the reaction. Such ligand-modulated selectivity would
provide opportunities for accessing different isomeric pro-
ducts by simply changing the catalyst structure.2 Herein we
report the realization of this strategy in the development of
pyridine-based ligands that impart sterically controlled
selectivity10,11 in Pd-catalyzed CÀH acetoxylation.
Table 1. Effect of Pyridine Ligands on Site Selectivity and Yield
for the CÀH Acetoxylation of 1,2-Dichlorobenzenea
Our initial studies probed the effect of a series of
pyridine-based ligands on the selectivity of the CÀH ac-
etoxylation of 1,2-dichlorobenzene (1) with MesI(OAc)2.12
Pyridine and its derivatives are highly attractive ligands for
this chemistry, because: (1) they are generally not suscep-
tible to oxidation by hypervalent iodine reagents, (2) they
are known to increase the rate of CÀH acetoxylation,7b
and (3) they possess highly modular structures. The test
substrate 1 was selected because it has two inequivalent
arene CÀH bonds that are electronically similar, but
sterically dissimilar.6 Furthermore, electron-deficient
arenes such as 1 are traditionally difficult to functionalize
via Pd-catalyzed CÀH acetoxylation.5,7b,13
yield
(%)
selectivity
entry
ligand
none
(1A:1B)
1
2
19
28
76
84
82
77
55
71
59
78
29:71
27:73
11:89
8:82
7:93
7:93
6:94
6:94
6:94
5:95
In the absence of added ligand, the Pd(OAc)2-catalyzed
reaction of 1 with MesI(OAc)2 proceeded in low yield
(19%) after 16h at 100 °C (Table 1, entry 1). Acetoxylation
at the less sterically hindered 4-position was weakly pre-
ferred under these ligand-free conditions (1A:1B = 29:71).
A similar yield and selectivity wereobtainedinthe presence
of 2 mol % of 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (entry 2), suggest-
ing that the very sterically hindered nitrogen atom does not
bind to the Pd center. In contrast, other pyridine derivatives,
including lutidine, picoline, quinoline, 3-fluoropyridine,
2-methylquinoline, pyridine, 4-methoxypyridine, and acri-
dine (entries 3À10), all afforded large increases in yield
and enhancements in selectivity for acetoxylation at the
sterically less hindered 4-position.14 Under these conditions,
the best selectivity was obtained with acridine as the ligand
(1A:1B = 5:95, entry 8).15
We next evaluated the influence of the acridine:Pd
ratio on the reaction yield and site selectivity. As shown
in Table 2, the addition of up to 6 mol % of acridine
(3 equiv relative to Pd) led to further enhancements in
selectivity (1A:1B = 2:98) with minimal deleterious effect
on the overall reaction yield (entry 4). Further increases in
acridine loading resulted in even better selectivity (>1:99
at 20 mol % acridine, entry 7); however, the product yield
was significantly lower under these conditions. Notably,
2,6-tBu2-py
2,6-lutidine
2-picoline
quinoline
2-Me-quinoline
3-F-py
3
4
5
6
7
8
pyridine
9
4-OMe-py
acridine
10
a Yield and selectivity were determined by GC using a calibration
curve based on PhCl as a standard.
the results with acridine stand in striking contrast to the
effects observed upon increasing the loading of pyridine.
As shown in entries 8À11 (Table 2), increasing the pyridine
loading to 6 mol % led to a precipitous drop-off in yield.
Overall, an acridine:Pd ratio of 3:1 provided the best
balance of yield and selectivity and was thus used in all
further experiments exploring the substrate scope.
Further studies revealed that the site selectivity of
Pd(OAc)2/acridine catalyzed CÀH acetoxylation is sub-
stantially influenced by the nature of the oxidant.7b,12 For
instance, a significant erosion in selectivity is observed
when MesI(OAc)2 is replaced with PhI(OAc)2. With 2 mol
% of acridine and 2 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, the 1A:1B ratio
was 5:95 with MesI(OAc)2 and 19:81 with PhI(OAc)2
as the oxidant. These results implicate a synergistic effect
between the hypervalent iodine oxidant and the ligand.16
We next optimized the catalyst loading using tri-
fluorotoluene (2). This was selected because it is a challen-
ging substrate that typically shows low reactivity in Pd-
catalyzed CÀH oxidations.7b,8,9 Thus, we anticipated that
the trends observed in this system should be transferrable
to a wide variety of other substrates. Varying the catalyst
loading from 6 to 0.2 mol % Pd(OAc)2 while keeping the
(10) For a recent example of Pd-catalyzed CÀH amination where
selectivity is dictated by substrate sterics, see: Shrestha, R.; Mukherjee,
P.; Tan, Y.; Litman, Z. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
8480.
(11) For a review on sterically controlled selectivity in CÀH boryla-
tion reactions, see: Mkhalid, I. A. I.; Barnard, J. H.; Marder, T. B.;
Murphy, J. M.; Hartwig, J. F. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 890.
(12) For preliminary studies of the influence of MesI(OAc)2 [versus
PhI(OAc)2] on the site selectivity of CÀH aectoxyation with the
Pd(OAc)2/pyridine catalyst system, see ref 7b.
(13) Emmert, M. H.; Gary, J. B.; Villalobos, J. M.; Sanford, M. S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5884.
(14) Pyridine, 4-methoxypyridine, and 3-fluoropyridine afforded
identical selectivity, suggesting that there is minimal ligand electronic
effect on this reaction.
(15) A recent report by Hartwig and co-workers demonstrated
sterically controlled selectivity in Pd-catalyzed CÀH aminations of
simple arenes (see ref 10). However, the supporting ligand had no effect
on the site selectivity of the reaction in this system.
(16) Similar effects were seen with pyridine as the ligand. For
example, with 2 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and 2 mol % pyridine, the selectivity
(1A:1B) using substrate 1 was 19:81 with PhI(OAc)2 and 6:94 with
MesI(OAc)2. See Supporting Information Table S1B for more details.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 21, 2013
5429