SAR Analysis of NoVel DeriVatiVes of Narciclasine
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2009, Vol. 52, No. 4 1113
1
(CH2Cl2/MeOH: 96:4 v/v). (iii) H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 8.54 (s,
form part of the legends to the figures. The rest of the information
is provided in the Supporting Information. The potential survival
gain obtained using narciclasine and its derivatives was evaluated
by means of survival curve analysis.9,10,29,31,39
In Vivo Determination of Narciclasine (1) and its Prodrug
(7k) Plasma Concentrations. The experimental protocols are
detailed in the Supporting Information.
Statistical Analyses. Statistical comparison of control and treated
groups was initially undertaken with the Kruskal-Wallis test (a
nonparametric one-way analysis of variance). Where this revealed
significant differences, the Dunn multiple comparison procedure
(2-sided test) was applied. However, this was adapted to the special
case of comparing treatment and control groups in which only (k
- 1) comparisons were undertaken among the k groups tested by
the Kruskal-Wallis test (instead of the possible k(k - 1)/2
comparisons considered in the general procedure). The levels of
statistical significance associated with the %T/C (test/control)
survival indices were determined by using Gehan’s generalized
Wilcoxon test. The correlation between numerical variables was
analyzed by means of the nonparametric Spearman correlation test.
All these statistical analyses were carried out using Statistica
(Statsoft, Tulsa, OK).
1H, NH), 7.90-7.41 (m, 20H, -OC-PhH), 7.09 (s, 1H, PhH), 6.59
(t, 3J3′-4′ ) 3J3′-2′ ) 9.6 Hz, 1H, HC-3′), 6.45 (d, 3J1′-2′ ) 3.3 Hz,
1H, HC-1′), 6.26 (m, 1H, )CH), 6.10 (s, 1H, O-CH-O), 6.03 (s,
3
3
1H, O-CH-O), 5.73 (t, J4′-3′ ) J4′-5′ ) 9.9 Hz, 1H, HC-4′),
5.65 (dd, 3J2′-3′ ) 10.2 Hz, 3J2′-1′ ) 3.9 Hz, 1H, HC-2′), 5.31-5.21
(m, 3H, HC-2, HC-3, HC-5′), 4.99 (m, 1H, HC-4), 4.45-4.38 (m,
3H, HC-4a, H2C-6′), 2.09 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.05 (s, 3H, CH3CO),
2.02 (s, 3H, CH3CO) and 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 169.98 (OdC-
O), 169.49 (OdC-O), 169.25 (OdC-O), 165.01-164.80 (4C,
OdC-O benzoate), 161.99 (C-6), 151.42 (C-9), 138.73 (C-10b),
137.33 (C-7), 134.89 (C-8), 133.83-133.34 (m, Ph benzoate),
132.00 (C-10a), 129.23-128.43 (Ph benzoate), 117.59 (C-1),
114.39 (C-6a), 102.44 (C-11), 100.35 (C-1′), 99.57 (C-10),
71.14-62.73 (8C, C-3, C-4, C-2, C-2′, C-3′, C-4′, C-5′, C-6′), 49.00
(C-4a), 20.89 (CH3CO), 20.51 (CH3CO), 20.42 (CH3CO). (iv) MS
(ESI): m/z 1034 (MNa+) 1012 (MH+), 579.
2,3,4-Trihydroxy-7-(3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-hydroxymethyl-tetrahy-
dro-pyran-2-yloxy)-3,4,4a,5-tetrahydro-2H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-j]phenan-
thridin-6-one (7k): Compound 5k (113 mg, 112 µmol) and K2CO3
(20 mg, 144 µmol) were added to MeOH (15 mL) containing two
drops of water and stirred at ambient temperature for 16 h. The
solvent was removed under vacuum and the residue purified by
column chromatography using (CH2Cl2/MeOH/H2O 70:30:5 v/v/
v) to give 7k as a white solid (44 mg): (i) Yield: 84%. (ii) TLC Rf:
0.62 (CH2Cl2/MeOH/H2O 70:30:5 v/v/v). (iii) RP-HPLC (C18):
system 3, Rt ) 10.28 min and purity, 98.3% and system 6, Rt )
Acknowledgment. This work was partially supported by
grants awarded by the “Re´gion de Bruxelles-Capitale” (Brussels,
Belgium) and by the Fonds Yvonne Boe¨l (Brussels, Belgium).
We greatly thank Jean-Franc¸ois Gaussin, Ste´phanie Thomas,
Gwenae¨l Dielie, Lise Wlodarczak, and Gentiane Simon for their
excellent technical assistance.
1
9.12 min and purity, 99.7%. (iv) H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.72 (s,
1H, NH), 7.13 (s, 1H, HC-10), 6.17 (m, 1H, dCH), 6.11 (s, 1H,
O-CH-O), 6.08 (s, 1H, O-CH-O), 5.47 (m, 1H, OH), 5.25 (d,
3J1′-2′ ) 3.6 Hz, 1H, HC-1′), 5.02 (m, 2H, OH), 4.41-3.10 (m,
14H, OH, CH2, HC-2′, HC-3′, HC-4′, HC-5′, HC-2, HC-3, HC-4,
HC-4a); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 163.36 (C-6), 151.42 (C-9),
141.36 (C-10b), 140.12 (C-7), 133.93 (C-8), 130.69 (C-10a), 124.25
(C-1), 114.33 (C-6a), 103.02, 102.24, 100.50 (C-1′, C-10, C-11),
74.03, 73.77, 72.34, 71.70, 69.05, 68.92, 68.80 (C-2′, C-3′, C-4′,
C-5′, C-3, C-4, C-2), 60.16 (CH2-O), 52.70 (C-4a). (v) MS (ESI)
m/z 492 (MNa+).
Supporting Information Available: The results of the analysis
of all compounds synthesized and evaluated in this study with the
exception of 1, 5k, and 7k (HPLC, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass
spectra). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Lefranc, F.; Brotchi, J.; Kiss, R. Possible future issues in the treatment
of glioblastomas: special emphasis on cell migration and the resistance
of migrating glioblastoma cells to apoptosis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005,
23, 2411–2422.
(2) Eberle, J.; Kurbanov, B. M.; Hossini, A. M.; Trefzer, U.; Fecker, L. F.
Overcoming apoptosis deficiency of melanomashope for new thera-
peutic approaches. Drug Resist. Updates 2007, 10, 218–234.
(3) Malthaner, R. A.; Collin, S.; Fenlon, D. PreoperatiVe Chemotherapy
for Resectable Thoracic Esophageal cancer. ReView, The Cochrane
Library; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2007; pp 1-34.
(4) Giovannetti, E.; Mey, V.; Nannizzi, S.; Pasqualetti, G.; Del Tacca,
M.; Danesi, R. Pharmacogenetics of anticancer drug sensitivity in
pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 1387–1395.
(5) Uzzo, R. G.; Haas, N. B.; Crispen, P. L.; Kolenko, V. M. Mechanisms
of apoptosis resistance and treatment strategies to overcome them in
hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer 2008, 112, 1660-1671.
(6) Shivapurkar, N.; Reddy, J.; Chaudhary, P. M.; Gazdar, A. F. Apoptosis
and lung cancer: a review. J. Cell Biochem. 2003, 88, 885–898.
(7) Lefranc, F.; Facchini, V.; Kiss, R. Proautophagic drugs: a novel means
to combat apoptosis-resistant cancers, with a special emphasis on
glioblastomas. Oncologist 2007, 12, 1395–1403.
(8) Lefranc, F.; James, S.; Camby, I.; Gaussin, J. F.; Darro, F.; Brotchi,
J.; Gabius, H. J.; Kiss, R. Combined cimetidine and temozolomide,
compared with temozolomide alone: significant increases in survival
in nude mice bearing U373 human glioblastoma multiforme orthotopic
xenografts. J. Neurosurg. 2005, 102, 706–714.
(9) Joseph, B.; Darro, F.; Behard, A.; Lesur, B.; Collignon, F.; Decae-
stecker, C.; Frydman, A.; Guillaumet, G.; Kiss, R. 3-Aryl-2-quinolone
derivatives: synthesis and characterization of in vitro and in vivo
antitumor effects with emphasis on a new therapeutical target
connected with cell migration. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2543–2555.
(10) Ingrassia, L.; Nshimyumukiza, P.; Dewelle, J.; Lefranc, F.; Wlodarc-
zak, L.; Thomas, S.; Dielie, G.; Chiron, C.; Zedde, C.; Tisne`s, P.; van
Soest, R.; Braeckman, J. C.; Darro, F.; Kiss, R. A lactosylated steroid
contributes in vivo therapeutic benefits in experimental models of
mouse lymphoma and human glioblastoma. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49,
1800–1807.
Pharmacology. In Vitro Pharmacology: Cell Lines. Human
cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA), the European Collection of Cell
Culture (ECACC, Salisbury, UK), and the Deutsche Sammlung von
Mikroorganismen and Zellkulturen (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Ger-
many). The code numbers and histological types of all the cell lines
used in the current study are detailed in Table 2. The GL-19 GBM
primoculture is part of a collection of several hundred GBM
primocultures established within the Department of Neurosurgery
of the Wagner Jauregg Hospital (Linz, Austria).
Biological, Biochemical and Molecular Biology Related
Experiments. The effects of narciclasine and its derivatives on:
(1) The overall growth level of human cancer cell lines was
determined using the colorimetric MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-
2yl]-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, Sigma, Belgium) assay.9,10,20,21
(2) Cell proliferation (mitosis) and cell migration were determined
by means of computer-assisted phase contrast microscopy.8-10,21,22
(3) The actin cytoskeleton organization was determined by means
of computer-assisted fluorescence microscopy.21 (4) Apoptosis and
necrosis were determined by means of flow cytometry as detailed
elsewhere.33
In Vivo Testing. All the in vivo experiments described in the
present study were performed on the basis of authorization no.
LA1230509 of the Animal Ethics Committee of the Belgian Federal
Department of Health, Nutritional Safety, and the Environment.
In Vivo Toxicology Study of Narciclasine (1) in Rats. The
study was performed according to ICH Harmonized Tripartite
Guidelines: Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human
Clinical Trials for Pharmaceuticals (16 July 1997) and undertaken
at Notox B.V. (s’-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands: Notox project
487389 and Unibioscreen reference no. 4818-2-5-001).
In Vivo Evaluation of Anti-Tumor Activity. The details of
each experiment are provided in the Discussion Section and also
(11) Koehn, F. E.; Carter, G. T. The evolving role of natural products in
drug discovery. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2005, 4, 206–220.