Scheme 5. Synthesis of Subunit 2 through Coupling Reactions of Three Fragments, 7, 8, and 3
chiral centers and following protection of the resulting diol
moiety gave 17 in 57% yield for the two steps as a single
isomer. After deprotection of the TBDPS group of 17 and
bromination of the resulting hydroxy group, fragment 3 was
obtained (93% yield for the two steps).
Fragment 7 possessing two chiral centers was prepared
from L-glutamic acid (9) as shown in Scheme 3. Known
compound 18 was prepared from 9 through a three-step
sequence according to the literature procedure.9 Stereose-
lective methylation of 18 with LDA and iodomethane gave
19 in 95% yield (dr ) 10:1).10 The reduction of 19 to afford
the known diol 2011 and both hydroxyl groups of 20 were
converted to allyl ethers to obtain compound 21 (98% yield
for the two steps). Deprotection of the trityl group of 21,
followed by oxidation of the hydroxyl group, gave fragment
7 (73% yield for the two steps).
with a borane-dimethylsulfide complex, protection of the
hydroxyl group, and reduction of the isopropyl ester with
DIBAL-H gave 23 (64% for the three steps). The hydroxyl
group of 23 was tosylated, and the following introduction
of the acetylene unit by the addition of the lithium
acetylide-ethylenediamine complex gave 24 in 72% yield
over the two steps. Introduction of the methyl group to
terminal alkyne (92%) and site- and stereoselective iodination
of 25 using a Schwartz reagent and iodine produced fragment
8 in 80% yield.
Fragment 4 was synthesized through the coupling reaction
of fragments 7 with 8 (Scheme 5). The addition reaction of
a vinyllithium derivative, which was prepared from 8 by
treatment with an s-BuLi, with aldehyde 7 proceeded to give
26 in 77% yield as a diastereomeric mixture (1:1). Although
the addition reaction of the analogues of fragment 7 having
other protecting groups (MPM or MOM) was examined, the
diastereoselectivity of the reaction did not improve. At this
stage, separation of the diastereomer was not successful.
Therefore, 26 was converted to 28 as a diastereomeric
mixture. Deprotection of allyl groups of 26 using a reaction
The synthesis of fragment 8 is shown in Scheme 4.
Compound 22 was prepared from 3-methylglutaric anhydride
(10) by enantioselective alcoholysis using lipase PS with
n-PrOH according to the literature procedure (98% yield,
92% ee).12 Reduction of the carboxylic acid moiety of 22
(6) Nicolaou, K. C.; Patron, A. P.; Ajito, K.; Richter, P. K.; Khatuya,
H.; Bertinato, P.; Miller, R. A.; Tomaszewski, M. J. Chem.-Eur. J. 1996,
2, 847.
(7) (a) Ohira, S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 561. (b) Mu¨ller, S.; Liepold,
B.; Roth, G. J.; Bestmann, H. J. Synlett 1996, 521.
(8) (a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979,
866. (b) Miyaura, N.; Yamada, K.; Suzuki, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20,
3437. (c) Miyaura, N.; Yanagi, T.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11,
513.
(9) (a) Takano, S.; Yonaga, M.; Chiba, K.; Ogasawara, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1980, 21, 3697. (b) Takano, S.; Yonaga, M.; Ogasawara, K. Synthesis
1981, 265.
(10) Tomioka, K.; Cho, Y.-S.; Sato, F.; Koga, K. Chem. Lett. 1981,
1621.
(11) Kigoshi, H.; Suenaga, K.; Mutou, T.; Ishigaki, T.; Atsumi, T.;
Ishiwata, H.; Sakakura, A.; Ogawa, T.; Ojika, M.; Yamada, K. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 5326.
Figure 1. NOE correlations of the spiroketal moiety of 2.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 17, 2008
3875