The extraction ability of the ARMS was also estimated by
measuring the amount of Hg2+ adsorbed on the ARMS by ICP,
resulting in 90% of Hg2+ ion being extracted by ARMS. This
result suggests that the ARMS is potentially useful as a stationary
phase for separation of Hg2+ in liquid chromatography. Also, the
adsorption capacity of the ARMS was measured through solid
extraction using solutions of binary metal ions (Hg2+/Fe3+
,
Hg2+/Co2+, Hg2+/Cd2+, Hg2+/Pb2+ and Hg2+/Zn2+) result-
ing in 85.7–90.5% of Hg2+ being adsorbed by ARMS (Fig. 4). In
contrast, other metal ions such as Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+
were extracted into the solid phase at percentages of only
2.5–5.2% in the competition system. These results suggest that
ARMS is a useful adsorbent for the selective separation of Hg2+
over a range of transition and heavy metal ions.
In conclusion, we have fabricated ARMS using a functional
azobenzene-coupled acyclic receptor. The ARMS recognized
and separated Hg2+ with a high degree of selectivity among
heavy metal ions in aqueous solution. Beyond its immediate
applications in environmental cleanup, ARMS provides a
unique opportunity to introduce molecular binding sites and
to rationally design the surface properties of inorganic nano-
materials. We believe the combination of well-defined inor-
ganic nanomaterials and functionalized organic receptors can
play a pivotal role in the development of a new generation of
hierarchical structures and functionalized composites.
This work was supported by Korea Ministry of Environ-
ments as ‘‘The Eco-technopia 21 Project’’ and ’’KOSEF(2008-
01014)’’.
Fig. 3 (A) Solid UV-Vis spectra of ARMS (5.0 mg) in the (a) absence
and (b) the presence of HgCl2 (5.0 equiv.), and (c) after addition of
EDTA (10 mmol, 2 mL). (B) Picture and (C) proposed structure of
ARMS–Hg2+ before and after treatment of EDTA.
the UV-Vis spectra of ARMS with the addition of Hg2+ to
confirm the stoichiometry between 1 attached onto ARMS
and Hg2+ ion. The spectral variation of ARMS in H2O was
observed upon the gradual addition of HgCl2. As a function of
the Hg2+ concentration, a new absorption band centered at
495 nm leading to obvious color change from light yellow to
red was observed. The red-shift from 310 to 495 nm of the
absorption of ARMS is attributed to a strong binding affinity
between the nitrogen atom of 1 attached to ARMS and Hg2+
(Fig. S7, ESIw).10 The stoichiometry for the complex of 1 with
Hg2+ was examined by a Job plot. As shown in Fig. S8,
ESI,wit was found that the 1–Hg2+ complex concentration
approaches a maximum when the molar faction of [1]/[1] +
[Hg2+] is about 0.5, indicating that Hg2+ forms a 1 : 1
complex with 1 attached to ARMS as shown in Fig. 3(C).
Fig. S9, ESI,w shows standard calibration data (Abs. vs.
[Hg2+]) for ARMS. A linear response is observed (between
1.0–10 mM) with a sensitivity of B1.0 mM. This sensitivity is
equivalent to those previously reported for spectrophotometric
sensors anchored to mesoporous aluminosilicates.19 Furthermore,
we examined the pH effect on Hg(II) uptake by measuring
absorbance of ARMS treated with Hg(II) solutions (pH
1.0–12.0). As shown in Fig. S10, ESI,wno significant absorbance
or color changes were observed between pH 2–9, suggesting the
proposed ARMS sensor can be used in this pH range.
Notes and references
1 G. K. Walkup and B. Imperiali, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
3053.
2 A. Miyawaki, J. Llopis, R. Helm, J. M. McCaffery, J. A. Adams,
M. Ikura and R. Y. Tsien, Nature, 1997, 388, 882.
3 M. M. Henary and C. J. Fahrni, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 106, 5210.
4 J. Homola, S. S. Yee and G. Gauglitz, Sens. Actuators, B, 1999, 54,
3.
5 F. Turner, Science, 2000, 290, 1315.
6 P. Chen and C. He, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 728.
7 T. Gunnlaugsson, J. P. Leonard and N. S. Murray, Org. Lett.,
2004, 6, 1557.
8 J. H. Popline, R. P. Swatloski, J. D. Holbrey, S. K. Spear, A.
Metlen, M. Gratzel, M. K. Nazeeruddin and R. D. Rogers, Chem.
¨
Commun., 2007, 2025.
9 J. Wang and X. Qian, Chem. Commun., 2006, 109.
10 S. J. Lee, J.-E. Lee, J. Seo, I. Y. Jeong, S. S. Lee and J. H. Jung,
Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, 17, 3441.
11 S. J. Lee, S. S. Lee, J. Y. Lee and J. H. Jung, Chem. Mater., 2006,
18, 4713.
12 E. Palomares, R. Vilar, A. Green and J. R. Durrant, Adv. Funct.
Mater., 2004, 14, 111.
13 S. O. Obare, R. E. Hollowell and C. J. Murphy, Langmuir, 2002,
18, 10407.
14 T. Balaji, S. A. El-Safty, H. Matsunaga, T. Hanaoka and F.
Mizukami, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 7202.
´ ´
15 E. Palomares, M. V. Martınez-Dıaz, T. Torres and E. Coronado,
Adv. Funct. Mater., 2005, 15, 803.
16 R. Metivier, I. Leray, B. Lebeau and B. Valeur, J. Mater. Chem.,
2005, 15, 2965.
17 M. H. Lee, S. J. Lee, J. H. Jung and J. S. Kim, Tetrahedron, 2007,
63, 12087.
18 S. J. Lee, J. H. Jung, J. Seo, I. Yoon, K.-M. Park, L. F. Lindoy and
S. S. Lee, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 1641.
19 A. B. Descalzo, D. Jimenz, J. E. Haskouri, D. Beltran, P. Amoros,
M. D. Marcos, R. Martinez-Manez and J. Soto, Chem. Commun.,
2002, 562.
Fig. 4 Adsorption capacities of ARMS for (a) single and (b) binary
metal ions in H2O.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Chem. Commun., 2008, 3921–3923 | 3923