Cyclization of Ketenimines
SCHEME 1. Planned Intramolecular [2+2]
Cycloaddition of N-Acylimino-ketenimines
SCHEME 2. [2+2] Cycloaddition of the
Imino-ketenimine 3 Leading to Bicycle 4
and the particular electronic characteristics of N-
acylimines (see below), led us to explore, theoretically and
experimentally, if the CdN bond of an N-acylimine would
participate in a [2+2] intramolecular cycloaddition with
a ketenimine function. To this end, we planned placing
both functionalities on a Z-1,2-vinylic or o-phenylene
scaffold as represented in structure 1 (Scheme 1), as our
previous work in the intramolecular cyclization of other
imino-ketenimines supported in similar frameworks oc-
curred successfully.5 If successful, these cycloadditions
should lead to adducts 2.
It has been demonstrated that the intermolecular [2+2]
cycloadditions of ketenimines with imines yielding aze-
tidin-2-imines only takes place if the ketenimines bear
electron-withdrawing substituents at the nitrogen atom,
which increase their electrophilic character.6 By contrast,
we demonstrated that the intramolecular [2+2] cycload-
dition of imino-ketenimines is considerably easier than
the intermolecular version if both functional groups are
incorporated into an appropriate scaffold, and does not
require the presence of electron-withdrawing groups on
the ketenimine nitrogen.5
close to 50°. By contrast, the s-trans conformer is the
global minimum energy conformation of 2-azabutadiene.
Wiberg8a stated that the delocalization index of the lone
pair at the nitrogen atom in methyleneformamide is
higher than that of the 2-azabutadiene. This fact was
explained by the greater electron-withdrawing character
of the CdO bond when compared with the CdC bond,
accounting for the calculated minimum energy conforma-
tion that allows the partial delocalization of the nitrogen
lone pair into the CdO bond as well as some conjugation
between the CdN and the CdO π-systems. Other reports
on the structure and conformation of more complex
N-acylimines support these hypotheses.9
Accordingly, the iminic nitrogen atom of N-acylimines
is probably less nucleophilic than that of simple imines
where it is linked to an sp3-hybridized carbon atom and,
hence, the [2+2] cycloaddition reactions of N-acylimino-
ketenimines type 1 seem a priori more difficult than those
of the previously essayed imino-ketenimines represented
by structure 3. Nevertheless, the tether linking the
N-acylimine and the ketenimine moieties in the imino-
ketenimines 1, an o-phenylene or vinylic fragment, may
increase the electrophilic character of the ketenimine
moiety by communicating across its π-system the CdO
function with the NdC π-system of the ketenimine
component. This feature might compensate the presum-
ably poor nucleophilic character of their iminic nitrogen
atom.
On the other hand, an alternative cyclization mode of
N-acylimino-ketenimines 1 that can be envisaged is the
6π-electrocyclic ring closure leading to the [1,3]-oxazine
5 (Scheme 3). Moreover, due to its likely pseudopericyclic
character,10 a low-energy barrier can be presumed for this
transformation.
A
common nonconcerted mechanism has been
established5c-e,7 for all the [2+2] cycloaddition reactions
of imino-ketenimines that have been approached by
computational methods. For example, the conversion of
N-(4-azapenta-1,4-dienyl)ketenimine (3) into its [2+2]
cycloadduct 4 takes place in two steps. The first one
involves the nucleophilic attack of the iminic nitrogen
lone pair onto the central carbon atom of the ketenimine
moiety, leading to a zwitterionic intermediate INT that,
in the second step, undergoes a 4π-conrotatory ring
closure (Scheme 2). The conjugated CdC bond linked to
the keteniminic nitrogen enhances the electrophilic
character of the ketenimine moiety favoring the cycliza-
tion process.5c
We have found in the literature several reports dealing
with the electronic description and the rotational profile
of the simplest N-acylimine, methyleneformamide.8 In-
terestingly, its computed global minimum energy con-
formation is s-cisoid, and it shows a torsional angle θCNCO
(5) (a) Alajar´ın, M.; Molina, P.; Vidal, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 8945-8948. (b) Alajar´ın, M.; Molina, P.; Vidal, A.; Tovar, F.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13449-13472. (c) Alajar´ın, M.; Vidal, A.; Tovar,
F.; Arrieta, A.; Lecea, B.; Coss´ıo, F. P. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 1106-
1117. (d) Coss´ıo, F. P.; Arrieta, A.; Lecea, B.; Alajar´ın, M.; Vidal, A.;
Tovar, F. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3633-3643. (e) Alajar´ın, M.; Vidal,
A.; Tovar, F.; Coss´ıo, F. P.; Arrieta, A.; Lecea, B. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 7512-7515. (f) Alajar´ın, M.; Vidal, A.; Orenes, R.-A. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 4222-4227.
(6) (a) Arnold, B.; Regitz, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979,
18, 320. (b) Van Camp, A.; Goossens, D.; Moya-Portugez, M.; March-
and-Brynaert, J.; Ghosez, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3081-3084.
(7) (a) Alajar´ın, M.; Sa´nchez-Andrada, P.; Vidal, A.; Tovar, F. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2636-2643. (b) Alajarin, M.; Vidal, A.; Tovar, F.;
Sa´nchez-Andrada, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6259-6261.
(8) (a) Wiberg, K. B.; Rablen, P. R.; Marquez, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 8654-8668. (b) See also: Allmann, R.; Kupfer, R.; Nagel,
M.; Wu¨rthwein, E.-U. Chem. Ber. 1984, 117, 1597-1605. (c) Wu¨rth-
wein, E.-U.; Kupfer, R.; Kaliba, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1983,
22, 252-253. (d) McAllister, M. A.; Tidwell, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1994, 2239-2248.
(9) See for example: (a) Gross, L. A.; Baird, G. S.; Hoffman, R. C.;
Baldridge, K. K.; Tsien, R. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2000, 97, 11990-
11995. (b) Yarbrough, D.; Wachter, R. M.; Kallio, K.; Matz, M. V.;
Remington, S. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98, 462-467.
(10) (a) Birney, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 243-251. (b) Alajar´ın,
M.; Sa´nchez-Andrada, P.; Coss´ıo, F. P.; Arrieta, A.; Lecea, B. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 8470-8477.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2005 1341