C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 3. Acylation of Aryl Bromides (1b-m) with 2d,i-ka
point and self-condensation, a low yield was obtained with
propionaldehyde (entry 1).
We next extended the acylation to a series of aryl bromides
(1b-m) coupling with hexanal (2d) and the functionalized alde-
hydes 2i-k. As summarized in Table 3, the reactions afforded
moderate to excellent yields of ketones 3. As may be expected,10c
ortho substitution on the arene ring decreases the yield (entry 2).
It appears that aryl bromides with electron-withdrawing or very
electron-donating groups also tend to furnish lower yields. Good
results were again obtained when using the aldehydes 2i-k (entries
13-15). We also examined the acylation of 2-bromothiophene
(1m); a moderate yield was recorded (entry 12).
The hypothesis in Scheme 1 implies that, in the case of an
enamine, the overall acylation can be catalytic in the amine since
it should be regenerated following hydrolysis of the Heck coupling
product. To further probe the mechanism, we then studied the
acylation of 1a with 2f by using 20 mol % of pyrrolidine and 1
equiv of K2CO3 as base under otherwise identical conditions to
those above. 3f was obtained in 85% isolated yield.15 This compares
well with the result in Table 2, suggesting that pyrrolidine indeed
acts as a catalyst, presumably converting the aldehyde into a highly
reactive electron-rich olefin for palladium to seize and as a base
under the conditions of Tables 2 and 3 to neutralize the HBr released
from the Heck reaction, as hypothesized in Scheme 1. It is
interesting to note that, under similar conditions but without
pyrrolidine and 4Å MS added, the coupling reaction of aldehydes
with aryl bromides led to R-arylated aldehydes instead of ketones,
as shown by Hartwig very recently.16
In summary, we have developed an efficient protocol for the
direct acylation of aryl bromides with various aldehydes, obtaining
alkyl aryl ketones in moderate to excellent yields. The reaction
appears to involve cocatalysis of palladium and amine. Studies into
the mechanism and further application of the reaction will be the
focus of future work.
Acknowledgment. We thank the EPSRC (EP/F000316) for
support.
a The conditions were the same as in Table 2. b Isolated yields.
c Only one bromo group reacted.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
analytic data (NMR, IR, MS, and elemental analysis). This material is
of a base, using Pd(dba)2-phosphine as catalyst precursor. The
results are summarized in Table 1. The desired ketone 3f was not
obtained with inorganic bases (entries 1-3), and changing the base
to Et3N led to only a small amount of 3f being formed (entry 4).
We then turned attention to secondary amines, which are prone to
forming enamines with the aldehyde.13 To our delight, an encour-
aging result was obtained when pyrrolidine was used (entry 6). We
then tested a range of other additives under various conditions. The
results show that the combination of pyrrolidine and 4Å MS affords
the best yield of ketone 3f (entry 7). No reaction occurred using
4Å MS alone, and lower yields resulted with other amines (entries
8-12). While ligands show insignificant effects on the acylation
(entries 13-15), solvents impact dramatically on the reaction
(entries 16 and 17).
References
(1) (a) Franck, H. G.; Stadelhofer, J. W. Industrial Aromatic Chemistry;
Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988. (b) Surburg, H.; Panten, J. Common
Fragrance and FlaVor Materials, 5th ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2006.
(2) Olah, G. A. Friedel-Crafts Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1973.
(3) Park, Y. J.; Park, J.-W.; Jun, C.-H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 222.
(4) Satoh, T.; Itaya, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. Chem. Lett. 1996, 823.
(5) Huang, Y.-C.; Majumdar, K. K.; Cheng, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
1682.
(6) Ko, S.; Kang, B.; Chang, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 455.
(7) Pucheault, M.; Darses, S.; Genet, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15356.
(8) Ishiyama, T.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12043.
(9) Takemiya, A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14800.
(10) (a) Hyder, Z.; Ruan, J.; Xiao, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 5555. (b) Mo,
J.; Xiao, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4152. (c) Mo, J.; Xu, L.;
Xiao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 751.
(11) Nilsson, P.; Larhed, M.; Hallberg, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8217.
(12) Cabri, W.; Candiani, I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 2.
(13) Recent reviews of enamine catalysis: (a) Mukherjee, S.; Yang, J. W.;
Hoffmann, S.; List, B. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5471. (b) Notz, W.; Tanaka,
F.; Barbas, C. F., III Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 580.
(14) Review of antidepressants Fluoxetine and its analogues: Wong, D. T.; Perry,
K. W.; Bymaster, F. P. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2005, 4, 764.
(15) Under the same conditions but in 10 h reaction time, 3k, 3l, 3t, and 3u
were obtained in 75, 78, 75, and 79% isolated yield, respectively.
(16) Vo, G. D.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2127.
Having established the optimized conditions, we then tested the
acylation of 1a with various aldehydes 2a-k. The results are shown
in Table 2. As can be seen, the reactions afforded good to excellent
yields of ketones 3. In particular, very good results were obtained
for the functionalized aldehydes 2j,k (entries 10 and 11), providing
a better way for preparing functionalized alkyl aryl ketones,
synthetically useful intermediates for pharmaceutical compounds,
such as Fluoxetine and analogues.14 However, due to the low boiling
JA804351Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 32, 2008 10511