K. Teste et al. / Carbohydrate Research 343 (2008) 1490–1495
1491
elucidated by NMR analysis (1H, 13C, HMQC, and
HMBC). O- and N-Alkylation were demonstrated firstly
by long-range coupling observed in HMBC experiments
between C-30/H-30 and H-a/C-a and between H-a and
C-2/C-4 (Tables 1 and 2) and secondly by the disappear-
ance of the OH and NH groups, respectively. In addi-
tion, the 1H NMR spectra in DMSO-d6 displayed
signals of the NH and OH hydrogens of compounds 1
and 2, respectively (Fig. 1).
Table 1. NMR data of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (400 MHz for 1H,
100 MHz for 13C)
1
Position
dC
83.9
dH (mult; J in Hz)
HMBC
Figure 1. Comparison of H NMR spectra of compounds 1 (top) and
2.
10
20
6.12 (dd; 8.5, 5.8)
2.10 (ddd; 13.7, 8.5, 6.0)
2.26 (ddd; 13.7, 5.8, 1.8)
4.07 (m)
C-2, 30, 6
C-10, 30, 40
C-10, 30, 40
C-10, 40, 50, a
C-30, 50
C-30, 40
C-30, 40
C-a, c
36.3
30
40
50
78.6
84.1
63.3
The allylation reaction was also carried out in diox-
ane, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and dimethyl
sulfoxide for comparison. In every case, the reaction was
checked by TLC and stopped when there was no more
production of product.
3.98 (m)
3.74 (dd; 11.3, 3.9)
3.78 (dd; 11.3, 4.1)
0.08 (s)
a
ꢀ5.5
0.09 (s)
C-a, c
In view of these results, it seems that regioselectivity
and dielectric constant of solvents are closely linked. In-
deed for solvents whose dielectric constant is lower than
10, the O-alkylated product is exclusively obtained, even
in the presence of excess sodium hydride and allyl
bromide (Table 3). Quasi-stoichiometric conditions
(1.2 equiv) lead to a dramatic decrease in yield. How-
ever, in the case of higher dielectric constant (DMSO,
DMF) and in presence of 1.2 equiv of each reagent, only
N-alkylation is observed. An excess of both base and
bromide results in the formation of dialkylated thym-
idine. Finally, a slow alkylation was observed in dichlo-
roethane, with selective formation of the O-alkylated
product.
b
c
2
NH
4
5
6
d
a
25.7
18.0
150.4
—
163.6
109.5
135.4
12.2
0.89 br s
—
—
C-b, c
—
—
C-2, 4
—
—
C-10, 2, 4, 5, d
C-4, 5, 6
C-30, b, c
C-a
C-a, b
C-a, b
11.36 (br s)
—
—
7.49 (d; 0.7)
1.78 (br s)
4.01 (d; 5.3)
5.90 (ddd; 17.1, 10.4, 5.3)
5.17 (dd; 10.4, 1.6)
5.28 (dd; 17.1, 1.6)
69.1
134.9
116.6
b
c
Table 2. NMR data of compound 2 in DMSO-d6 (400 MHz for 1H,
100 MHz for 13C)
Microwave irradiation was then used to establish a
comparison with ultrasound. Indeed the microwave acti-
vation presents some advantages, such as a remarkable
decrease in reaction times and in some cases, cleaner
reactions and a good selectivity.4
Position
dC
84.9
dH (mult, J in Hz)
HMBC
10
20
6.20 (dd; 7.5, 6.3)
2.08 (ddd; 13.3, 7.5, 6.0)
2.15 (ddd; 13.3, 6.3, 3.1)
4.21 (m)
C-2, 30, 6
C-10, 30, 40
C-10, 30, 40
C-10
39.6
30
70.3
—
86.9
63.1
In a typical procedure, a solution of TBDMS-thymi-
dine with sodium hydride (1.2 equiv) in aprotic solvent
was irradiated for 2 min, then allyl bromide (1.2 equiv)
was added, and the mixture was irradiated again for
4 min (Table 4, entry 2) or for 6 min (Table 4, entry
1). In THF compound 1 was obtained in 99% yield
(Table 4, entry 1), although in DMF compound 2 was
obtained in 96% yield (Table 4, entry 2). We observed
the same regioselectivity using either microwave irradia-
tion or ultrasound activation. In order to evaluate to
what extent this method can be generalized, we tested
different alkyl bromides. The results, summarized in
Table 4, show that this methodology permits one to
selectively protect in high yields either the 3 or 30-posi-
tion of thymidine (entries 5–8) with whichever alkyl
OH
40
50
5.31 (br s)
—
3.84 (br dd; 6.3, 3.2)
3.73 (dd; 11.3, 3.7)
3.80 (dd; 11.3, 3.1)
0.07 (s)
0.08 (s)
0.88 (br s)
—
—
—
—
7.56 (d; 1.0)
1.83 (d; 0.7)
4.40 (br d; 5.4)
5.81 (ddd; 17.2, 10.5, 5.4)
5.05 (dd; 17.2, 1.5)
5.09 (dd; 10.5, 1.5)
C-30, 50
C-30, 40
C-30, 40
C-a, c
C-a, c
C-b, c
—
a
ꢀ5.5
b
c
25.7
17.9
2
4
5
6
d
a
b
c
150.0
162.2
108.4
134.2
12.8
42.4
132.3
116.5
—
—
—
C-10, 2, 4, 5, d
C-4, 5, 6
C-2, 4, b, c
C-a
C-a, b
C-a, b