4626
S.-A. Poulsen et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4624–4627
Table 1
acteristics. Nine of the ten derivatives had micromolar Kis in a com-
pact grouping with a value similar to that of the azido parent 1: Kis
ranged from 2200 to 6500 nM, the Ki of 1 was 3900 nM. The only
outlier in this library was the bis-sulfonamide 17, with two ZBFs
and an inhibition constant an order of magnitude better than for
all other compounds (Ki of 100 nM). This compound can bind to
the hCA active site zinc cation in two possible orientations, the ori-
entation of the triazole moiety being reversed in the two binding
modes. Thus, in the 1,4-diaryl-1,2,3-triazole, the triazole orienta-
tion appears to have a significant impact on hCA I binding that is
worthy of further investigation, and we intend to follow this up
in a future report.
Inhibition data for 1, new sulfonamides 12–21 and standard inhibitors ZNS and TPM
against human isozymes hCA I, II, VA and VB (h = human) 12
O
R
O
S
N
N
N
H2N
Compound
R
Ki (nM)a
CA VAc
CA Ib
CA IIb
CA VBc
ZNS
TPM
1
—
—
—
56
250
3900
35
10
47.0
20
63
56.0
6033
30
55.8
At isozyme hCA II the parent azido scaffold 1 had a Ki of 47 nM.
Seven of the phenyl triazoles (compounds 12, 15–17, 19, 20, 21)
were potent low nanomolar inhibitors of hCA II (Kis ranged from
7.7 to 11.7 nM). Compound 18 (para-fluoro derivative) had a Ki va-
lue similar to that of the azido parent 1 (Kis 40.3 nM), whilst those
for compounds 13 and 14 were in between (Kis 18.6 and 33.8 nM,
respectively). All triazole compounds were selective for hCA II over
hCA I, typically three orders of magnitude (except the bis-sulfon-
amide 17, which is two orders of magnitude selective). These re-
sults demonstrate, as did our earlier work, that the ‘tail’
approach for hCA inhibitors can readily discriminate selectivity be-
tween the physiologically dominant hCA isozymes I and II.9
At the mitochondrial CA isozyme VA the parent azido fragment
1 had a Ki of 56.0 nM. All aryl triazole inhibitors were stronger
inhibitors of hCA VA than ZNS, TPM or 1, with tightly clustered
low nanomolar Kis that ranged from 9.3 to 19.6 nM. The new com-
pounds are typically three orders of magnitude more potent inhib-
itors than that at cytosolic hCA I, and of similar potency for
inhibition of hCA II, with the exception of compounds 14 (meta-
methyl derivative) and 18 (para-fluoro derivative) which were bet-
ter inhibitors of hCA VA than hCA II. At hCA VB the parent azido
scaffold 1 had a Ki of 55.8 nM, equipotent with that at hCA VA.
At this isozyme the aryl triazoles had two distinct inhibition pro-
files—strongest inhibitors were compounds 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 20,
21 (Ki range of 10.5–12.9 nM) and intermediate potency inhibitors
were compounds 14, 16, 19 (Ki range 51.8–54.2 nM). All com-
pounds were much better inhibitors than ZNS (Ki = 6033 nM),
whilst the strongest inhibitors were ꢀ3-fold better inhibitors than
TPM. As hCA VB has a wider tissue distribution this finding may
prove valuable when discriminating the mitochondrial hCA iso-
zymes is desirable.
Typically the chemical nature of the substituent on the aryl tail
moiety had less impact on the CA inhibition constants than did the
position of the substituent (ortho, meta or para). Compounds 12–15
allow the influence of a methyl group substitution to be assessed in
the ortho, meta and para positions of the phenyl tail. Compound 12
(where R = phenyl, that is, no methyl group substitution) has sim-
ilar Kis to the para- (13) and ortho- (15) methyl substituted phenyl
groups whilst the meta analogue (14) is weaker at hCA II, VA and
VB. Similarly, the other meta modified derivative (19) was also in
the weaker hCA VB inhibitor group described above. These Ki pro-
files indicate that meta substitution is in general detrimental to
hCA inhibition whilst ortho and para substitution patterns do not
effect inhibition constants greatly at either hCA II, VA or VB. There
is one exception to this general SAR: the para-methoxy compound
(16) had a weaker Ki at hCA VB than other para substituted
compounds.
12
13
5100
2100
7.9
17.8
12.8
10.6
10.6
18.6
CH3
14
4000
33.8
19.6
54.2
CH3
15
16
17
18
3000
2200
100
7.7
8.4
9.3
10.6
15.1
14.2
11.4
51.8
11.9
11.2
H3C
OCH3
8.1
SO2NH2
4600
40.3
F
F
19
20
6500
5800
5500
10.7
11.7
8.3
19.1
16.9
17.1
52.3
10.5
12.9
CH3
OCH3
H3C
F3C
21
a
Errors in the range of 5–10% of the reported value, from three determinations.
Human (cloned) isozymes, by the CO2 hydration method.
b
c
Human recombinant full length isozyme, by the CO2 hydration method.12
alyzed CO2 hydration assay, which measures the absorbance
change of a pH indicator and so is directly responsive to the endog-
enous CA catalyzed reaction.
ZNS inhibits isozymes I, II and VA with nanomolar Ki values,
whilst it inhibits more weakly isozyme VB (Ki = 6033 nM). TPM
inhibits all isozymes efficiently, with a Ki of 10 nM for isozyme II,
63 nM for isozyme VA and 30 nM for isozyme VB.
The parent azido benzenesulfonamide fragment (1) had similar
good efficacy against hCA II, VA and VB (Kis of 47.0, 56.0 and
55.8 nM, respectively). This azido compound was also a much
weaker inhibitor of hCA I (Ki = 3900 nM). The inhibition profile
for 1 compared to ZNS and TPM demonstrates that the classical
CA pharmacophore (i.e., an Ar–SO2NH2) is effective at targeting
the CA isozymes of interest in development of potential anti-obes-
ity therapies.
In conclusion, an inhibition study of the human cytosolic iso-
zymes CA I and II, and the mitochondrial isozymes CA and VB with
a novel library of benzenesulfonamides generated by click chemis-
try is presented. These compounds were low to mid nanomolar
inhibitors of hCA isozymes II, VA and VB, and weaker micromolar
inhibitors of hCA I. The inhibition profiles for these novel deriva-
tives should prove valuable lead work in the discovery of isozyme
At the physiologically dominant hCA I the variously substituted
phenyl moieties had minimal influence on enzyme inhibition char-