excellent enantioselectivities, including amino ketone 1 and
enamides 2 and 3 (Figure 1).4 Recently, others have also
Figure 1. Functional groups of phthalimido.
succeeded in asymmetric hydrogenation of phthalimide-
bearing olefins.5 To further expand this usage, we herein
report a novel synthesis of N-phthaloyl dehydroamino acid
esters 6 and 7 via the reaction of vinyl bromide 4 or vinyl
tosylates 9 with potassium phthalimide 5. To our knowledge,
so far there is only one report concerning the synthesis of
such phthalimide-bearing substrates.6 As a complementary
approach, our present method enables convenient preparation
of new N-phthaloyl substrates in good to excellent yields.
Asymmetric hydrogenation with a Rh-TangPhos system
afforded the products with excellent ee’s (up to 99% ee).
Although intensive efforts have been made for the
synthetic route to N-acyl enamides,7 fewer studies have
focused on the N-phthaloyl counterpart. This is not surprising
in view of its less basic nitrogen atom stabilized by the
neighboring two carbonyl groups. In a pioneering study,
Trost reported the use of catalytic PPh3 to activate the
alkynoate regioselectively at the R-position prior to nucleo-
philic addition of phthalimide, leading to 7 (R ) aryl or H)
in excellent yields.6 However, asymmetric hydrogenation of
this type of substrates was not pursued. Furthermore, aliphatic
analogues cannot be prepared via this route because of
competitive side reactions.
Figure 2. ORTEP representation of 6a (50% probability for the
drawing of thermal ellipsoids).
Despite the moderate yield (43%), this transformation is
unique in that, unlike a typical metal-catalyzed coupling
reaction, the phthalimide unit is assembled at the ꢀ-position
with concomitant elimination of an R-bromo group, presum-
ably through a tandem Michael addition-elimination reaction
sequence.10 To study its scope, a variety of ꢀ-aryl ꢀ-dehy-
droamino acid esters 4a-l were prepared under similar
conditions. As shown in Table 1, substitution on the phenyl
ring has a remarkable effect on the separation yield of 6.
While electron-withdrawing NO2 enhances the reaction
(entries 2 and 3), those bearing an electron-donating sub-
Table 1. Preparation of ꢀ-Aryl ꢀ-N-Phthaloyl 6a-la
To gain full access to these structurally interesting
compounds, it is necessary to explore alternative methods.
We chose vinyl bromide as starting material, which can be
easily prepared in a few steps via Wittig reaction.8 The
coupling of sp2-bromide with amide has been extensively
studied, usually involing transition metal catalyst.9 Instead
of resorting to those metal catalysts, we looked for a simple
conversion to the desired product. To our delight, it was
found through various tests that simply heating the solution
of 4a and 5 in DMF gave the product 6a (Table 1, entry 1).
Its configuration was determined as Z via X-ray diffraction
experiment (Figure 2).
entry
R
T (°C)/time (h)
6
yieldb (%)
Z:Ec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
H
150/12
90/1
60/1
120/4
150/6
120/12
120/12
120/12
120/12
130/12
130/12
130/12
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
6h
6i
43
92
95
87
58
40
45
67
62
80
76
67
>50:1d
>50:1d
>50:1d
>50:1d
1.1:1
4-NO2
3-NO2
4-Cl
2-Cl
2-Br
(4) (a) Lei, A.; Wu, S.; He, M.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 1626. (b) Wang, C.-J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 4933. (c) Yang, Q.; Gao, W.; Deng, J.; Zhang, X. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 821.
1.2:1
3-Br
>50:1d
1.5:1
(5) (a) Huang, H.; Liu, X.; Deng, J.; Qiu, M.; Zheng, Z. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 3359. (b) Deng, J.; Duan, Z.-C.; Huang, J.-D.; Hu, X.-P.; Wang, D.-Y.;
Yu, S.-B.; Xu, X.-F.; Zheng, Z. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4825.
(6) Trost, B. M.; Dake, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7595.
(7) Zhao, H.; Vandenbossche, C. P.; Koenig, S. G.; Singh, S. P.; Bakale,
R. P. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 505, and references therein.
2,4-di-Cl
4-NMe2
4-t-Bu
4-Et
9
>50:1d
>50:1d
3.7:1
10
11
12
6j
6k
6l
4-Me-O
>50:1d
(8) See Supporting Information for details.
a All reactions were carried out with 10 mmol of 4 and 15 mmol of 5
in 30 mL of DMF. b Isolated yield. c Determined by 1H NMR. d Estimated
on the basis of the detection limit of proton NMR.
(9) (a) Coleman, R. S.; Liu, P.-H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 577. (b) Jiang, L.;
Job, G. E.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3667. (c) Shen,
R.; Porco, J.A., Jr Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1333. (d) Ogawa, T.; Kiji, T.; Hayami,
K.; Suzuki, H. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1443.
3034
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 14, 2008