tion-iodination method6 for the installation of the requisite
C8-ethyl substituent in the trans configuration (Scheme 3).
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Vinyl Dibromide 4a
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Vinyl Stannane 3a
a Reagents, conditions, and yields: (a) CBr4, PPh3, 2,6-lutidine,
CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 96%; (b) n-BuLi, THF, -78 °C, then TMSCl,
-78 °C to rt, 98%; (c) Cp2ZrHCl, THF, 50 °C, 1 h, then I2, THF,
rt, 89%, >20:1 crude dr; (d) EtZnX, Pd(PPh3)4, THF, rt, 96%; (e)
DDQ, CH2Cl2/H2O, rt, 83%; (f) (COCl)2, DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2,
-78 °C; 92%; (g) CrCl2, Bu3SnCHI2, DMF, 0 °C to rt, 68%, E/Z
>20:1.
a Reagents, conditions, and yields: (a) (R)-7, TiCl4, CH2Cl2, -30
°C, 84%, 10:1 crude dr; (b) TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to
rt, 92%; (c) Ac2O, pyr, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt, 99%; (d) O3, pyr,
MeOH/CH2Cl2, -78 °C, then Me2S; (e) (R)-7, TiCl4, CH2Cl2, -30
°C, 21a to 22a: 0%; 21b to 22b: 68% (two steps), >20:1 crude
dr; (f) CBr4, PPh3, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 82% (two steps);
(g) K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 99%; (h) TIPSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0
°C, 90%; (i) PCC, CH2Cl2, rt, 85%.
We have shown that upon exposure to an electrophilic iodine
source (I2, NIS), iododesilylation of 18 occurred with
retention of alkene configuration. However, we felt that
elaboration of the benzyl ether moiety into the corresponding
vinylstannane, prior to iodide formation and cross-coupling,
would represent a more convergent approach. Accordingly,
treatment of 18 with DDQ followed by Swern oxidation17
yielded aldehyde 19, which participated in a chromium(II)-
mediated vinylstannation18 with freshly prepared Bu3SnCHI2
to complete the preparation of 3 in seven steps from aldehyde
16.
Organosilane reagents such as 7 provide rapid access to
polypropionate fragments with high levels of selectivity. At
first glance, the all-syn C16-C20 stereochemistry in (-)-
callystatin A is a readily accessible target, with the (R)-
configuration of 7 directing the C16 and C18 methyl
stereocenters. Accordingly, our synthesis began with treat-
ment of aldehyde 819 with (R)-7 in the presence of TiCl4 to
yield homoallylic alcohol 20 as the syn-syn product in 84%
yield (Scheme 4). Protection of 20 as a silyl ether and
oxidative cleavage afforded aldehyde 21a, setting the stage
for a second crotylation reaction. However, exposure of 21a
to (R)-7 in the presence of TiCl4 produced homoallylic
alcohol 20 in >80% yield, with no trace of desired alcohol
22a. We rationalize that a Lewis acid promoted deprotec-
tion-retroaldol-crotylation sequence led to exclusive for-
mation of undesired 20. Indeed, the analogous reactions with
other acid-sensitive ether protecting groups at C19 (OBn,
OTES) yielded similar results.20 To alleviate this difficulty,
the acetate analogue 21b was synthesized and subjected to
crotylation conditions. Although 21b proved remarkably
unreactive, prolonged reaction time (-30 °C, 2 d) resulted
in formation of the desired homologated alcohol 22b in good
yield. Ozonolytic cleavage and dibromoolefination21 of the
free alcohol22 directly provided 23, possessing the fragment’s
full C14-C22 carbon skeleton. Concerned with removal of
the C19 acetate at a late stage, we carried out a two-step
protecting group exchange sequence to generate 25. Interest-
ingly, TIPS protection of diol 24 proceeded with complete
regioselectivity at C19, suggesting the different steric
environments of the two alcohol functionalities. Oxidation
of 25 using PCC completed the advanced fragment 4 in nine
steps and 32% overall yield from 8.
With access to the three advanced fragments, we envi-
sioned the rapid assembly of (-)-callystatin A beginning with
C13-C14 carbon-carbon bond formation (Scheme 5). A
Pd2dba3-mediated cross-coupling9 between stannane 3 and
dibromide 4 yielded vinyl bromide 26, with the desired (E,Z)-
diene as the only observed product isomer. Installation of
the C14-methyl group by the Negishi protocol23 proceeded
smoothly without epimerization or nucleophilic addition to
the ketone. Treatment of 27 with the electrophilic iodine
source NIS,24 however, resulted in undesired regioselective
iodination of the C14-C15 olefin. Close inspection of the
(17) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651-1660.
(18) (a) Hodgson, D. M.; Boulton, L. T.; Maw, G. N. Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 3713-3724. (b) Hodgson, D. M.; Foley, A. M.; Boulton, L. T.; Lovell,
P. J.; Maw, G. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 2911-2922.
(19) White, J. D.; Bolton, D. L.; Dantanarayana, A. P.; Fox, C. M. J.;
Hiner, R. N.; Jackson, R. W.; Sakuma, K.; Warrier, U. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 1908-1939.
(21) Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 3769-3772.
(22) Unusual reactivity of similar intermediates has been reported. See
refs 4a,e,f and 5b for details.
(23) For application in related ene-yne systems, see: Shi, J.; Zeng, X.;
Negishi, E. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1825-1828.
(24) Stamos, D. P.; Taylor, A. G.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
8647-8650.
(20) Hydroxy aldehyde (21, R ) H) displayed similar reactivity.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 18, 2004
3205