring fragmentations in natural product synthesis, see:
(a) Fehr, C.; Galindo, J.; Etter, O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1953-1957.
(b) Mander, L. N.; McLachlan, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
2400-2401. (c) Corey, E. J.; Mitra, R. B.; Uda, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1964, 86, 485-492.
(3) Corey, E. J.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 189-203.
(4) Shing, T. K. M. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 7, pp 703-717.
(5) Claus, R. E.; Schreiber, S. L. Organic Syntheses, CollectiVe Volume 7;
Wiley: 1990; pp 168-172.
(6) Lee, D. G.; Chen, T. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 7, pp 541-591.
(7) Grob, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 535-546.
(8) (a) Eschenmoser, A.; Felix, D.; Ohloff, G. HelV. Chim. Acta 1967, 50,
708. (b) Felix, D.; Shreiber, J.; Ohloff, G.; Eschenmoser, A. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1971, 54, 2896.
To test the generality of this ring fragmentation we prepared
several additional γ-silyloxy-â-hydroxy-R-diazoesters (Table 1); this
reaction appears to be quite general. Tin mediated fragmentation
of cyclohexanone derivative 4 provided ethyl 8-oxooct-2-ynoate
(5) in 94% yield while 1-tetralone derivative 6 and 1-indanone
derivative 8 provided the corresponding homologous aryl-substituted
ynoates 7 and 9 in 95% and 71% yield, respectively.15 The more
highly conjugated (Z)-ethyl 8-oxooct-4-en-2-ynoate (11) was formed
in 97% yield from cyclohexenone derivative 10.16 The easily
separable diastereomeric cycloheptanone derivatives 12 and 14 were
formed in a 1 to 2.8 ratio, and these fragmented to ethyl 9-oxonon-
2-ynoate (13) in 91% and 76% yield, respectively. Dehydroisoan-
drosterone derivative 15 fragmented to provide the desired ynoate
aldehyde 16 in 76% yield.17 This example is notable because the
steroid-derived product would not be straightforward to prepare
by other means. Finally, the 2-methyl-2-silyloxycyclohexanone
derivative 17 fragmented to the tethered ketone ynoate 18 in only
27% yield.18
Our current mechanistic hypothesis for this transformation is
based on Padwa et al.’s19 report that â-hydroxy-R-diazoesters react
with BF3‚OEt2 to provide vinyl diazonium species, and ultimately
vinyl cations, via elimination of the â-hydroxyl group. We
hypothesize that γ-silyloxy-â-hydroxy-R-diazoesters react similarly
with tin tetrachloride to provide vinyl diazonium 19 (Scheme 3) in
which the Câ-Cγ bond and the C-N bond are coplanar. As
molecular nitrogen leaves, lone pair donation from the γ-oxygen
atom would result in Câ-Cγ bond fragmentation to provide ynoate
20. Subsequent loss of the tert-butyldimethylsilyl group would
provide tethered aldehyde ynoate 5.
(9) (a) Tanabe, M.; Crowe, D. F.; Dehn, R. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 3943.
(b) Tanabe, M.; Crowe, D. F.; Dehn, R. L.; Detre, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1967, 3739.
(10) (a) Kamijo, S.; Dudley, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5028-5029.
(b) Jones, D. M.; Kamijo, S.; Dudley, G. B. Synlett 2006, 936-938. (c)
Kamijo, S.; Dudley, G. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5629-5632. (d)
Kamijo, S.; Dudley, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6499-6507.
(11) (a) Marino, J. P.; Joseph, P.; Nguyen, H. N. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
6291-6296. (b) Nicola, T.; Schwarzrock, D.; Keller, M.; Eberback, W.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 1771-1778. (c) Trost, B. M.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 12491-12509. (d) Johnson, T.; Cheshire, D. R.; Stocks,
M. J.; Thurston, V. T. Syn. Lett. 2001, 5, 646-648. (e) Inokuchi, T.;
Kawafuchi, H.; Sigeru, T. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4983-4985. (f) Jang,
H.-Y.; Hughes, F. W.; Gong, H.; Zhang, J.; Brodbelt, J. S.; Krische, M.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6174-6175. (g) Paterson, I.; Cowden,
C. J.; Woodrow, M. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6037-6040.
(12) The relative configuration of diol 4 was established through 2D NMR
analysis.
(13) (a) Schoellkopf, U.; Frasnelli, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed Engl. 1970, 9
(4), 301-302. (b) Ye, T.; Mckervey, M. A. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 1091-
1160.
(14) Pellicciari, R.; Natalini, B.; Fringuelli, R. Steroids 1987, 49, 433-441.
(15) Compounds 6 and 8 were obtained as 10:1 mixtures of diastereomers.
(16) Hydrogenation of compounds 10 and 4 over Pd/C provides identical
saturated products and confirms the cis-diol stereochemistry of 10.
(17) The relative stereochemistry of 15 was established through 2D NMR
analysis.
(18) Diazo 17 was isolated as an inseparable mixture of diastereomers.
(19) Pellicciari, R.; Natalini, B.; Sadeghpour, B. M.; Marinozzi, M.; Snyder,
J. P.; Williamson, B. L.; Kuethe, J. T.; Padwa, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 1-12.
The Lewis acid promoted fragmentation of γ-silyloxy-â-hydroxy-
R-diazoesters provides a simple and efficient way to prepare tethered
aldehyde ynoates with varying tether length. Further studies on the
scope and mechanism of this fragmentation and synthetic applica-
tions of the tethered aldehyde ynoate products are underway.
JA801004D
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 12, 2008 3767