transition metals.9Only the Rh-carbene process has proven
to be practical for synthesizing a series of carbapenems. This
method involves four reaction sequences: diazetization of
ꢀ-ketoester, Rh-catalyzed carbene insertion to the N-H bond,
activation of the ketoester with phosphoryl chloride or triflic
anhydride, and last, incorporation of a C-2 side chain. Despite
its successful industrial application, this procedure suffers
several drawbacks, such as the use of an expensive catalyst,
harsh reaction conditions, and long reaction steps. Therefore,
there is still great interest in an economical protocol that
can rapidly lead to varieties of carbapenems to meet clinical
demands and that can uncover new types of carbapenems
with enhanced performance.
cessive coupling strategy. In our procedure, the C-S side
chains are incorporated in an intermolecular manner, and the
bicyclic nucleus is made by an intramolecular regioselective
coupling14 of ꢀ-lactam with an endo-orientated vinyl iodide.
Previously, we reported a convenient method for the
preparation of 4-propargyl-2-azetidinone 2 from 4-acetoxy-
2-azetidinone and propargyl bromides via a zinc-mediated
Barbier-type reaction.15 Subsequently, we investigated the
stereoselective diiodination of the alkyne 2 to give the (E)-
1,2-diiodoalkene 3, using a modified method (Scheme 2),
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the (E)-1,2-Dihaloalkene Intermediate
In view of the fact that carbapenems possess both vinyl
sulfide and enamide groups, we speculated that a series of
carbapenems could be synthesized through two successive
cross-coupling reactions as shown in Scheme 1. Metal-
Scheme 1. Structure of Thienamycin and Synthetic Strategy
in which the ꢀ-lactam nitrogen was first selectively iodinated
by NIS, the triple bond was diiodinated by ICl/NaI, and
finally the iodide substituted on the nitrogen was removed
by NaHSO3, giving an overall yield of 79%.16 The triple
bond could also be diiodinated directly and selectively by
treating with iodine in the presence of a source of iodide
ion.
Starting from (E)-R,ꢀ-diiodoacrylic acid ester 3, we set
out to study Cu(I)-catalyzed intramolecular C-N coupling.
Initial ligand screening was performed using CuI with
Cs2CO3 or K3PO4 as the base. To our delight, among the
seven ligands examined, N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine (L1),
N,N-dimethylglycine (L2), and 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) (L6)
gave good results. L6, in particular, produced the desired
enamide at 87% yield (Table 1, entries 2, 3, and 7). When
using 1,10-phenanthroline (L3) or N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyleth-
ylenediamine (L4) as ligand, deiodination occurred to give
the precursor 2 in 40-50% yield (entries 4 and 5). We also
tested other copper(I) systems like copper thiophene-2-
carboxylate (CuTC) and [Cu(phen)(PPh3)2]NO3, which have
shown excellent reactivities for synthesis of enamides12b and
vinylsulfide.13 No product was formed using CuTC (entry
11), while [Cu(phen)(PPh3)2]NO3 gave only unproductive
results similar to those obtained with L3 and L4 (entry 10).
Notably, under Mori’s conditions17 with Pd(OAc)2/DPEphos,
deiodination occurred and gave more than 50% alkyne side
product, along with a trace of cyclization product (entry 12).
On the basis of the good performance of bpy, several other
solvents and bases were screened. Toluene was the best
solvent, while polar solvents such as DMF, NMP, THF, and
ethanol gave much lower yields. Cs2CO3 or K2CO3 gave
catalyzed carbon-heteroatom bond formation has attracted
much attention in organic synthesis, such as copper-catalyzed
cross-coupling reactions10 for the synthesis of enol ethers,11
vinylsulfide, and enamides. N-Vinylation reactions catalyzed
by copper(I), particularly in combination with bidentate
amine ligands, is a mild and efficient protocol for stereo-
controlled coupling of vinyl halides with amides.12 In
addition, synthesis of vinyl sulfides via copper(I)-catalyzed
stereospecific cross-coupling of vinyl iodides and thiols has
recently been developed.13 In this paper, we report an
efficient synthesis of carbapenems based on this two suc-
(8) (a) Trost, B. M.; Chen, S. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6053.
(b) Galland, J. C.; Roland, S.; Malpart, J.; Savignac, M.; Genet, J. P. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 621. (c) Kozawa, Y.; Mori, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 3064.
(9) (a) Mori, M.; Kozawa, Y.; Nishida, M.; Kanamaru, M.; Onozuka,
K.; Takimoto, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3245. (b) Lee, P. H.; Kim, H.; Lee,
K.; Kim, M.; Noh, K.; Kim, H.; Seomoon, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005,
44, 1840.
(10) For reviews, see: (a) Dehli, J. R.; Legros, J.; Bolm, C. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 973. (b) Kunz, K.; Scholz, U.; Ganzer, D. Synlett 2003,
2428. (c) Ley, S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
5400.
(11) (a) Keegstra, M. A. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 2681. (b) Nordmann,
G. S.; Buchwald, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4978. (c) Wan, Z.; Jones,
C. D.; Koenig, T. M.; Pu, Y. J.; Mitchell, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
8257.
(12) (a) Ogawa, T.; Kiji, T.; Hayami, K.; Suzuki, H. Chem. Lett. 1991,
1443. (b) Shen, R.; Porco, J. A., Jr Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1333. (c) Jiang, L.;
Job, G. E.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3667. (d) Pan,
X.; Cai, Q.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1809. (e) Coleman, R. S.; Liu,
P.-H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 577. (f) Han, C.; Shen, R.; Su, S.; Porco, J. A., Jr
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 27. (g) Trost, B. M.; Stiles, D. T. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
2117.
(14) Toumi, M.; Couty, F.; Evano, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 572.
(15) Jiang, B.; Tian, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7942.
(16) (a) Hollins, R. A.; Campos, M. P. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3931.
(b) Henaff, N.; Whiting, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 395. (c)
Bellina, F.; Colzi, F.; Mannina, L.; Rossi, R.; Viel, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 10175.
(13) Bates, C. G.; Saejueng, P.; Doherty, M. Q.; Venkataraman, D. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 5005.
(17) Kozawa, Y.; Mori, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8068.
2738
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 13, 2008