aspect of selectivity was not examined for CrCl2-promoted
reactions. However, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis-(4-chlorophe-
nyl)ethane 4 (DDT) (Scheme 1), with two aromatic rings at
the migration origin, gave the expected product 1-chloro-
2,2-bis-(4-chlorophenyl)ethene 5 in 81% yield. 2,2-Dichlo-
roethyl benzyl ether was found to be refractory under similar
reaction conditions, as observed by Falck et al.4a
A mechanism involving 1,2-H shift in the copper-carbenoid
intermediate 7 (Scheme 2) formed by successive abstraction
of two chlorine atoms by CuCl/bpy through a free or, more
preferably a copper-associated, radical 6 (vide infra) has been
proposed for the reaction. The intervention of a free or
copper-associated radical 6 was inferred by the fact that the
reaction of 1a was inhibited by excess of TEMPO (2 molar
equiv). Further, 2,2,2-trichloroethylcinnamyl ether 82c (Figure
1), the vinylogous analogue of 1a, and other trichloroethyl
The evidence for the involvement of a carbene, or more
preferably, the copper-carbenoid intermediate 7 (vide infra)
was obtained when the reaction of 1a was performed in the
presence of a protic quencher with a view to ascertain
whether this association is organometallic type or coordina-
tion through a heteroatom. Thus, the reaction of 1a in the
presence of 20 molar equiv of methanol yielded the dimethyl
acetal 12 (Scheme 2) as the major product, about 5 times of
the rearranged products 2a and 3a, along with small amounts
of the unreacted 1a and some other minor unidentified
products (Table 2, entry 1). The structure of the acetal 12
was confirmed by comparison with an authentic sample. It
did not arise from the rearranged products 2a and/or 3a
because the latter were found to be stable under the
conditions as well as toward the action of CuCl2/bpy or its
equimolar mixture with CuCl/bpy, even in a 1:1 v/v mixture
of DCE-MeOH. The reaction of 1a in i-PrOH DCE (1:1
v/v) (Scheme 2) yielded the corresponding acetal 13 (Table
2, entry 2). However, the reaction of 1a in the presence of
a lower amount (2 molar equiv) of methanol gave only 2a
and 3a (85:15) in 72% combined isolated yield. No acetal
could be detected. The formation of the acetals 12 and 13
from 1a indicated that 1,2-H shift in the ethers might be
takingplacethroughachlorocarbeneorcopper-chlorocarbenoid
intermediate which, in the presence of an alcohol, underwent
insertion into the O-H bond of the alcohol followed by
solvolysis of the R-chloro ether thus formed to give the
acetal.12 In contrast, only benzoyloxy shift occurred in the
case of the trichloroethyl benzoate 14 to give 15 (Figure 1)
even in a (1:1 v/v) mixture of DCE-MeOH (Table 2, entry
3). 2,2,2-Trichloroethylcinnamyl ether 8 also afforded only
the HATRC product 9 (Figure 1) on reaction with CuCl/
bpy in refluxing DCE-MeOH (1:1 v/v) (Table 2, entry 4);
no acetal was detected in the reaction mixture. The insertion
of free chlorocarbenes into O-H bond of methanol is known
to be a fast diffusion-controlled reaction.10,11 The fact that
this was not observed in the case of 2,2,2-trichloroethyl
benzoate 14 and 2,2,2-trichloroethylcinnamyl ether 8 sug-
gested that probably the acyloxy shift and HATRC involve
a nonorganometallic type copper-associated/free-radical in-
termediate as proposed earlier.1,2 The fact that no acetal was
detected in the reaction of 1a at lower concentration of
methanol (2 mol equiv) indicated that the 1,2-H shift was
also very fast probably due to the known powerful rate
accelerating effect of the bystander alkoxy group on the
1,2-H shifts in carbenes12 Consequently, intramolecular C-H
insertion in the case of 1c and 1d was not observed and
attempts to intercept the carbenenoid intermediate in the
reaction of 1a by cyclopropanation with excess of cyclo-
hexene or methyl acrylate failed (Table 2, entries 5 and 6).
Intra- or intermolecular cyclopropanation with alkenes was
complicated by a preceding radical reaction, such as
Figure 1. Structures of some relevant compounds.
allylic ethers2b have been shown to undergo HATRC under
similar conditions to give the tetrahydrofurans of the type
9. Therefore, it was tempting to believe that the products
arose by the anticipated radical 1,2-H shift. However, the
extreme rarity of 1,2-H shift in alkyl radicals in solution7
demanded more careful scrutiny. Thus, when the reaction
of 1a with Bu3SnH/AIBN in refluxing benzene was per-
formed with a view to generate a radical intermediate through
a proven and trusted method of free radical generation, no
rearrangement products 2a or 3a could be detected even
under the conditions favorable to 1,2-H shift (slow addition
of Bu3SnH to a solution of 1a at sufficiently high dilution).
Only the elimination product 10 (Figure 1) (at higher
concentration) and the reduction product 11 were formed.
In a competition experiment between CuCl/bpy and Bu3SnH,
the reaction of 1a with Bu3SnH/CuCl/bpy even under the
conditions more conducive to reduction (more concentrated
solution of 1awith all the other reactants taken together)
yielded the rearranged products 2a and 3a (79:21) in nearly
double the amount in moles of the reduction product 11.
These results indicated that either a radical intermediate was
not involved in the 1,2-H shift or it had a different reactivity
from the free radical generated in Bu3SnH reactions. Similar
results were obtained by us1 during the 1,2-acyloxy shift as
mentioned earlier, and it was thought that the difference in
the reactivity of the two types of radicals might be due to
some sort of association of the radical intermediate with
copper in the CuCl/bpy-promoted 1,2-acyloxy shift.1
(10) Griller, D.; Liu, M. T. H.; Scaiano, J. C. J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1982, 104, 5549–5551
.
(11) For a review, see: (a) Miller, D. J.; Moody, C. J. Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 10811–10843. For some other examples, see: (b) Jiang, N.; Wang, J.;
Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8511–8513. (c) Motschiedler,
K.; Gudmundsdottir, A.; Toscano, J. P.; Platz, M.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A.
(9) For reviews on CrCl2-promoted reductions, see: (a) Ho, T.-L.
Synthesis 1979, 1–20. (b) Hanson, J. R. Synthesis 19, 74, 1–8.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5139–5147
.
(12) Nickon, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 84–89
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008
2245