4696
B. C. Das, G. W. Kabalka / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 4695–4696
OH
phenyl ring, B could act as RAMBA itself. During our investigation,
we discovered an unusual reaction which produced 6, in Scheme 1.
The proposed synthesis of B involved straightforward reactions
but, unexpectedly, generated 6 rather than B. The structure of 6
was confirmed by the NMR (1H, 13C, NOE) experiments and HRMS.
From 1H NMR d 2.19 (q, 2H) and 13C d 22.3 is the characteristic
peak for methylene peak at 4-position of cyclohexene ring system.
NOE experiment clearly indicates phenyl ring at trans position.
Compound 6 (1H–1H NOes: 6.46 ppm?7.38 ppm-4%, 6.46 ppm?
1.85 ppm-18%, 7.39 ppm?7.90 ppm-7%, 7.39 ppm >6.46 ppm-4%,
7.39 ppm ? 2.55 ppm À1%.
PPh3.HBr
CH3OH
CHO
CH3MgBr
1. n-BuLi, hexane, ether
THF, 2 h, 72%
2. OHC
85%
CO2CH3
rt, 72 h, 78%
+
(1)
PPh3
(3)
(2)
(4)
NaOH (aq)
CH3CH2OH
87%
H
H
O
HO
(5)
O
(6)
O
Scheme 2.
The synthesis of 6 involves the reaction with methyl magne-
sium bromide with b-cyclocitral in THF to give alcohol 2 as a yel-
low oil (Scheme 2).11 The alcohol gave satisfactory spectral data
and was directly converted to 3 by treatment with triphenylphos-
phine hydrobromide in methanol. Recrystallization of 3 from
methanol/ether (1:6) gave a yellow crystalline solid.12 Formation
of the Wittig reagent from 3 in ether was accomplished with n-
butyllithium in hexane at room temperature (dark-red color), then
the Wittig reagent was treated with methyl 4-formylbenzoate 4 in
ether at À78 °C for 10–15 min and then stirred at room tempera-
ture under a nitrogen atmosphere for 30 h. After work up, crude es-
ter 5 was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate: 98/2) to give a brown oil in 85% yield.13 The ester was
saponified to generate a white solid which was filtered, washed
with water, and dried. The product was recrystallized from hot eth-
anol and washed with dry hexane to give acid 6 as white crystals
(87%) yield.14 The structure was confirmed by 1H, 13C NMR and
NOE experiment, HMBC, and HRMS.
Acknowledgments
The author B.C.D. is thankful to AECOM for start up funding
Sean Cahill for NMR experiments. The instrumentation in the AE-
COM Structural NMR Resource is supported by the Albert Einstein
College of Medicine and in part by Grants from the NSF
(DBI9601607 and DBI0331934), the NIH (RR017998) and the HHMI
Research Resources for Biomedical Sciences.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (1H, 13C NMR, NOE and HRMS) associated
with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References and notes
Although a detailed study has not yet been completed, the for-
mation of 6 could arise as outlined in the following scheme.
1. Chambon, P. FASEB 1996, 10, 940–954.
2. (a) Miller, W. H., Jr. Cancer 1998, 83, 1471–1482; (b) Altucci, L.; Gronemeyer, H.
Nat. Rev. Cancer 2001, 1, 181–193; (c) Fontana, J. A.; Rishi, A. K. Leukemia 2002,
16, 463–472; (d) Kuijpers, A. L.; Van Pelt, P. T.; Bergers, M.; Boegheim, P. J.; Den
Bakker, J. E.; Siegenthaler, G.; Van der Kerkhof, P. C.; Schalkwijk, J. Br. J.
Dermatol. 1998, 139, 380–389; (e) Thacher, S. M.; Vasudenvan, J.; Tsang, K.-Y.;
Nagpal, S.; Chandraratna, R. A. S. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 287–296.
3. (a) Lanitzki, I.; Goodman, D. S. Cancer Res. 1974, 34, 1567–1571; (b) Chopra, D.
P.; Wilkoff, L. J. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1977, 58, 923–930; (c) Chytil, F. Pharmacol.
Rev. 1984, 36, 935–1005.
OH
Br
PPh3.HBr
CH3OH
+
(2)
PPh3
(3)
:
PH3
_
:
1. n-BuLi, hexane, ether
H+ shift
4. Degos, L.; Chomienne, C.; Daniel, M. T.; Berger, R.; Dombert, H.; Fenaux, P.;
Castaigne, S. Lancet 1990, 336, 1440–1441.
_
[most likely
5. Warrell, R. P.; Frankel, S. R.; Miller, W. H.; Scheinberg, D. A.; Itri, L. M.;
Hittelman, W. N.; Vyas, R.; Andreeff, M.; Tafuri, A.; Jakubowski, A.; Gabrilove, J.;
Gordon, M. S.; Dmitrovsky, E. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 324, 1385–1393.
6. Hong, W. K.; Itri, L. In The Retinoids: Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine, 2nd ed.;
Sporn, M. B., Roberts, A. B., Goodman, D. S., Eds.; Raven: New York, 1994; pp
923–930.
+
PPh3
intermolecular]
PPh3
+
1. n-BuLi, hexane, ether
NaOH (aq)
7. Trump, D. L.; Smith, D.; Stiff, D.; Adedoyin, A.; Bahnson, R.; Day, R.; Branch, R.
Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 1994, 751, 241.
CH3CH2OH
2. OHC
CO2CH3
O
_
H
(4)
H
8. (a) Mundi, J.; Frankel, S. R.; Miller, W. H., Jr.; Jakubowski, A.; Scheinberg, D. A.;
Young, C. W.; Dmitrovsky, E.; Warrell, R. P., Jr. Blood 1992, 79, 299–303; (b)
Mundi, J.; Frankel, S. R.; Miller, W. H., Jr.; Huselton, C.; Degrazia, F.; Garland, W.
A.; Young, C. W.; Dmitrovsky, E.; Warrell, R. P., Jr. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 2138–
2142.
+
PPh3
HO
(5)
O
(6)
O
9. Boutwell, R. K. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1982, 6, 796–798.
10. Njar, V. C. O. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2002, 2, 261–269.
Compound 2 when treated with triphenyl phosphine hydrogen
bromide in methanol, forms the expected allylic bromide. Nucleo-
philic attack of the triphenylphosphine at the b-carbon of the
allylic bromide results in the formation of 3. Addition of butyllith-
ium results in deprotonation at the carbon adjacent to the phos-
phonium ion. An intermolecular, proton shift then generates the
ylide that reacts in a Wittig reaction to generate the observed prod-
uct, 5. Saponification and acidification then generates 6.
In summary, we report here the synthesis of a novel analogue of
ATRA generated by replacing the acyclic alkene backbone with a
phenyl ring. The biological activity of 6 and its derivatives is cur-
rently underway and will submitted for publication in the near
future. The formation of 6 involved an unusual triphenylphospine
substitution reaction which may comprise a new method for con-
verting allylic tertiary alcohols to dienes. The generality of the new
reaction is currently being investigated.
11. Ferna’ndez-Mateos, A.; Mateos Buro’n, L.; Martı’n de la Nava, E. M.; Rubio
Gonza’ lez, R. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3585–3592.
12. Rosenberger, M.; Neukom, C. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1782–1785.
13. Waugh, K. M.; Berlin, K. D.; Ford, W. T.; Halt, E. M.; Carrol, J. P.; Schomber, P. R.;
Thompson, M. D.; Schiffl, L. J. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 116–124.
14.
A detailed experimental procedure follows: Compound (6)—ester 5 (1.08 g,
3.61 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (17 mL), while maintaining at a N2
atmosphere. An aqueous solution of NaOH (0.83 g, 21 mmol in 36 mL H2O) was
added. The reaction mixture was heated at reflux under N2 for 5 h during
which, the mixture became a clear yellow solution. After cooling to near room
temperature, the solution was acidified with concentrated aqueous HCl. A
white solid formed and was filtered, washed with water. The solid was dried
and recrystallized from hot ethanol. After washing with dry hexane, 6 was
obtained as white crystals (0.89 g, 87%), mp 187 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-
d6): d 13.0–12.6 (br s, 1H), 7.90–7.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H),
6.47 (s, 1H), 2.55 (m, 2H), 2.19 (q, 2H), 1.86 (s, 3H), 1.44 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 6H)
and 1.03 (t, J = 8 Hz, 3H) 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 148.1, 142.8, 141.2,
129.03, 127.8, 126.6, 120.5, 67.1, 38.1, 35.4, 27.3, 23.7, 22.3 and 14.6. HR FT-ICR
MS: calcd for C19H24O2 ([M+H]+) 285.1848; found: 285.1856.