194
A. B. Shakirova et al.
TABLE 1. Yields, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Parameters of the IR and 1H NMR Spectra of the Synthesized Compounds
Compound Empirical formula Yield, %
M.p., °C
IR spectrum: nmax, cm – 1
1H NMR spectrum (solvent): d, ppm
Ia
Ib
C18H19ClN2O
C18H19ClN2O2
77
62
113 – 115
1320, 1370, 1390, 1460,
1510, 1590, 1640, 3120,
3150, 3320, 3380
CDCl3, 2.1 (d, 6H, 2CH3), 3.76 (m, 2H, CH2), 5.4 (m,
H, CH=), 6.26 – 7.50 (m, arom. H), 7.6 (s, 2H, NH,
CONH)
120 – 121
1310, 1450, 1570, 1640,
3200, 3350
(CD3)2SO, 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.57 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.87
(d, 2H, CH2), 5.57 (t, H, CH=), 6.07 – 7.87 (m, arom. H,
NH, 9H), 9.1 (s, H, CONH)
Ic
Id
C17H16BrClN2O
C15H15BrClN3O
75
45
122 – 124
71 – 73
1340, 1450, 1520, 1590,
1630, 3220
CDCl3, 1.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.8 (d, 2H, CH2), 5.43 (m, H,
CH=), 6.7 – 7.5 (m, arom. H), 7.7 (s, 2H, NH, CONH)
1370, 1460, 1520, 1560,
1580, 1650, 3340
CF3COOH, 2.0 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.73 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.53 (d,
H, CH=), 6.5 (d, 3H, Py), 6.8 – 8.47 (m, arom. H), 10.3
(s, 2H, NH, CONH)
IIa
IIb
IIc
IId
IIe
IIf
C20H21ClN2O2
C20H21ClN2O3
C19H18BrClN2O2
C17H17BrClN3O2
C20H21ClN2O2
C20H21ClN2O2
77
67
69
51
52
57
129 – 130
113 – 115
179 – 181
159 – 161
152 – 154
129 – 131
…
CDCl3, 1.78 (d, 6H, 2CH3), 2.23 (d, 3H, COCH3), 4.26
(m, 2H, CH2), 5.53 (m, H, CH=), 6.63 – 8.1 (m, arom.
H), 8.5 (s, H, CONH)
1310, 1410, 1450, 1640,
1680, 3200
CDCl3, 1.7 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.06 (d, 3H, COCH3), 3.72 (s,
3H, OCH3), 4.25 (t, 2H, CH2), 5.56 (m, H, CH=),
6.3 – 7.8 (m, arom. H), 8.03 (s, H, CONH)
1320, 1400, 1440, 1510,
1570, 1610
CF3COOH, 2.1 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.93 (d, 3H, COCH3), 5.38
(d, 2H, CH2), 5.78 (m, H, CH=), 7.1 – 8.3 (m, arom. H),
8.96 (s, H, CONH)
1300, 1380, 1400, 1450,
1470, 1490, 1520, 1580,
1590, 1680, 3080, 3230
CF3COOH, 1.87 (s, 3H3, CH3), 3.60 (d, 3H, COCH3),
4.03 (d, 2H, CH2), 5.53 (m, H, CH=), 6.93 – 8.43 (m,
arom. H), 10.7 (s, H, CONH)
1320, 1380, 1470, 1610, 3250 CDCl3, 2.0 (d, 9H, 2CH3, COCH3), 4.03 (m, 2H, CH2),
5.4 (m, H, CH=), 6.4 – 7.73 (m, arom. H), 7.8 (s, H,
CONH)
1330, 1460, 1510, 1560,
1610, 3200
CDCl3, 1.87 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.1 (d, 3H, COCH3), 4.31
(m, 2H, CH2), 5.58 (m, H, CH=), 6.9 – 8.1 (m, arom. H,
CONH, 9H)
IIg
III
C19H19ClN2O2
79
49
154 – 155
187 – 188
1300, 1310, 1380, 1410,
1450, 1490, 1640, 1680, 3210
…
C28H30BrClN2O2
1390, 1460, 1530, 1590,
1610, 1670, 3250
CF3COOH, 1.7 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.9 – 2.6 (d, 15H
1-adamantyl), 4.27 (d, 2H, CH2), 5.7 (m, H, CH=),
7.1 – 8.2 (m, arom. H), 9.3 (s, H, CONH)
EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGICAL PART
N-(3¢-chlorobuten-2¢-yl)-N-acetylanthranilic acid 4-ani-
sidide (IIb). A solution of 3.31 g (10 mmole) of compound
Ib in 6 ml of acetic anhydride was heated for 35 min on a wa-
ter bath and allowed to cool. Then the reaction mass was di-
luted with 50 ml of water and neutralized with sodium car-
bonate. The precipitate was separated by filtration and
recrystallized from ethanol; yield of compound IIb, 67%.
Analogous procedures were used to obtain compounds
IIa and IIc – IIg.
The antiinflammatory activity of the synthesized com-
pounds was studied on white mongrel rats weighing
180 – 220 g, bearing a carrageenan-induced foot edema
model. The compounds to be tested (in a dose of 50 mg/kg)
and the reference drug ortophen (10 mg/kg) were
intraperitoneally injected with a 2% starch jelly 1 h before
inducing inflammation. The degree of edema development
was evaluated oncometrically, by measuring the inflamed
foot volume 4 h after carrageenan injection (0.1 ml of an 1%
N-(3¢-chlorobuten-2¢-yl)-N-(adamant-1²-yl)anthranilic
acid 4-bromoanilide (III). To a solution of 3.79 g
(10 mmole) of N-(3¢-chlorobuten-2¢-yl)anthranilic acid
4-bromoanilide (Ic) in 10 ml of benzene was added 1.98 g
(10 mmole) of adamantane-1-carboxylic acid anhydride and
the mixture was heated for 30 min at 80°C. Then benzene
was distilled off and the reaction mass was diluted with
20 ml of methanol and neutralized by sodium carbonate. The
precipitate was recrystallized from a methanol – DMF mix-
ture (1 : 1); yield of compound III, 49%.
aqueous solution) [2].
The analgesic activity was studied by the “hot plate” test
on white mongrel mice weighing 18 – 23 g [3]. Here, the
compounds studied were introduced in a dose of 50 mg/kg
perorally 30 min before placing the animal onto a metal plate
heated to 53.5°C. The change in the pain reaction was evalu-
ated by measuring the time of animal staying on the hot plate