Scheme 2. Cyclopropanation/Cyclopropanol Ring Opening
Figure 2. Target cyclitol sugar phosphates.
We targeted the synthesis of both enantiomers of three
R-sugars and one ꢀ-sugar. These structures are outlined in
Figure 2: 2,3-dideoxy-4-oxo-5a-carba-R-D-rhamnopyanose phos-
phate (3), 2,3-dideoxy-5a-carba-R-D-rhamnopyranose phosphate
(4), 5a-carba-R-D-rhamnopyranose phosphate (5), 5a-carba-ꢀ-
D-digitoxopyranose phosphate (6), and 5a-carba-R-L-rhamnopy-
ranose phosphate (ent-5). Retrosynthetically, we envisioned that
the desired carbasugar phosphate stereoisomers 7 could be
synthesized from both enantiomers of the cis- and trans-
diastereomers of the enone γ-phosphate 8. We thought 8 could
be derived through a ꢀ-elimination and phosphorylation from
acetonide 9 (Scheme 1). The critical methyl group could be
introduced by R-alkylation either through in situ generated
enolate or silylenol ether from enone 10 with the acetonide-
protecting group controlling the stereochemistry. The known
intermediate 10 could be easily synthesized from cheap starting
material D-(-)-quinic acid by known methods.8
Alternatively, we envisioned a cyclopropanation and ring-
opening process which could lead to the formation of R-methyl
ketone.12 Thus, one-pot of hydrosilylation of enone 10 (RhCl(P-
Ph3)3/PhMe2SiH, 60 °C) followed by Simmons-Smith cyclo-
propanation (ZnEt2/CH2I2) of the resulting silylenol ether gave
an inseparable mixture of cyclopropanol silyl ethers,13 which
when desilylated under acidic conditions (p-TsOH/MeOH) fur-
nished two readily separable diastereoisomers 13a and 13b in
83% overall yield (Scheme 2). The diastereomeric ratio of
cyclopropanes 13a to 13b rangedfrom 1:1 when the cyclopropa-
nation was performed at low temperature (-20 °C) to 2:1 at 0 °C.
We next investigated the subsequent ring opening of the
cyclopropanol 13a. Unfortunately, all of our attempts to promote
ring opening under acidic or basic conditions failed to give the
desired ketone 9.14 In contrast, the stochiometric Pd(OAc)2-
promoted ring opening of the cyclopropanol gave an R,ꢀ-
unsaturated ketone,15 which under hydrogenation conditions
resulted in an inseparable diastereomeric mixture of R-methyl
ketone 9 (dr 3:1 9a/9b). We wondered if the palladium
homoenolate intermediate could be trapped with hydrogen
before ꢀ-hydride elimination occurred. Because we found that
Pd/C also gave the same enone product, we decided to explore
typical hydrogenolysis conditions.16
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
Our syntheses commenced with the known four-step conver-
sion of D-(-)-quinic acid 11 to the R,ꢀ-unsaturated ketone 10,
which was routinely accomplished on 20 g scale in 60% overall
yield (Scheme 2). Application of the Tsuda-Saegusa 1,4-
reduction/alkylation via the aluminum enolate with methyl
iodide failed to cleanly give the desired R-methyl ketone 9.9
Similarly, the 1,4-hydrosilyation using Stryker’s reagent and
dimethylphenylsilane to form silylenol ether 12 was problem-
atic.10 Fortunately, the hydrosilylation occurred smoothly at 60
°C when Wilkinson’s catalyst and dimethylphenyl silane were
used.11 Unfortunately, various attempts to alkylate the silylenol
ether with methyl iodide via its enolate failed to cleanly provide
the R-methyl ketone 9.
(10) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Chrisman, W.; Noson, K.; Papa, P.; Sclafani,
J. A.; Vivian, R. W.; Keith, J. M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2779–2788. (b)
Mahoney, W. S.; Stryker, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8818–8823.
(11) (a) Ojima, I.; Kogure, T. Organometallics 1982, 1, 1390–1399. (b)
Tojo, S.; Isobe, M. Synthesis 2005, 8, 1237–1244.
(7) Ko, K.-S.; Zea, C. J.; Pohl, N. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
13188–13189.
(12) Kulinkovich, O. G. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2597–2632.
(8) (a) Federspiel, M.; Fischer, R.; Hennig, M.; Mair, H.-J.; Oberhauser,
T.; Rimmler, G.; Albiez, T.; Bruhin, J.; Estermann, H.; Gandert, C.; Gockel,
V.; Gotzo, S.; Hoffmann, U.; Huber, G.; Janatsch, G.; Lauper, S.; Rockel-
Stabler, O.; Trussardi, R.; Zwahlen, A. G. Org. Process Res. DeV. 1999, 3,
266–274. (b) Trost, B. M.; Romero, A. G. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2332–
2342. (c) Audia, J. E.; Boisvert, L.; Patten, A. D.; Villalobos, A.;
Danishefsky, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3738–3740.
(9) Tsuda, T.; Satomi, H.; Hayashi, T.; Saegusa, T. J. Org. Chem. 1987,
52, 439–443.
(13) For a review on Simmons-Smith cyclopropanation, see: (a)
Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1307. (b)
Lautens, M.; Klute, W.; Tam, W. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 49. (c) Lebel, H.;
Marcoux, J.-F.; Molinaro, C.; Charette, A. B. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 977.
(14) For acid-catalyzed opening, see: (a) Schreiber, S. L.; Smith, D. B.;
Schulte, G. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5994–5996. (b) Paquette, L. A.; Ross,
R. J.; Shi, Y. J. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1589–1598, and ref 12. For base-
catalyzed opening, see: (c) Barnier, J. P.; Blanco, L.; Rousseau, G.; Guibe-
Jampel, E.; Fresse, I. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1570–1574.
3382
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 16, 2008