THF of co-crystallization as seen in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra.
The THF remains in the sample even after prolonged periods of
drying in vacuo. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6): d = 7.74 (s, 1H, para),
7.72 (s, 1H, para), 7.32 (s, 1H, para), 6.61 to 6.47 (7H, ortho and
i-Pr methine), 6.19 (septet, 1H, i-Pr methine), 5.88 (septet, 1H,
i-Pr methine), 2.20 (s, 9H, ArCH3), 2.16 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 2.09 (s,
3H, ArCH3), 2.08 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 1.65 (d, 3H, i-Pr methyl), 1.55
(d, 3H, i-Pr methyl), 1.44 (d, 3H, i-Pr methyl), −0.22 to −0.25
(9H, i-Pr methyl) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6): d = 153.0
(ipso), 152.5 (ipso), 151.9 (ipso), 138.1 (meta), 137.9 (meta), 137.8
(meta), 137.1 (meta), 136.6 (meta), 136.4 (meta), 125.4 (2C, ortho),
125.2 (2C, ortho), 124.5 (2C, ortho), 124.3 (para), 124.2 (para),
124.1 (para), 68.9 (i-Pr methine), 68.1 (i-Pr methine), 66.1 (i-Pr
methine), 23.7 (methyl), 23.4 (methyl), 23.2 (methyl), 23.1 (methyl),
23.0 (methyl), 22.7 (methyl), 22.02 (methyl), 21.95 (methyl), 21.70
(methyl), 21.66 (methyl) ppm. 31P NMR (162 MHz, C6D6): d =
−49.8 (2JWP = 85 Hz) ppm. Anal. calcd for C33H48Cl5N4PW: C,
44.39; H, 5.42; N, 6.27. Calcd for C37H56Cl5N4OPW (1.0 equiv
THF—as seen in the crystal structure): C, 46.05; H, 5.85; N, 5.81.
Found: C, 45.95; H, 5.84; N, 5.72.
Table 2 Total bonding energies for molecules involved in the nitrile
elimination reactions
Molecule
Total energy/kcal mol−1a
CH3CN
CF3CN
CH3C(O)NW(NH2)3Cl
CF3C(O)NW(NH2)3Cl
OW(NH2)3Cl
−837.37
−851.07
−2417.45
−2442.01
−1579.16
a With respect to spherical atomic fragments.
Parallel Quantum Solutions (http://www.pqs-chem.com). All
results reported are with reference to fully optimized geometries
with no imaginary frequencies.20,21
From the above total bonding energies (Table 2) we can compute
DHrxn for the two nitrile elimination reactions as follows:
Synthesis of (Ar[i-Pr]N)3W(Cl)3 (1-(Cl)3). A thawing, red
solution of 1-(O)Cl (794 mg, 1.10 mmol) in Et2O (5 mL) was added
to a thawing suspension of PCl5 (228 mg, 1.10 mmol) in Et2O
(3 mL) resulting in an orange reaction mixture upon addition.
The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature
and was stirred for 0.5 h. A canary yellow solid precipitated
out of solution and was collected on a fritted glass filter. The
solids were washed with pentane (3 × 20 mL) and dried under
vacuum (595 mg, 0.766 mmol, 69.6%). Samples contain ∼1 equiv
of Et2O as evinced by 1H and 13C NMR. The Et2O remains even
after prolonged periods of drying in vacuo. X-Ray quality crystals
of 1-(Cl)3 can be grown from a saturated methylene chloride
solution layered with diethyl ether and stored at −35 ◦C. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, C6D6): d = 7.77 (s, 3H, para), 6.55 (s, 3H, ortho), 6.44 (s
coincident with septet, 6H, ortho and i-Pr methine, respectively),
2.15 (s, 9H, ArCH3), 2.05 (s, 9H, ArCH3), 1.16 (d, 9H, i-Pr methyl),
−0.27 (d, 9H, i-Pr methyl). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6): d = 152.3
(ipso), 138.2 (meta), 136.8 (meta), 124.0 (2C, ortho), 123.9 (para),
68.5 (i-Pr methine), 23.4 (methyl), 22.1 (methyl), 22.0 (methyl),
21.6 (methyl) ppm. Anal. calcd for C33H48Cl3N3W: C, 51.01; H,
6.23; N, 5.41. Calcd for C33.5H49Cl4N3W (0.5 equiv methylene
chloride—as seen in the crystal structure): C, 49.10; H, 6.04; N,
5.13. Found: C, 48.58; H, 6.38; N, 4.32.
Based on calculations with the above model complexes, ex-
trusion of acetonitrile from CH3C(O)NW(NH2)3 is essentially
thermoneutral while formation of trifluoroacetonitrile from the
analogous tungsten complex is significantly uphill.
Conclusions
Synthesis and characterization of 6-coordinate tungsten com-
=
plexes 1-(N PCl3)(Cl)2, 1-(OCN)(Cl)2 and 1-(Cl)3 lends credence
to the proposed intermediate 2. Similar metallacycles have been
proposed both by us22 and others,23 but there had been some doubt
as to whether the tungsten trisanilide platform 1 could adopt a
pseudo-octahedral structure. Additionally, we have discovered a
new mode of reactivity for 1-N and 1-(O)Cl that awaits further
exploitation.
Acknowledgements
For stimulating discussions the authors thank Richard R. Schrock.
We gratefully acknowledge for funding this work the U. S. National
Science Foundation (CHE-0316823).
References
Density functional calculations
1 C. R. Clough, J. B. Greco, J. S. Figueroa, P. L. Diaconescu, W. M. Davis
and C. C. Cummins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 7742–7743.
All calculations were carried out using ADF 2004.01 from
Scientific Computing and Modeling (http://www.scm.com).13,14
In all cases the LDA functional employed was that of Vosko,
Wilk, and Nusair (VWN)15 while the GGA part was handled
using the functionals of Becke and Perdew (BP86).16,17 In addition,
all calculations were carried out using the Zero Order Regular
Approximation (ZORA) for relativistic effects.18,19 In all cases
the basis sets were triple-zeta with two polarization functions
(TZ2P) as supplied with ADF. Frozen core approximations were
utilized according to the following atom types: F, N, C, and O:
1 s frozen; Cl: core frozen through and including 2p; W: core
frozen through and including 4f. Calculations were carried out on
a four- or an eight-processor Quantum Cube workstation from
2 Density functional theory calculations (ADF 2004.01, ZORA TZ2P,
BP86) have been carried out for the nitrile extrusion reaction:
(H2N)3W(NC(O)CR3)Cl → (H2N)3W(O)Cl + CR3CN. For, R = H,
DHrxn= +1 kcal mol−1, while for R = F, DHrxn = +12 kcal mol−1
.
3 R. A. Bailey, S. L. Kozak, T. W. Michelsen and W. N. Mills, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 1971, 6, 407–445.
4 M. Becke-Goehring, Fortschr. Chem. Forsch., 1968, 10, 207–237.
5 C. H. Honeyman, A. J. Lough and I. Manners, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33,
2988–2993.
6 E. Rivard, C. H. Honeyman, A. R. McWilliams, A. J. Lough and I.
Manners, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 1489–1495.
7 I. Schmidt, U. Kynast, J. Hanich and K. Dehnicke, Z. Naturforsch., B:
Anorg. Chem. Org. Chem., 1984, 39, 1248–1251.
8 J. S. Figueroa and C. C. Cummins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
13916–13917.
9 K. R. Seddon and V. H. Thomas, Inorg. Chem., 1978, 17, 749–751.
4462 | Dalton Trans., 2008, 4458–4463
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
©