H. Nakamura et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 2697–2700
2699
-Bu
H
D
n
PdCl2(PPh3)2 (10 mol %)
dppe (10 mol %)
PdCl2(PPh3)2 (10 mol %)
dppe (10 mol %)
n
-Bu
n
-Bu
N
Ph
1a
1a
+
N
N
CDCl3,100
94%
º
C,
H-Nu, 100 ºC
Ph
Ph
Nu
CCl3
CCl3
2a
2a'
6a: Nu = CH2NO2, 43%
b:
(3 : 1)
Nu = CH2CN, 35%
Scheme 2. Deuterium labeling study.
Scheme 4. Addition–cyclization of nitromethane and acetonitrile to ortho-
alkynylaldimine 1a.
acetate (30:1) to give 3-butyl-2-phenyl-1-(trichloromethyl)-
1,2-dihydroisoquinoline 2a (179 mg, 0.47 mmol, 96% yield)
as a white solid.
Since the AgOTf-catalyzed addition–cyclization of pro-
nucleophiles, such as nitromethane, malononitrile, acetyl-
acetone, and dimethylmalonate, to ortho-alkynylaldimines
has been reported,3 we employed nitromethane and aceto-
nitrile as pronucleophiles for the current reaction. How-
ever, these were not suitable pronucleophiles under
palladium-catalyzed conditions and the corresponding
adducts 6a and 6b were obtained in 43% and 35% yields,
respectively (Scheme 4).
In conclusion, we found that the palladium-catalyzed
addition–cyclization of pronucleophiles to ortho-alkynyl-
aldimines to affords the functionalized 1,2-dihydro-
isoquinolines. Chloroform underwent the C–H insertion
by palladium in this transformation. Since various trans-
formations from a trichloromethyl group have been
reported, such as the C–Cl addition of olefins,8 ester forma-
tion,9 and alkene and alkyne formations,10 we believe that
the current finding enables us to conduct new atom-
economical strategy for carbon–carbon bond formation
in organic synthesis.
In order to clarify the mechanism of the current 1,2-
dihydroisoquinoline formation reaction, a deuterium label-
ing study was performed as shown in Scheme 2. The reac-
tion of 1a was carried out in CDCl3 to give a 3:1 mixture of
1-(trichloromethyl)-1,2-dihydroisoquinoline 2a and 4-
deuterio-1-(trichloromethyl)-1,2-dihydroisoquinoline 2a0.
Based on the result of the deuterium labeling study, the
proposed mechanism is shown in Scheme 3. The oxidative
insertion of palladium(0) to C–H bond of chloroform fol-
lowed by p-coordination with 1 at a carbon–carbon triple
bond would form complex 3, and the intramolecular nucle-
ophilic attack of the imine nitrogen to alkyne would gener-
ate the palladium anion species 4. There would be
equilibrium between 3 and 4. The migration of the hydride
on a palladium to the isoquinoline ring followed by the
nucleophilic attack of a trichloromethyl anion to the imin-
ium ion of 5 would give 2 and the palladium(0) is
regenerated.
In the previous report by Asao et al.,6 chloroform
underwent hydrogen absorption by the zwitterionic iso-
quinoline species directly in the reaction course, which
resulted in higher D content of the product in their deute-
rium labeling study. In the current reaction, the hydrogen
on the trichloromethylpalladium hydride complex gener-
ated by the C–H insertion of palladium to chloroform
would be readily be exchanged from other hydrogen
sources in the reaction mixture. Therefore, the D content
of the product in Scheme 2 became low.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scien-
tific Research on Priority Areas ‘Advanced Molecular
Transformations of Carbon Resources’ from the Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology,
Japan.
References and notes
1. (a) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1595; (b) List,
B. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5573.
2
2. (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Kubota, Y.; Honda, Y.; Fukui, H.; Asao, N.;
Nemoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3161; (b) Shida, N.;
Kubota, Y.; Fukui, H.; Asao, N.; Kadota, I.; Yamamoto, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5023.
H
CCl3
Pd0
PdII
H
R1
3. (a) Kumagai, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 13632; (b) Xu, L.-W.; Xia, C.-G.; Li, L. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 8482; (c) Ooi, T.; Kameda, M.; Fujii, J.; Maruoka, K. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 2397; (d) Uraguchi, D.; Terada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 5356; (e) Matsunaga, S.; Kumagai, N.; Harada, S.;
Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4712; (f) Marigo, M.;
Kjrsgaard, A.; Juhl, K.; Gathergood, N.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Eur.
J. 2003, 9, 2359; (g) Trost, B. M.; Terrell, L. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 338; (h) Juhl, K.; Gathergood, N.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2995; (i) Nugent, B. M.; Yoder, R. A.;
Johnston, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3418; (j) Nishiwaki, N.;
Knudsen, K. R.; Gothelf, K. V.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 2992; (k) Qian, C.; Gao, F.; Chen, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
H PdII CCl3
N
R2
5
Cl3C Pd
1
CCl3
R1
CCl3
R1
H
Pd
Pd
H
N
N
R2
R2
4
3
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanism.