should be advantageous to achieve a rigid cycloaddition
transition state. The assumption of a cooperative bifunctional
Lewis acid-Lewis base activation mechanism was initially
supported by the observation that Er(OTf)3 did not destroy
the nucleophilicity of pyridine in the model reaction pre-
sented in Table 1 (entry 1), while no reaction took place in
the absence of either nucleophile or Lewis acid.
Figure 1. Zwitterionic dienolates 1 as reactive dienes for enanti-
oselective HDA reactions.
to poor reactivity of the organocatalysts. A bifunctional
Lewis acid-Lewis base catalyst by which the reactivity of
both the dienolate and aldehyde could be controlled was
therefore required.9,10 The combination of Lewis acids and
Lewis bases successfully united in one catalytic system has
recently found numerous applications in asymmetric catalysis
due to synergistic activation of both the electrophilic and
nucleophilic substrates, often allowing high reaction rates
and excellent chirality transfer.11
Table 1. Development of the Title Reactiona
The present studies were based upon the hypothesis that
a Lewis acid such as a lanthanide salt, which offers an
exceptionally high number of coordination sites, would be
advantageous to bind both aldehyde and dienolate plus
additional ligands to control reactivity and stereoselectivity.12
The development of lanthanide complexes acting as bifunc-
tional catalysts was pioneered by the seminal work of
Shibasaki et al.13
To implement a cycloaddition transition state with a high
level of organization the nucleophilic catalyst should be
directly connected to the Lewis acid template. We envisaged
that an oxophilic lanthanide would tightly bind to an
alcoholate moiety while a tertiary amino group would
undergo a hemilabile coordination still permitting a sufficient
reactivity to nucleophilically trap a vinylketene intermediate.
Although Er(III) complexes with aliphatic ꢀ- or γ-amino
alcohols possessing a tertiary amino group have to our
knowledge never been previously described in the literature,
Er(OTf)3 was chosen for these investigations as lanthanide
source owing to the combination of (a) a comparatively low
price of Er which is linked to its importance for telecom-
munication industry14 and (b) a relatively small ionic radius
(as a consequence of the lanthanide contraction)15 which
a Compound 2a was slowly added by syringe pump over 120 min (1:1
stoichiometry of both substrates). Stirring was continued for an additional
150 min. b NMR yields using MeNO2 as internal standard. c Determined
by chiral column HPLC. d Compound 2a was added over 30 min. e T )
-10 °C. f 1.5 equiv of Er(OTf)3. g 2.5 equiv of DIPEA. h 0.2 equiv of 4b.
i 0.1 equiv of 4b. j 0.05 equiv of 4b.
(9) In our previous work, Sn(OTf)2 was used as cocatalyst but was not
directly involved in the cycloaddition step itself, see ref 6.
With N-methylephedrine 4a, δ-lactone 5a was formed with
a promising ee of 74% (entry 2), yet the yield was low.
Replacing the NMe2 group by a pyrrolidine unit not only
enhanced the reactivity (yield ) 35%) but also resulted in
an ee value of 95% (entry 3). The nucleophilicity of the
tertiary amino group is essential as entries 4 and 5 demon-
strate, in which the steric accessibility and the electron
density of the amino group are diminished with the conse-
quence of reduced or no reactivity. Whereas in the case of
a tertiary or primary alcohol moiety the title reaction was
retarded (entries 6 and 7), a methyl-protected hydroxyl
impeded high enantioselectivity (entry 8), while TMS
protection gave no product at all. Entry 9 demonstrates that
(10) For the application of bifunctional catalysts in [2 + 2] cycloadditions
of ketenes, see, e.g.: (a) LiClO4 in combination with O-protected cinchona
alkaloids: Zhu, C.; Shen, X.; Nelson, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
5352. (b) Metal triflates including Er(OTf)3 in combination with O-protected
cinchona alkaloids: Calter, M. A.; Tretyak, O. A.; Flaschenriem, C. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 1809. (c) In(OTf)3 in combination with O-protected cinchona
alkaloids: France, S.; Shah, M. H.; Weatherwax, A.; Wack, H.; Roth, J. P.;
Lectka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1206. (d) Oxazaborolidine catalyst:
Gnanadesikan, V.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4943. (e) A hybrid
cinchona alkaloid/salene-Co complex: Lin, Y.-M.; Boucau, J.; Li, Z.;
Casarotto, V.; Lin, J.; Nguyen, A. N.; Ehrmantraut, J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
567
.
(11) Dual activation catalysis review: Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4566.
(12) Review about the use of lanthanides in asymmetric catalysis:
Mikami, K.; Terada, M.; Matsuzawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
3554.
(13) (a) Shibasaki, M.; Sasai, H.; Arai, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 1236. (b) Shibasaki, M.; Kanai, M.; Funabashi, K. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 1989. (c) Kanai, M.; Kato, N.; Ichikawa, E.; Shibasaki,
M. Synlett 2005, 1491. (d) Shibasaki, M.; Matsunaga, S. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2006, 35, 269.
(14) Bellemare, A. Prog. Quant. Electron. 2003, 27, 211. Er(OTf)3 is,
e.g., ca. 4-5 times less expensive than Yb(OTf)3.
(15) Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751.
2020
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008