C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Protonation Constants for Pyrone Ligands as Measured
by Potentiometric Titrations
Table 2. Parameters Obtained from the Simultaneous Fitting of
1H NMRD and 17O NMR Data
constant
TRENMAM
TREN-Me-MAM
[Gd(TRENMAM)]
[Gd(TREN-Me-MAM)]
log K1
log K2
log K3
log K4
7.33(1)
5.76(1)
4.97(2)
3.84(2)
7.91(1)
6.30(2)
5.48(2)
4.46(2)
∆2/1019 s-2
298τv/ps
5.6 ( 0.3
19.0 ( 0.8
145 ( 6
1.1 ( 0.3
27.6 ( 0.9
1
10.8 ( 0.2
15.2 ( 1.2
120 ( 9
1.0 ( 0.4
22.4 ( 1.8
1
298τR/ps
298τM/ns
∆HM/kJ mol-1
Ev/kJa
r
r
GdH/Å
3.09 ( 0.2
3.04 ( 0.3
GdO/Åa
2.48
2.48
A/p/106 rad‚s-1
qa
-3.6 ( 0.2
2
4.0
2.27 ( 0.3
22
-3.8 ( 0.1
2
4.0
2.30 ( 0.2
22
a/Åa
D/10-5 cm2 s-1
ED/kJ mol-1a
a Values were fixed in the fitting procedure.
rate of the complexes versus concentration in the range of
0.5-100 mM (at 0.1 MHz and 298 K). From this relaxometric
approach, 0.1 M represents the lower limit of the solubility of the
complexes, a value that is almost an order of magnitude higher
than that for similar tripodal chelates.4
In conclusion, we have described a new class of pyrone-derived
tripodal chelators that form stable and soluble Gd3+ complexes with
high relaxivity for use as MRI-CA. The compounds are among the
most soluble with a q ) 2 value, and one of them can be readily
and economically synthesized from the food additive maltol.
Continuing studies with derivatives of TRENMAM and TREN-
Me-MAM are ongoing and will be reported in due course.
Figure 1. 1/T1 NMRD profiles of [Gd(TRENMAM)(H2O)2] (b) and
[Gd(TREN-Me-MAM)(H2O)2] (O), at 298 K and pH 7.2.
competent to bind metal ions without competition from protons
under these conditions (Figure S2). The pGd values of 19.27 (
0.08 and 19.03 ( 0.04 were determined for TRENMAM and
TREN-Me-MAM, respectively, indicating these pyrone ligands form
Gd3+ complexes with high stability (Figure S3). On the basis of
these experiments, the stability of these complexes rivals those of
the currently used MRI-CA1,4 and therefore should be quite adequate
for in vivo applications.
Acknowledgment. S.M.C. is supported by the University of
California, San Diego, a Hellman Faculty Scholar award, the
American Heart Association (0430009N), and the Research Cor-
poration. D.T.P. is supported by the NIH (GM-72129-01). K.N.R.
is supported by the NIH (HL69832). M.B. acknowledges support
from MIUR.
Having demonstrated that pyrone-based complexes were suf-
ficiently stable and soluble for use as MRI-CA, we sought to
evaluate their physical properties as contrast agents. Several
measurements were performed, including nuclear magnetic reso-
nance dispersion (NMRD) profiles, pH-dependent relaxometry, and
variable temperature 17O NMR relaxometry. The relaxivity, r1p, of
the complexes, as measured at 20 MHz and 298 K, is 9.3 and 8.2
mM-1 s-1 for [Gd(TRENMAM)(H2O)2] and [Gd(TREN-Me-
MAM)(H2O)2], respectively, and these values are constant in the
pH range of 4-9. These values are very similar to those found for
[Gd(TREN-Me-3,2-HOPO)(H2O)2] and related chelates, suggesting
that in the pyrone complexes the Gd3+ ion retains two water
molecules in its inner coordination sphere. This was confirmed by
a detailed NMRD (at 298 and 310 K, Figure S4) and variable
temperature 17O NMR (at 2.12 T, Figure S5) study. Figure 1 shows
the 1/T1 NMRD profiles of the two complexes recorded at 298 K
over the frequency range of 0.01-70 MHz. A simultaneous fitting
of both the NMRD and 17O NMR data provided the parameters
listed in Table 2.
The complex [Gd(TRENMAM)(H2O)2] shows a slightly higher
relaxivity than that of [Gd(TREN-Me-MAM)(H2O)2] over the entire
range of magnetic field strength that is explained by a shorter value
of ∆2 and a slightly longer rotational correlation time τR. On the
other hand, both complexes are endowed with a fast rate of water
exchange (298kex ≈ 8 × 108 s-1), similar to that measured for the
Gd3+ aqua ion.4 The very rapid water exchange kinetics15 may
represent an advantage for MRI-CA applications at high fields
(80-100 MHz), where the optimal τM values for achieving high
relaxivities are close to 1 ns.8 Finally, we measured the relaxation
Supporting Information Available: Details for syntheses, struc-
tures, titration experiments, and complete ref 15. X-ray crystallographic
ref 289563). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Caravan, P.; Ellison, J. J.; McMurry, T. J.; Lauffer, R. B. Chem. ReV.
1999, 99, 2293-2352.
(2) Xu, J.; Franklin, S. J.; Whisenhunt, D. W., Jr.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7245-7246.
(3) Thompson, M. K.; Botta, M.; Nicolle, G.; Helm, L.; Aime, S.; Merbach,
A. E.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14274-14275.
(4) Raymond, K. N.; Pierre, V. C. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16, 3-8.
(5) Cohen, S. M.; Xu, J.; Radkov, E.; Raymond, K. N.; Botta, M.; Barge, A.;
Aime, S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5747-5756.
(6) Hajela, S. P.; Johnson, A. R.; Xu, J.; Sunderland, C. J.; Cohen, S. M.;
Caulder, D. L.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 3208-3216.
(7) Johnson, A. R.; O’Sullivan, B.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39,
2652-2660.
(8) Doble, D. M.; Botta, M.; Wang, J.; Aime, S.; Barge, A.; Raymond, K. N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10758-10759.
(9) Pierre, V. C.; Botta, M.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
504-505.
(10) Thompson, K. H.; Orvig, C. Metal Ions Biol. Syst. 2004, 41, 221-252.
(11) Pace, P.; Nizi, E.; Pacini, B.; Pesci, S.; Matassa, V.; DeFrancesco, R.;
Altamura, S.; Summa, V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3257-
3261.
(12) Liu, Z. D.; Piyamongkol, S.; Liu, D. Y.; Khodr, H. H.; Lu, S. L.; Hider,
R. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 563-573.
(13) Cohen, S. M.; O’Sullivan, B.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39,
4339-4346.
(14) Doble, D. M. J.; Melchior, M.; O’Sullivan, B.; Siering, C.; Xu, J.; Pierre,
V. C.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4930-4937.
(15) Mato-Iglesias, M.; et al. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4729-4731.
JA057954F
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 7, 2006 2223