Scheme 1. Regio- and Stereoselective Synthesis of Yellow Scale Pheromone
in 1979.3a In the same year, the active isomer of 1 was shown
to be the 5E isomer by a deliberate synthesis of a mixture
of the 5E and 5Z isomers by Anderson and Henrick.3b Mori
and his co-workers subsequently established the 3S config-
uration of the active isomer through asymmetric syntheses
of both enantiomers.3d,e Although highly stereoselective, their
syntheses based on the chiral pool protocol suffered from a
lengthy sequence of over 10 steps from methyl (R)-(+)-
citronellate in 7-10% overall yields. A very promising,
convergent, but nonasymmetric route to 1 via silylcupration4
was devised more recently by Millar.3f
The synthetically challenging trisubstituted alkene moiety
of 1 and an opportunity for applying the ZACA reaction (Zr-
catalyzed asymmetric carboalumination of alkenes),5 espe-
cially one-pot synthesis of (2S)-4-tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy-
2-methyl-1-butanol (2) of 98% ee in 52% yield from TBDPS-
protected 3-buten-1-ol,5d prompted us to devise an efficient
and regio- and stereoselective synthesis of 1, as outlined in
Scheme 1.
For construction of the trisubstituted alkene moiety, applica-
tion of alkyne haloboration developed by Suzuki7 was consid-
ered, and stereoselective formation of 3 in ca. 80% yield by
the reaction of 3-methyl-1-butyne with BBr3 in CH2Cl2 was
observed. This was to be followed by selective and high-yielding
cross-coupling. The high propensity of the bromoboration
products, such as 3, to undergo unwanted dehaloboration
together with the modest reactivity of hindered alkenyl bromide
would make desired C-C bond formation via cross-coupling
of 3 challenging. In fact, the only known satisfactory cross-
coupling appeared to be the Pd-catalyzed organozinc reaction2
employed by Suzuki.7 It then occurred to us that, whereas the
Pd-catalyzed alkenylmetal-allyl electrophile (alkenyl-allyl,
hereafter) coupling had been extensively investigated, generally
high-yielding, and often highly regio- and stereospecific with
retention with respect to both alkenyl and allyl groups,8 little
had been known about the corresponding allylmetal-alkenyl
electrophile (allyl-alkenyl, hereafter) coupling.8b Since the Pd-
catalyzed alkenyl-allyl coupling was not a viable option for
the task at hand, however, the Pd-catalyzed allyl-alkenyl
coupling of (Z)-(2-bromo-1-octenyl)dibromoborane, generated
by treating 1-octyne with BBr3 in CH2Cl2, with allylzinc
bromide and its variously carbon-substituted derivatives gener-
ated by treating the corresponding allylic bromides with Zn dust
was examined.9 The results summarized in Table 1 indicate
the following: (1) The Pd-catalyzed allyl-alkenyl coupling with
the parent allylzinc bromide does not occur under the conditions
used, but all of the other cases including those involving
2-methylallylzinc bromide gave the desired products in good
yields. The sterically least demanding parent allylzinc bromide
may act as a catalyst poison, although this point needs to be
further investigated. (2) As anticipated, the Pd-catalyzed
allyl-alkenyl coupling is more readily prone to stereoisomer-
ization. Thus, the allylic organozinc reagents derived from both
geranyl and neryl bromides led to the formation of essentially
identical mixtures of the 4E and 4Z isomers (E/Z ) 2.5/1)
without producing detectable amounts of regioisomers. These
results are in sharp contrast with the corresponding Pd-catalyzed
alkenyl-allyl coupling proceeding with essentially complete
retention of both stereo- and regiochemical identities.8 Despite
these limitations, the desired case of the conversion of 3 to 4
via Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of 3 with 3-methyl-2-butenylz-
inc bromide in the presence of 1 mol % of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2
followed by iodinolysis with I2 (2 equiv) and NaOAc (1.5 equiv)
proceeded cleanly with no detectable sign of isomerization to
give 4 (g98% E) in 77% yield from 3-methyl-1-butyne.
(4) For a seminal paper on silylcupration, see: Fleming, I.; Newton,
T. W.; Roessler, F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 252, 7–2532.
(5) For seminal and pertinent papers on the ZACA reaction, see: (a)
Kondakov, D.; Negishi, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10771–10772.
(b) Kondakov, D.; Negishi, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1577–1578.
(c) Huo, S.; Shi, J.; Negishi, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2141–
2143. (d) Huang, Z.; Tan, Z.; Novak, T.; Zhu, G.; Negishi, E. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2007, 349, 539–545.
(6) Erker, G.; Aulbach, M.; Knickmeier, M.; Wingbermuhle, D.; Kruger,
C.; Nolte, M.; Werner, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4590.
(7) (a) Satoh, Y.; Serizawa, H.; Miyaura, N.; Hara, S.; Suzuzki, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 1811–1814. (b) For a seminal report on alkyne
haloboration, see: Lappert, M. F.; Prokai, B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1964,
1, 384–400.
(8) (a) Matsushita, H.; Negishi, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2882–
2884. (b) For a review, see: Negishi, E.; Liu, F. Chapter III.2.9 in
ref 2a.
(9) (a) Shriner, R. L.; Neumann, F. W. Organic Synthesis; Wiley: New
York, 1955; Vol. III, p 73. (b) Negishi, E.; Matsushita, H.; Okukado, N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 2715–2718.
4312
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 19, 2008