together with the ease of preparation, make the conjugate 1 an
appealing candidate to be tested in biological experiments.
Studies addressed to evaluate its capability to induce DNA
photocleavage are underway. We believe that the extension of
the present approach to the preparation of multicharged
conjugates integrating more intercalator and photodonor
units in their molecular skeleton may hopefully pave the way
for the development of novel classes of NO donors for
potential applications in biomedical research where NO re-
lease with precise spatiotemporal control is required.
This work was supported by University of Catania (Progetti
di Ateneo).
Fig. 5 NO released upon 420 nm light irradiation of the complex
Notes and references
1-ct-DNA phosphate buffer (1 mM, pH 7.4) at 25 1C. [ct-DNA]bp
10 mM; [1] = 6 mM.
=
1 (a) L. J. Ignarro, Nitric Oxide Biology and Pathobiology, 1st edn,
Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2000, p. 41; (b) E. Culotta and D.
E. Koshland, Science, 1992, 258, 1862; (c) F. Murad, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1857; (d) R. F. Furchgott, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1870.
where [ct-DNA]bp is the concentration of the polynucleotide in
base pairs, eA, eF and eB correspond to Aobs/[1], the extinction
coefficient for the free 1 and the extinction coefficient for the
totally bound form of 1, respectively.14 By the ratio of the
slope to intercept of the linear plot reported in the inset of
2 G. Hummel, A. J. Fisher, S. M. Martin, F. Q. Schafer and G. R.
Buettner, Free Radical Biol. Med., 2006, 40, 501.
3 (a) W. Xu, L. Z. Liu, M. Loizidou, M. Ahmed and I. G. Charles,
Cell. Res., 2002, 12, 311; (b) B. Mitrovic, L. J. Ignarro, H. V.
Vinters, M. A. Akerms, I. Schmid and C. Uittenbogaart, Neu-
roscience, 1995, 65, 531; (c) Y. Hou, J. Wang, P. R. Andreana, G.
Cantauria, S. Tarasia, L. Sharp, P. G. Braunschweiger and P. G.
Wang, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 2255.
Fig. 4A, a Kb value of 1.1 Æ 0.3 Â 104
M
À1, in excellent
agreement with those reported for anthracene derivatives
including cationic functions,12 was obtained.
More insights into the binding mode were provided by ICD
spectroscopy. Due to the absence of chiral centers, compound
1 is not optically active by itself. As shown in Fig. 4B the
presence of ct-DNA induces optical activity as a consequence
of its close proximity with the asymmetric environment of the
biopolymer helix. In particular, it can be noted that the ICD
absorption maxima correspond fairly well to those of the
anthracene unit of 1 whereas no relevant ICD signals are
noted in the correspondence of the main absorption region of
the photodonor unit of 1 (dominant above 380 nm). Since ICD
signals are dependent on the cube of the distance of the two
interacting partners15 our findings seem to be consistent with a
binding fashion involving the intercalation of unit i of the
conjugate and the localization of the unit p mainly at the DNA
periphery, as pictorially sketched in Fig. 1.
4 (a) J. B. Hibbs Jr, R. R. Taintor and Z. Vavrin, Science, 1987, 235,
473; (b) T. deRojas-Walker, S. Tamir, H. Ji, J. S. Wishnok and S.
R. Tannenbaum, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 1995, 8, 473; (c) K. Fuku-
hara, M. Kurihara and N. Miyata, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
8662.
5 P. G. Wang, M. Xian, X. Tang, X. Wu, Z. Wen, T. Cai and A. J.
Janczuk, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 1091.
6 Q. Jia, A. Janczuk, T. Cai, M. Xian, Z. Wen and P. G. Wang,
Expert Opin. Ther. Pat., 2002, 12, 819.
7 (a) S. Sortino, S. Petralia, G. Compagnini, S. Conoci and G.
Condorelli, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1914; (b) E. B.
Caruso, S. Petralia, S. Conoci, S. Giuffrida and S. Sortino, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 480; (c) E. B. Caruso, E. Cicciarella
and S. Sortino, Chem. Commun., 2007, 5028; (d) S. Conoci, S.
Petralia and S. Sortino, US Pat. Appl., pending.
8 The photochemical mechanism for NO photorelease involves a
nitro-to-nitrite rearrangement followed by the rupture of the O–N
bond to generate a phenoxyl radical and NO.
9 Estimated by the end of the absorption spectra of the model
compounds 2 and 3.
The suitability of 1 to generate NO when bound to ct-DNA
was demonstrated by NO photorelease experiments carried
out in the presence of 10 mM ct-DNA (1 complexation 4
90%). As shown in Fig. 5, NO photogeneration strictly
depending on the illumination conditions was observed. A
remarkable point of interest of this work is the comparable
efficiency of the NO photodelivery in the absence and in the
presence of DNA. This excludes potential photoinduced elec-
tron transfer between the excited 1 and the DNA bases as
competitive pathways to the NO generation.
10 The overlap integral J was numerically calculated to be 4.68 Â
10À11 MÀ1 cm3.
11 A potential photoinduced electron transfer involving the excited
anthracene and the adjacent secondary amino group as electron
donor is, of course, out of question in light of the protonation of
this latter under our experimental conditions (pKa 4 8).
12 See, for example: (a) C. V. Kumar and E. H. Asuncion, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 8547; (b) C. V. Kumar and E. H. Asuncion,
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1219.
13 C. V. Kumar, in Photochemistry in Organized and Constrained
Media, ed. V. Ramamurthy, VCH Publisher, New York, 1991, pp.
785–816.
14 A. M. Pyle, J. P. Rehmann, R. Meshoyer, C. V. Kumar, N. J.
Turro and J. K. Barton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 3051.
15 E. C. Long and J. K. Barton, Acc. Chem. Res., 1990, 23, 271.
16 An example of NO photodonor incorporating a potential DNA
intercalator in its molecular skeleton has been recently reported by
Miyata and colleagues.4c No investigations demonstrating affinity
for DNA and ability to generate NO nearby were reported,
however.
In summary, we report a photoactivated, multifunctional
conjugate that, to our knowledge, represents the first example
of an NO donor that effectively bind to DNA and enables
generation of this radical species in its close proximity, under
the exclusive control of visible light stimuli, with the additional
advantage of amplifying the NO delivery via an efficient
photoinduced energy transfer mechanism.16 These features,
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Chem. Commun., 2008, 1971–1973 | 1973