availability and atom efficiency: the triscyclopropylbismuth
reagent is not commercially available and not stable for
extended periods of storage, and two of the three cyclopropyl
groups on bismuth do not participate in the coupling reaction.
Therefore, we searched for a more facile method to
introduce cyclopropyl groups on nitrogen atoms of azoles
and amides. Transition-metal-catalyzed reactions between
organohalides and amines constitute the most common
strategy for N-alkylation and N-arylation.8,9 Accordingly, we
initially attempted the coupling reactions of indole with
cyclopropyl bromide using a palladium, nickel, or copper
catalyst. However, no desired coupling product was obtained,
and only the N-allylated product derived from cyclopropane
ring opening was observed, together with unreacted starting
material (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Conditions for the N-Cyclopropylation of Indole
entry
amine
x
additive
y
yielda (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13c
0
7
40
9
36
10
20
20
pyridine
pyridine
pyridine
pyridine
pyridine
pyridine
Et3N
lutidine
DMAP
DMAP
1.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3
4
5
6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
Scheme 1. Palladium-, Nickel-, or Copper-Catalyzed Reaction
of Indoles with Cyclopropyl Bromide
21
45 (43)b
NaHMDS
NaHMDS
1.0
1.0
65 (62)b
0
3
DMAP
3.0
a HPLC assay yield. b Isolated yield. c Trialkoxyborate 7 was employed
instead of cyclopropylboronic acid.
Because of this vulnerability of cyclopropyl bromide to
ring opening, we next turned our attention to the copper-
mediated oxidative coupling reaction, a well-established
reaction between arylmetals and amines. Thus far, arylmetals
such as aryllead triacetate,10 arylbismuth,6,11 aryltrimethoxy-
silanes,12 diaryl iodonium salts,13 arylstannanes,14 and aryl-
boronic acid15,16 have been reported to be efficient coupling
partners for N-arylation. In particular, the coupling reactions
with arylboronic acids have been studied extensively since
the initial work by Chan and Lam.15,16 We decided to focus
on N-cyclopropylation with cyclopropylboronic acid since
it is a commercially available reagent17 and began our study
with indole as a model substrate. The initial results are shown
in Table 1.
We were pleased to find that the desired coupling product
was obtained in 40% assay yield under standard reaction
conditions (entry 3) : Cu(OAc)2 (10 mol %), pyridine (3.0
equiv), dry air, and toluene at 95 °C. DMAP and pyridine
were found to be suitable amines (entries 3 and 8-10). The
effect of additives was explored, and it was found that
addition of an equimolar amount of NaHMDS improved the
yield (entries 10 and 11), while addition of a catalytic amount
(0.1 equiv) of amine ligands (entries 4-6) or addition of
decanoic acid16b,d (0.2 equiv) did not improve the yields. This
was plausibly due to the increased nucleophilicity of the
indole anion. The reaction without pyridine or DMAP did
not proceed at all (entries 1 and 12). Trialkoxyborate reagent
7 (see Table 1), which was recently developed by Miyaura’s
group as an efficient reagent for C-N bond formation as
well as for Suzuki-Miyaura couplings,18 did not work well
(entry 13). Molecular oxygen was of importance in this
reaction. When the reaction was conducted under a nitrogen
atmosphere, no coupling product was obtained.
(8) For reviews, see: Kienle, M.; Dubbaka, S. R.; Brade, K.; Knochel,
P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 4166-4176.
(9) (a) Ullmann, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 2382-2384. (b)
Goodbrand, H. B.; Hu, N.-X. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 670-674. (c) Lindley,
J. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1433-1456. (d) Kiyomori, A.; Marcoux, J.-F.;
Buchwald, S. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2657-2640.
(10) Elliott, G. I.; Konopelski, J. P. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3055-3057 and
references cited therein.
(11) Sorenson, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7747-7749 and references
cited therein.
(12) (a) Lam, P. Y. S.; Deudon, S.; Averill, K. M.; Li, R.; He, M. Y.;
DeShong, P.; Clark, C. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7600-7601. (b)
Song, R.-J.; Deng, C.-L.; Xie, Y.-X.; Li, J.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
7845-7848.
(13) Kang, S.-K.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, D. Synlett 2000, 1022-1024.
(14) Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C. G.; Saubern, S.; Adams, J.; Averill, K.
M.; Chan, D. M. T.; Combs, A. Synlett 2000, 674-676.
(15) (a) Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C. G.; Saubern, S.; Adams, J.; Winters,
M. P.; Chan, D. M. T.; Combs, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2941-
2944. (b) Chan, D. M. T.; Monaco, K. L.; Wang, R.-P.; Winters, M. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2933-2936.
With these optimized conditions in hand, the scope and
limitations of this reaction were examined (Table 2).
The reaction tolerated a variety of functional groups, such
as chloride (entries 5 and 8), ester (entries 6), ketone (entry
7), nitrile (entry 3), and nitro (entry 4) groups. Although the
reactions with electron-deficient substrates were not sufficient
(17) Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions of cyclopropylboronic acid and
aryl halides had already been reported. Wallace, D. J.; Chen, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 6987-6990.
(18) Yamamoto, Y.; Takizawa, M.; Yu, X.-Q.; Miyaura, N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 928-931.
(16) (a) Collman, J. P.; Zhong, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1233-1236. (b)
Antilla, J. C.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2077-2079. (c) Quach,
T. D.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4397-4400. (d) Txschucke, C. C.;
Murphy, J. M.; Hartwig, J. F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 761-764.
1654
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 8, 2008