Communications
Scheme 3. Concise total synthesis of (+)-WIN64821 ( 1), (ꢀ)-ditryptophenaline (2), and (ꢀ)-N1-(2-phenylethylene)ditryptophenaline (3):
a) LiHMDS, THF, PhSO2Cl, ꢀ788C, 71%. b) EDC·HCl, HOBt, Et3N , CHCl2, 238C, 94%. c) TFA, CH2Cl2, 0!238C, 3 h; then morpholine, CH2Cl2,
2
238C, 48 h, 80%. d) Br2, MeCN, 08C, 15 min, 86%. e) [CoCl(PPh3)3] (1.8 equiv), acetone, 238C, 30 min, 48%. f) SmI2 (6.0 equiv), NMP, tBuOH,
THF, 08C, 1 h, 75%. g) MeI, K2CO3, acetone, 238C, 3 days, 93%. h) [CoCl(PPh3)3] (1.8 equiv), acetone, 238C, 15 min, 52%. i) SmI2 (6.6 equiv),
NMP, tBuOH, THF, 08C, 35 min, 79%. j) BnCHO, MeCN, 708C, 8 h, 29% or BnCH(OMe)2, CSA, 238C, 81%; then H2O, C6D6, TFA, 238C, 48%.
Boc=tert-butyloxycarbonyl, LiHMDS=lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, EDC·HCl=1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride,
HOBt=1-hydroxybenzotriazole, TFA=trifluoroacetic acid. NMP=N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, Bn=benzyl, CSA=(ꢁ)-10-camphorsulfonic acid.
treatment with LiHMDS (3 equiv)[10] followed by benzene-
sulfonyl chloride (Scheme 3). Condensation of the tryptophan
derivative (ꢀ)-8 and l-phenylalanine methyl ester (9) pro-
vided the desired amide (ꢀ)-10. Dissolving (ꢀ)-10 in
dichloromethane and subsequent treatment with trifluoro-
acetic acid followed by morpholine resulted in precipitation
of the target diketopiperazine (ꢀ)-11 as a single diastereomer
and with greater than 99% ee.[11,12] Importantly, attempts to
directly N sulfonylate the cyclo-l-tryptophan-l-phenylala-
nine (6, E = H) were unsuccessful because of its sensitivity
toward base-promoted epimerization, which lead to a mixture
of diastereomers. The bromides endo-(+)-12 and exo-(ꢀ)-13,
which are the key precursors for (+)-WIN 64821 (1) and
(ꢀ)-ditryptophenaline (2), respectively, were prepared in a
combined yield of 86% by exposure of (ꢀ)-11 to bromine in
acetonitrile.[13] The diastereomeric bromides were easily
separated and were found to be amenable to storage on a
scale greater than 10 g.
The total synthesis of (+)-WIN 64821 was then completed
in two additional steps from the endo-bromide (+)-12
(Scheme 3). After extensive experimentation with various
reaction parameters and substrates,[14] a practical set of
reaction conditions was identified for the dimerization of
diketopiperazines of the general structure 5 (Scheme 2).
Under optimized reaction conditions, treatment of (+)-12
with tris(triphenylphosphine)cobalt chloride (14, 1.8 equiv)[15]
in acetone (0.1m with respect to (+)-12) at 238C provided
direct access to the N-sulfonylated dimer (ꢀ)-15 as a single
diastereomer in 43–48% yield. Importantly, this reductive
dimerization exclusively provided the required cis-5,5-fused
bicycle of the hexahydropyrroloindole substructure.[16] It
should be noted that the dimerization substrate endo-bromide
(+)-12, and to a lesser extent the diketopiperazines in the
exo series (for example 13, Scheme 3), as well as the
corresponding dimerization products were found to be
sensitive toward base-promoted epimerization and autoxida-
tive decomposition. Ultimately, reductive removal of the
N-benzenesulfonyl groups of (ꢀ)-15 under optimized reaction
conditions was achieved by using samarium diiodide
(6.0 equiv) in a mixture of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran,
N-methylpyrrolidinone, and tert-butanol to give the first
synthetic sample of the natural enantiomer (+)-WIN 64821
(1, [a]2D1 = + 230 (c = 0.15, MeOH)); lit.:[1b] [a]D = + 200 (c =
0.15, MeOH) in 75% yield.[11] Notably, these conditions did
ꢀ
not lead to significant reductive fragmentation of the C3 C3’
bond, nor the epimerization of the base-sensitive diketopi-
perazine substructure.
Similarly, the total synthesis of (ꢀ)-ditryptophenaline (2)
was completed in three steps from exo-bromide (ꢀ)-13
(Scheme 3). Treatment of (ꢀ)-13 with methyl iodide and
potassium carbonate gave the corresponding N14-Me exo-
bromide (ꢀ)-16 in 93% yield. Treatment of (ꢀ)-16 with the
cobalt(I) complex 14 in acetone at 238C afforded the dimer
(ꢀ)-17 as a single diastereomer in 47–52% yield. Reductive
removal of the benzenesulfonyl groups provided (ꢀ)-ditryp-
tophenaline (2, [a]2D1 = ꢀ292 (c = 0.97, CH2Cl2)); lit.:[1a] [a]2D4
=
ꢀ330 (c = 0.52, CH2Cl2) in 79% yield (Scheme 3).[11] Signifi-
cantly, the reaction conditions described here for the di-
merization event were directly applicable to gram-scale
synthesis (for example (+)-12!(ꢀ)-15, 43% yield on a 1-g
1486
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1485 –1487