2230
T. K. Chakraborty et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 2228–2231
In summary, the furan and pyrrole rings of the hetero-
O
aromatic c-amino acids 1 and 2 nucleated additional
hydrogen bonds stabilizing a well-defined b-hairpin struc-
ture in peptide 3. Further work on these conformationally
constrained peptidomimetic scaffolds is currently in
progress.
N
H
O
ppm
N
O
HN
HN
7
8
O
NH
O
O
NH
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank DST, New Delhi, for finan-
cial support (SR/S1/OC-01/2007) and CSIR, New Delhi,
for a research fellowship (M.U.K.).
9
10
NHBoc
O
NH
O
O
References and notes
6
5
4
ppm
OMe
1. For some recent representative examples, see: (a) Khakshoor, O.;
Demeler, B.; Nowick, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5558–5569;
(b) Nowick, J. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 3869–3885; (c) Tashiro,
S.; Kobayashi, M.; Fujita, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9280–
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram showing the NOEs (in solid arrows) and the
hydrogen bonds (in dashed lines) observed in the b-hairpin type structure
of 3; (b) ROESY expansion showing the key NOE cross-peaks.
`
9281; (d) Grison, C.; Coutrot, P.; Geneve, S.; Didierjean, C.;
Marraud, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10753–10764; (e) Kruppa,
moted a hairpin that is sustained over a new set of chains
from the hGly(1) residue towards the NH-Boc end up to
the hGly(6) towards the carboxyl end. The juxtaposition
of these two residues is confirmed by the presence of an
NOE between hGly(1)CaH–hGly(6)CbH (Fig. 1).
´
M.; Bonauer, C.; Michlova, V.; Ko¨nig, B. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
5305–5308; (f) Jeannotte, G.; Lubell, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 14334–14335; (g) Blomberg, D.; Hedenstro¨m, M.; Kreye, P.;
Sethson, I.; Brickmann, K.; Kihlberg, J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
3500–3508; (h) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Benito, A.; Miranda, J.
I.; Fratila, R. M.; Matute, C.; Domercq, M.; Gago, F.; Martin-
Santamaria, S.; Linden, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16243–
16260; (i) Lee, H. B.; Pattarawarapan, M.; Roy, S.; Burgess, K. Chem.
Commun. 2003, 1674–1675; (j) Karle, I.; Gopi, H. N.; Balaram, P.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5160–5164; (k) Souers, A. J.;
Ellman, J. A. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7431–7448; (l) Wang, W.; Xiong,
C.; Hruby, V. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3159–3161; (m) Cochran,
A. G.; Tong, R. T.; Starovasnik, M. A.; Park, E. J.; McDowell, R. S.;
Theaker, J. E.; Skelton, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 625–632;
(n) Qiu, W.; Gu, X.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Carducci, M. D.; Hruby, V.
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 145–148; (o) Smith, A. B., III; Wang,
W.; Sprengeler, P. A.; Hirschmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
11037–11038; (p) Fisk, J. D.; Powell, D. R.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5443–5447; (q) Madalengoitia, J. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4986–4987.
The intensities of the ROE cross-peaks were converted
into distances and used in restrained molecular dynamics
calculations.12 The 100 structures that were sampled during
the MD simulations were energy-minimized and 30 low
energy structures were aligned, which show a predomi-
nantly single conformation along the backbone. The fray-
ing out at the terminal residues is due to rapid molecular
motions, as expected. The energy-minimized structure of
one of these samples is shown in Figure 2. From the energy
minimized structures, the b-turn hydrogen bond between
˚
Paa(5)NH–Faa(2)CO is estimated to be ꢁ2.26 A. The
u, w dihedral angles measured for D-Pro and Gly are
ꢀ18, ꢀ97 and ꢀ82, 54°, respectively. The energy-
minimized structures show the possibility that the b-hairpin
is further stabilized by Paa(5)pyrroleNH–Faa(2)CO
2. For some recent representative examples, see: (a) Rai, R.; Raghot-
hama, S.; Balaram, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2675–2681; (b)
Fisk, J. D.; Schmitt, M. A.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 7148–7149; (c) Aemissegger, A.; Kra¨utler, V.; van Gunsteren, W.
F.; Hilvert, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2929–2936; (d) Phillips,
S. T.; Blasdel, L. K.; Bartlett, P. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1865–
1871; (e) Nowick, J. S.; Brower, J. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
876–877; (f) Gibbs, A. C.; Bjorndahl, T. C.; Hodges, R. S.; Wishart,
D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1203–1213; (g) Venkatraman, J.;
Shankaramma, S. C.; Balaram, P. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3131–
3152.
˚
˚
(ꢁ2.38 A), Paa(5)pyrroleNH–Faa(2)furan ‘O’ (ꢁ2.41 A)
˚
and Faa(2)NH-Paa(5)CO (ꢁ2.8 A) hydrogen bonds across
the chains, as shown in Figure 1.
3. Rai, R.; Vasudev, P. G.; Ananda, K.; Raghothama, S.; Shamala, N.;
Karle, I. L.; Balaram, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 5917–5926 and
references cited therein.
4. (a) Chakraborty, T. K.; Mohan, B. K.; Kumar, S. K.; Kunwar, A. C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 471–473; (b) Chakraborty, T. K.; Mohan,
B. K.; Kumar, S. K.; Kunwar, A. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
2589–2592.
5. (a) Raghothama, S. R.; Awasthi, S. K.; Balaram, P. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 137–143; (b) Stanger, H. E.; Gellman, S. H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4236–4237; (c) Haque, T. S.; Little, J. C.;
Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6975–6985.
Fig. 2. One of the energy-minimized structures of 3 obtained from the
MD simulations.
6. Marques, M. A.; Doss, R. M.; Urbach, A. R.; Dervan, P. B. Helv.
Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 4485–4517.