ChemComm
Communication
wild-type group IV strain, RN8242, was incubated in the presence of
different concentrations of free AIP-40 and polymers 5b and 5c. The
hemolytic activity was measured following the release of heme from
sheep red blood cells (RBCs). We verified that free AIP-40, as expected,
acts as activator at low concentrations (13 nM and beyond, Fig. SI-6,
ESI‡) and as inhibitor at high concentrations (>5 mM). However,
polymers 5b and 5c showed some inhibition at both low and high
concentrations, while polymers devoid of AIP-40 did not. The inhibi-
tory pattern of 5b and 5c was quite unexpected and is currently further
investigated. It should be noted that while the agr system attenuates
hemolytic activity of S. aureus, it is not the sole or even primary
regulator of hemolysis, and as such full inhibition is not expected
upon agr inhibition.
Scheme 3 Synthesis of polymers 6a and 6b.
This is the first description of a multivalent polymeric inhibitor
of QS in S. aureus, using its autoinducing peptide as the active
entitiy on two different types of polymers. This system may be a
launching pad for creating new types of inhibitors by using
agonists or antagonists as the recognition elements. In addition,
it could deepen our understanding of multimeric receptor–ligand
interactions in QS and aid in studying the importance of bacterial
QS receptor topology on bacterial cell surfaces.
This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation
(Grant 749/09, MMM) and by The Edmond J. Safra Center for
the Design and Engineering of Functional Biopolymers in the
Negev (MMM and NGL).
Fig. 2 Fluorimetric binding assay. S. aureus cells were incubated for 30 min at
37 1C in the presence of 0.5 mM polymer 6b, 0.5 mM polymer 6a, or 0.5 mM polymer
6a + 0.5 mM AIP-40. Cells were then washed with TRIS buffer and fluorescence of
both pellet and supernatant was measured (lexc 490 nm, lem 520 nm), and their
ratios are shown. ** and * denote statistically significant differences between 6b
and 6a (p o 0.02) and between 6a and 6a + AIP-40 (p o 0.05), respectively.
measured. As shown in Fig. 2, polymer 6a shows significantly higher
affinity to the cells compared to polymer 6b. Moreover, in a competi-
tion assay between polymer 6a and free AIP-40 fluorescence levels are
comparable to those with polymer 6b. This suggests that the multi-
valency effect described in Table 1 is very likely due to an increase in
the affinity of the multivalent ligands to the receptor. The competition
assay also indicates that the general affinity of polymer 6a to AgrC is
lower than that of AIP-40 (Fig. 2).
To detect and localize the polymers in live cells, bacteria (O.D.600-
0.5) were incubated for 15 min at 37 1C in the presence of polymers 6a
and 6b. Images were acquired immediately after 2 washes with TRIS
buffer. Polymer 6a (containing AIP-40) was found attached to the
bacteria (Fig. 3b). In contrast, none of the cells was labeled with
polymer 6b (Fig. 3d). Following these results, the inhibitory effects of
AIP-40 containing polymers 5b and 5c on QS activation and their effect
on hemolytic activity of S. aureus was probed.5 Accordingly, S. aureus
Notes and references
1 A. C. Fluit, C. L. Wielders, J. Verhoef and F. J. Schmitz, J. Clin.
Microbiol., 2001, 39, 3727.
2 W. C. Chan, B. J. Coyle and P. Williams, J. Med. Chem., 2004, 47, 4633.
3 G. Ji, R. Beavis and R. P. Novick, Science, 1997, 276, 2027–2030.
4 G. J. Lyon, P. Mayville, T. W. Muir and R. P. Novick, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A., 2000, 97, 13330.
5 E. Geisinger, E. A. George, T. W. Muir and R. P. Novick, J. Biol.
Chem., 2008, 283, 8930.
6 B. C. Gorske and H. E. Blackwell, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 1441.
7 D. J. Welsh and D. K. Smith, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 4795.
8 L. L. Kiessling, J. E. Gestwicki and L. E. Strong, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2006, 45, 2348.
9 A. L. Garner, J. Park, J. S. Zakhari, C. A. Lowery, A. K. Struss, D. Sawada,
G. F. Kaufmann and K. D. Janda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 15934.
10 M. J. Ludden, D. N. Reinhoudt and J. Huskens, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2006, 35, 1122.
11 H. D. Maynard, S. Y. Okada and R. H. Grubbs, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 1275.
12 R. Samudrala, X. Zhang, R. M. Wadkins and D. L. Mattern, Bioorg.
Med. Chem., 2007, 15, 186.
13 R. V. Weatherman, K. H. Mortell, M. Chervenak, L. L. Kiessling and
E. J. Toone, Biochemistry, 1996, 35, 3619.
14 C. W. Cairo, J. E. Gestwicki, M. Kanai and L. L. Kiessling, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 1615.
15 J. E. Gestwicki, C. W. Cairo, L. E. Strong, K. A. Oetjen and
L. L. Kiessling, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 14922.
16 S. Iyer, S. Rele, G. Grasa, S. Nolan and E. L. Chaikof, Chem. Commun.,
2003, 151.
17 A. Carrillo, M. J. Yanjarappa, K. V. Gujraty and R. S. Kane, J. Polym.
Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2006, 44, 928.
18 A. Leitgeb, J. Wappel and C. Slugovc, Polymer, 2010, 51, 2927.
19 M. E. Buck and D. M. Lynn, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2010, 2, 1421.
20 B. Sun, X. Liu, M. E. Buck and D. M. Lynn, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2016.
21 J. S. Kavanaugh, M. Thoendel and A. R. Horswill, Mol. Microbiol.,
2007, 65, 780.
22 G. J. Lyon, J. S. Wright, T. W. Muir and R. P. Novick, Biochemistry, 2002,
41, 10095.
23 M. M. Meijler, L. G. Hom, G. F. Kaufmann, K. M. McKenzie, C. Z. Sun, J. A.
Moss, M. Matsushita and K. D. Janda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 2106.
Fig. 3 Imaging of polymers 6a, b in living cells. S. aureus cultures were incubated in the
presence of 1 mM polymer 6a (a, b), or in the presence of 1 mM polymer 6b (c, d). Left
panels, bright field; right panels, rhodamine channel. The scale bar represents 10 mm.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 5177--5179 5179