A. M. Brouwer et al.
tributable to the imide radical anion in a non-hydrogen-
bonded form does not necessarily mean that the molecules
exist in the succ-1 co-conformer. Cyclic voltammetry, UV/
Conclusion
Cꢀ
The amide I region in the IR spectra of 1 and 2 in solvents
of different polarity (CHCl3, CH2Cl2, ClCH2CH2Cl, PrCN,
and THF) was analyzed. In the major co-conformer of 1,
the macrocycle is situated at the succinamide station. Both 1
and 2 showbands due to the naphthalimide station, originat-
ing from symmetric and antisymmetric C=O stretching and
aromatic ring vibrations. All these modes are solvatochro-
mic and exhibit a red shift with increasing solvent acceptor
number. In the IR spectrum of 2, n(CO)succ bands of both
free and hydrogen-bonded C=O groups were observed. In
rotaxane 1, a major part of the succinamide C=O groups
was found to be hydrogen bonded to the NH groups of the
macrocycle. The shift with respect to the free n(CO)succ in 2
is large (47 cmꢀ1) because two bifurcated hydrogen bonds
can be formed with each carbonyl.[16]
Vis spectroelectrochemistry and transient absorption spec-
troscopy experiments with 1, reveal almost quantitative con-
Cꢀ
Cꢀ
Cꢀ
Cꢀ
version of succ-1 to ni-1 (ratio ni-1 /succ-1 >1500).[17]
Cꢀ
Assuming full conversion to ni-1 in the present IR experi-
ments, we can conclude that in this co-conformer not all the
C=O groups of the naphthalimide anion are involved in hy-
drogen bonding, and also that more than one type of hydro-
gen bond with different geometry and strength is present.
An additional indication for this is the fact that the ns(CO)ni
Cꢀ
band of ni-1 (1591 cmꢀ1) is broad, probably composed of
bands from C=O stretching of differently hydrogen bonded
C=O groups.
The switching is driven by the fact that hydrogen bonding
between a macrocycle and naphthalimide radical anion is
energetically favored over hydrogen bonding between the
macrocycle and succinamide station, that is, the hydrogen
The IR spectroelectrochemical experiments unambiguous-
ly showthat the macrocycle undergoes translational move-
ment from the succinamide to the one-electron-reduced
naphthalimide station. Upon reduction of thread 2, three
newbands of the radical anion appear in the spectrum,
while the bands from the neutral naphthalimide disappear.
In rotaxane 1, the same bands showup, but shifted to lower
frequencies. This red shift of the C=O stretching modes
(25 cmꢀ1) is a result of bond weakening caused by hydrogen
bonding with the NH groups of the macrocycle. The
n(CO)macro band also shows a shift to lower frequency
Cꢀ
bonds between macro-NH and ni -CO are stronger than be-
tween macro-NH and succ-CO. This is confirmed by the fact
that the n(CO)macro band exhibits a red shift of 9 cmꢀ1 in ni-
Cꢀ
1
compared to succ-1. The red shift is obviously caused by
Cꢀ
stronger hydrogen bonds in ni-1 compared to succ-1.
From the fact that hydrogen bonds in ni-1 are stronger
Cꢀ
than in succ-1, one would expect a larger hydrogen-bond-in-
duced red shift of the ns(CO)ni band relative to the n(CO)succ
band. However, the red shift of the n(CO)succ band of 1 in
THF is 47 cmꢀ1 (1680–1633 cmꢀ1), while the largest shift ob-
(9 cmꢀ1 in THF) because the amide N H groups are in-
ꢀ
Cꢀ
served in the spectrum of ni-1 is for the ns(CO)ni band
volved in hydrogen bonds (indirect effect). Also, after shut-
tling a band from the liberated succinamide station appears
in the spectrum.
(25 cmꢀ1). The observation that the ns(CO)ni band in the rad-
ical anion exhibits a smaller red shift than the n(CO)succ
band in the neutral molecule, means that the former is less
sensitive to hydrogen bonding, but the reason for this is not
obvious.
A remarkable observation is the shielding effect of the
Cꢀ
macrocycle. The succ-CO and ni -CO groups encapsulated
by the macrocycle are isolated from the solvent. The corre-
sponding n(CO) bands do not showany dependence on the
solvent polarity.
To understand in more detail the influence of the strength
of the H-bonding interactions on the equilibrium between
Cꢀ
Cꢀ
succ-1 and ni-1 , experiments with structurally modified
rotaxanes are in progress. In these newmolecular shuttles,
the naphthalimide station was replaced by other aromatic
imides. Due to the different size of the aromatic core, the
electron density on the carbonyl groups in the radical anion
will be different. An important result of the study with a
naphthalene bisimide system is that despite the smaller driv-
ing force than in the naphthalene monoimide system, shut-
tling still occurs to a large extent (>80%).[41] This supports
ExperimentalSection
Syntheses: Compounds 1 and 2 were prepared as described in previous
work.[17] The syntheses of compounds 3 and 4 are depicted in Scheme 4.
Compound 3 was synthesized from precursor 5 in 89% yield. Compound
5 was prepared by using a literature procedure.[17] Compound 4 was syn-
thesized in two steps from commercially available 2,2-diphenylethylamine
and succinic anhydride in 71% yield.
Cꢀ
Cꢀ
the idea that in 1 , the conversion to the ni-1 co-confor-
N-Butyl-2,5-di-tert-butylnaphthalimide (3): A solution of 5 (205 mg,
0.66 mmol) and N-butyl amine (481 mg, 6.6 mmol) in ethanol (25 mL)
was refluxed overnight and stirred at room temperature for 3 d. After
this time, the white precipitate was filtered off and washed with ethanol
and dried in air. Product 3 was obtained as a white powder. Yield:
215 mg (89%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d=8.64 (d, 2H; arom. H),
mer is close to quantitative. Therefore, the minor fraction of
Cꢀ
apparently free C=O groups in ni-1 , represented by the
bands at 1614 and 1563 cmꢀ1 (in THF), must represent a
Cꢀ
fraction of species in which not all ni -COꢁs are hydrogen
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
8.12 (d, 2H; arom. H), 4.20 (t, 2H; N CH2 C), 1.72 (quin., 2H; N
bonded to the macrocycle NH groups.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
CH2 CH2 CH2), 1.47 (m, 20H; tBu + CH2 CH2 CH3), 0.98 ppm (t,
ꢀ
3H; CH2 CH3); elemental analysis calcd (%) for C24H31NO2: C 78.86, H
8.55, N 3.83, O, 8.75; found: C 78.20, H 8.50, N 3.98, O 9.24.
N-(2,2-Diphenylethyl)succinamic acid (6): A mixture of 2,2-diphenyl-
AHCTREUNG
1944
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1935 – 1946