Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 40, September 2002
Plant material
To determine the efficiency of the extraction procedure,
samples were spiked with a known amount of standard amino
acids (10 mg each) and carried through the extraction and
derivatization processes as previously described.
Ackee fruit was obtained locally from fruit trees on the Mona
campus of the University of the West Indies.
Sample preparation
Ackee fruit (100 g) was homogenized with 195 mL of 80%
ethanol and strained through 2 layers of cheesecloth. The
extract was then centrifuged at 2000 × g for 10 min in a bench
centrifuge. The supernatant (205 mL) was extracted twice with
200-mL portions of toluene to remove the residual fat. The
ethanol layer (200 mL) was removed and filtered through
Whatman No. 4 filter paper (Whatman International Ltd., Kent,
U.K.). Samples from ackee seeds were prepared similarly to
samples from the arilli with the exception that the seed coat
was removed before homogenization. Cooked fruit was pre-
pared by boiling 100 g of tissue in 230 mL of water for 30
min. The water, which also contained 0.4 g of NaCl, was
decanted and retained for analysis. The cooked fruit was
homogenized and extracted as previously described for other
samples.
Filtered extracts (200 mL) were reduced to 10 mL using a
rotary evaporator Model No. 506 (Buchler Instruments, Fort
Lee, NJ) and made acidic by adding 1 mL of 0.5N HCl. The mix-
ture (10 mL) was applied to Amberlite resin IR-45 (9 × 5 cm
column dimensions) and washed with water (100 mL) followed
by 0.4M ammonium acetate (100 mL) at pH 9.4. Thirty-five
fractions (5 mL each) were collected using an ISCO Model 328
fraction collector (ISCO, Lincoln, Nebraska). Each fraction
was assayed for amino acids using 0.4% ninhydrin solution. All
positive fractions were pooled (105 mL) and retained. The
column was then washed with 0.4M ammonium acetate (100
mL) at pH 12.7. Positive fractions were again pooled (60 mL)
and the combined-pooled fractions (165 mL) reduced to 20 mL
by rotary evaporation. Hyp-A was isolated from the seeds of the
ripe fruit as outlined in reference 7.
High-performance liquid chromatographic apparatus
Chromatographic analysis was performed using a Beckman
(System Gold-Nouveau) chromatographic system (Beckman,
Fullerton, CA) consisting of a solvent module (Model 126), a UV
detector (Model 168), and an autosampler (Model 508) fitted
with a 20-µL injection loop. The solvent system consisted of
two buffers. Buffer A was 0.05M ammonium acetate (pH 6.8)
and buffer B was 0.1M ammonium acetate in acetonitrile–
methanol–water (44:10:46, v/v/v) at pH 6.8. The flow rate
through the column was 1 mL/min, and 20 µL of the samples
were injected onto the column (Waters-Spherisorb ODS2,
5-µm film thickness, 250 × 4.6 mm). Amino acids were identi-
fied by UV detection at 254 nm. A gradient elution program was
employed for analysis. Stepwise elution was used beginning
with 100% A for 0.2 min and changing from 100–50% A in 35
min. Fifty percent A was changed to 25% A in 5 min, the
system was held at 25% A for another 5 min and finally
changed from 25% to 100% A in 10 min.
Quantitation and identification
The internal standard method was used to quantitate the
amino acids in the samples according to the formula below (9):
K = (Ai) (Wx) / (Ax) (Wi)
Eq. 1
where Wx is the weight of component x, K the relative response
factor for the particular amino acid, Ai the area under the peak
of the internal standard, Ax the area under the peak of compo-
nent x, and Wi the weight of the internal standard.
The relative retention time (the ratio of the retention time
of the standard amino acids to that of the internal standard)
(RRT) was used to identify the amino acids that were present in
the sample.
Derivatization of amino acids using PITC
A stock solution containing 2.5 µmol/mL of each standard
amino acid in 0.1N HCl was prepared. A partially purified hyp-A
sample (1 mL) of unknown concentration was also prepared to
be used for the quantitative identification of hyp-A. From each
preparation, 20 µL was pipetted into separate eppendorf tubes
and 10 µL of norleucine (10 µmol/mL) was added.
Results and Discussion
The amino acid derivatization process of the standard amino
acids and hypoglycin is a modification of the method of
González-Castro et al. (8). After ion-exchange chromatography
100 µL of the extract of the ripe and unripe fruit was pipetted
into separate eppendorf tubes and 10 µL of norleucine (10
µmol/mL) was added to each. The solutions were dried under
vacuum in a Savant (Farmingdale, NY) speed vacuum at 65°C.
To the residue, 60 µL of methanol–water–TEA (2:2:1, v/v) was
added, and the resulting solution was evaporated under
nitrogen. Sixty microliters of the derivatizing reagent, which
consisted of PITC in methanol–water–TEA (7:1:1, v/v/v), was
added and the tubes were left at room temperature (26°C) for
20 min. The solvents were evaporated under a stream of
nitrogen and 300 µL of 0.05M ammonium acetate was added to
the residue prior to analysis.
Figure 1 shows the chromatogram of the standard amino
acids and the internal standard (norleucine = peak 16).
Although there was some variation in the retention time of the
amino acids, the RRT of the amino acids showed little variation
(Tables I–III). The percent recovery of some standard amino
acids is shown in Table IV, and these data were typical of all the
samples analyzed (ripe fruit, unripe fruit, and cooked ripe
fruit). With an average %recovery of 80.34% and with the K for
each of the amino acids being unity, the efficiency of the extrac-
tion and derivatization procedures may be described as good.
Based on the assessment of the percent recovery, phenylala-
nine, valine, and isoleucine (which like hypoglycin contain
hydrophobic R-groups) gave %recoveries of 98.5%, 75%, and
63.1%, respectively. These amino acids and their representative
recoveries were used to estimate the %recovery of hyp-A
442